Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SoftwareApplication table is confusing - says MUST then SHOULD #89

Open
ptsefton opened this issue Feb 14, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

SoftwareApplication table is confusing - says MUST then SHOULD #89

ptsefton opened this issue Feb 14, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@ptsefton
Copy link

The requirements for @type on SoftwareApplication.

Image

Suggest showing these as three separate tables, one per type (which will be easier when you can generate from linkML) I would also suggest making this table more informative, like:

Image

@simleo
Copy link
Collaborator

simleo commented Feb 25, 2025

The second column says whether the property must/should/may be present in the entity, while the third one describes the requirements of the property's value.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants