Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle case where target coverage is above estimated coverage of input #2

Open
dfornika opened this issue Dec 14, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@dfornika
Copy link
Member

In the case where the target coverage is above the actual estimated coverage of the input file, we should not produce a fastq output.

Should an entry still be made in the summary spreadsheet? Maybe something like this, with NA for any target coverage that couldn't be achieved?

sample_id  total_reads  total_bases  q30_rate  target_coverage
sample-01  42158        10000353     0.881622  2
sample-01  105510       25000351     0.883446  5
sample-01  210932       50000154     0.883396  10
sample-01  421748       100000287    0.882951  20
sample-01  632628       150000289    0.88305   30
sample-01  843538       200000061    0.883072  40
sample-01  NA           NA           NA        200
sample-01  1172548      278027194    0.882882  original
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant