Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Create POC for both validation methods #671

Closed
cwmeijer opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Create POC for both validation methods #671

cwmeijer opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
@cpranav93

Comments

@cwmeijer
Copy link
Member

Handle a single function for both methods listed in #655. Then have a discussion.
@cpranav93 cpranav93 self-assigned this Dec 12, 2023
@cpranav93
Copy link
Contributor

Currently we already use inspect to get kwargs applicable to function. I am a little unclear on what we want to address for the kwargs? We call lime explanation instances from external functions with different possible kwargs and this is accommodated for in DIANNA. If we were to quantify this, then it would have to be an exhaustive effort which may be complicated and has to address for any changes in model apis.

@cpranav93
Copy link
Contributor

Addressed by #693

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@cpranav93 cpranav93

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@cwmeijer @cpranav93