-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
keep "Set of" naming consistent #118
Comments
tangential, what do you think about keeping "Box Set" as standard, regardless of number of boxes? example "The Lord of the Rings Tales of Middle earth Scene Boxes Set of 4" -> "The Lord of the Rings Tales of Middle earth Scene Box Set of 4", |
I think that's a bigger question. I've been keeping the plural "s" in Set of X products because it reads better:
And so specifically those products are called "Scene Box" and there is a set of them, so "Scene Boxes". Do we remove the plural across the board? I personally prefer having the plural. |
I'm not native so some of the nuance may be lost, but I think we decided that the product name should contain the category, and that category is "Scene Box" or "Deck Set" regardless of the amount -- it would simplify the parsing for new names for sure |
Yeah I think this is a confusion of human readable vs machine readable. I personally think that the product name should be designed to be easily readable by a human, even if that makes the computer parsing more complex. That's why we have all of the categories and subcategories, to allow the computer to parse and sort on categoric inputs that aren't a text string. |
we need to avoid separating the "set of" with a dash and to always use number instead of spelling things out, and make sure to use "Deck Set" as a tag
are the entries that need a fix
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: