.. currentmodule:: collections_extended
A :class:`setlist` is an ordered, indexed collection with unique elements. It it more than just an ordered Set in that the elements are accessible by index (ie. not just a linked set).
However, :class:`setlist`'s are not comparable like sets or lists. Equality
testing still works, but setlist(('a', 'c')) < setlist(('a', 'b'))
does not
because we'd have to choose to compare by order or by set comparison.
There are two classes provided:
- :class:`collections_extended.setlist`
- This is a mutable setlist
- :class:`collections_extended.frozensetlist`
- This is a frozen (implements :class:`collections.abc.Hashable`) version of a setlist.
Both classes implement :class:`collections.abc.Sequence`, :class:`collections.abc.Set`
>>> from collections_extended import setlist
>>> import string
>>> sl = setlist(string.ascii_lowercase)
>>> sl
setlist(('a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i', 'j', 'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o', 'p', 'q', 'r', 's', 't', 'u', 'v', 'w', 'x', 'y', 'z'))
>>> sl[3]
'd'
>>> sl[-1]
'z'
>>> 'r' in sl # testing for inclusion is fast
True
>>> sl.index('m') # so is finding the index of an element
12
>>> sl.insert(1, 'd') # inserting an element already in raises a ValueError
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
raise ValueError
ValueError
>>> sl.index('d')
3
Most implementations I've see are ordered sets where items are not accessible by index.
- Inclusion testing is O(1)
- Finding an element is O(1)
- Adding an element that is already present raises a ValueError
- Elements are ordered and accessible by index
- Adding an element is as slow as adding to a list
- Amortized O(n) for arbitrary insertions
- O(1) for appending
Swapping values doesn't work (see Quirks) so some things don't work. To work around that a couple of methods were added:
- :meth:`setlist.swap(i, j)` to swap elements
- :meth:`setlist.shuffle(random=None)` instead of random.shuffle(setlist)
Some methods will raise a :exc:`ValueError` when trying to add or remove elements
when they respectively already or do not currently exist in the setlist.
Each method has an analogous version that does/doesn't raise a ValueError.
Methods implementing the Set methods do not raise :exc:`ValueError` while the one's
implementing Sequence do. All will raise TypeError
if you use unhashable values.
The bulk operations are atomic, if any single value is unhashable or a duplicate,
no changes will be made to the :class:`setlist`.
Raises :exc:`ValueError` | No | Yes |
---|---|---|
Interface | :class:`Set` | :class:`Sequence` |
Add a single value | add |
append |
Add multiple values | update |
extend |
Remove a single value | discard |
remove |
Remove multiple values | discard_all |
remove_all |
The setlist constructor by defualt does not raise :exc:`ValueError` on duplicate values
because we have to choose one or the other and this matches the behavior of Set.
There is a flag raise_on_duplicate
that can be passed to __init__
to
raise a :exc:`ValueError` if duplicate values are passed.
- Swapping elements, eg.
sl[0], sl[1] = sl[1], sl[0]
, doesn't work because - it is implemented by first setting one element then the other. But since the first element it tries to set is still in the setlist, nothing happens. This causes random.shuffle not to work on a setlist.
- Swapping elements, eg.
.. autoclass:: collections_extended.SetList
.. autoclass:: collections_extended.setlist
.. autoclass:: collections_extended.frozensetlist