Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement importing and exporting of layout files #1971

Open
PathogenDavid opened this issue Aug 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Implement importing and exporting of layout files #1971

PathogenDavid opened this issue Aug 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature New planned feature

Comments

@PathogenDavid
Copy link
Member

Related to #1956

@PathogenDavid PathogenDavid added the feature New planned feature label Aug 12, 2024
@PathogenDavid PathogenDavid added this to the 2.9 milestone Aug 12, 2024
@PathogenDavid PathogenDavid self-assigned this Aug 12, 2024
@glopesdev
Copy link
Member

glopesdev commented Mar 8, 2025

@bruno-f-cruz @PathogenDavid do we still want this given we are now going in the direction where the layout file is simply a local workflow editor setting? We can discuss this during the next DCM but I feel we should investigate whether resolving #2137 might render this issue obsolete.

@bruno-f-cruz
Copy link
Contributor

Given the use case I had in mind I think that #2137 would be my preference. However since it is a decision that may influence future changes in the language this could still be a valuable alternative to consider.

@PathogenDavid
Copy link
Member Author

Tbh I kinda dislike #2137 as the solution to this problem, but I also don't have a horse in this race. If nobody in DCM wants to advocate for this solution I'm OK with waiting to see if people complain that they don't like that approach as a replacement for layout files.

@glopesdev glopesdev removed this from the 2.9 milestone Mar 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New planned feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants