You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the is_lower_than_or_equal , is_greater_than_or_equal etc. validations will raise an exception even if there's a single row that violates the provided condition.
Desired functionality
We would like to make this behaviour optionally "slacked", by providing an optional argument that it will indicate the minimum number of DataFrame rows that should violate the provided validation in order to raise an Exception. For example this could like sth like this:
Context
Currently the
is_lower_than_or_equal , is_greater_than_or_equal
etc. validations will raise an exception even if there's a single row that violates the provided condition.Desired functionality
We would like to make this behaviour optionally "slacked", by providing an optional argument that it will indicate the minimum number of DataFrame rows that should violate the provided validation in order to raise an Exception. For example this could like sth like this:
This means that the validation would throw an exception only if a DtaFrame has more than 20 rows where the values are < 100.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: