We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In the case where the target coverage is above the actual estimated coverage of the input file, we should not produce a fastq output.
Should an entry still be made in the summary spreadsheet? Maybe something like this, with NA for any target coverage that couldn't be achieved?
NA
sample_id total_reads total_bases q30_rate target_coverage sample-01 42158 10000353 0.881622 2 sample-01 105510 25000351 0.883446 5 sample-01 210932 50000154 0.883396 10 sample-01 421748 100000287 0.882951 20 sample-01 632628 150000289 0.88305 30 sample-01 843538 200000061 0.883072 40 sample-01 NA NA NA 200 sample-01 1172548 278027194 0.882882 original
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
In the case where the target coverage is above the actual estimated coverage of the input file, we should not produce a fastq output.
Should an entry still be made in the summary spreadsheet? Maybe something like this, with
NA
for any target coverage that couldn't be achieved?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: