We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Integrate(1*((x - 2.0)/(3.0))*(1/9.999999999998899E-4), {x, 3.0, 3.001})
Both https://symjaweb.appspot.com/ and Symja 3.0.0 give -0.00124335
WolframAlpha gives ~ 1/3 as expected
Integrate(1*((x - 2.0)/(3.0))*1000.00000000011, {x, 3.0, 3.001}) is virtually the same but this time Symja gives a correct value.
Integrate(1*((x - 2.0)/(3.0))*1000.00000000011, {x, 3.0, 3.001})
Java
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@arturrataj The E symbol is treated as Euler constant, not a scientific notation. Your input can be translated to, which gives correct answer:
E
Euler
Integrate(1*((x - 2.0)/(3.0))*(1/(9.999999999998899*10^-4)), {x, 3.0, 3.001})
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Integrate(1*((x - 2.0)/(3.0))*(1/9.999999999998899E-4), {x, 3.0, 3.001})
Both https://symjaweb.appspot.com/ and Symja 3.0.0 give -0.00124335
WolframAlpha gives ~ 1/3 as expected
Integrate(1*((x - 2.0)/(3.0))*1000.00000000011, {x, 3.0, 3.001})
is virtually the same but this time Symja gives a correct value.Java
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: