Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use Vec::leak instead of Box::<[_]>::leak. #1

Open
eddyb opened this issue Aug 5, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Use Vec::leak instead of Box::<[_]>::leak. #1

eddyb opened this issue Aug 5, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@eddyb
Copy link
Member

eddyb commented Aug 5, 2021

Looks like Vec::leak has been stable for a short while so e.g. vec![...].leak() should work.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@eddyb