Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add API for Proofs aggregation #1417

Closed
cryptonemo opened this issue Feb 22, 2021 · 8 comments
Closed

Add API for Proofs aggregation #1417

cryptonemo opened this issue Feb 22, 2021 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request P-PoRep

Comments

@cryptonemo
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

With proof aggregation support in the works in bellman, we need an API in proofs to utilize this and expose it to external callers.

Acceptance criteria

Proof aggregation support for seal proofs, with the ability to optionally extend to post proofs if needed.

Risks + pitfalls

Where to begin

https://github.com/filecoin-project/bellperson/tree/feat-ipp2

#1395

filecoin-project/FIPs#72

@cryptonemo cryptonemo added enhancement New feature or request P-PoRep labels Feb 22, 2021
@cryptonemo cryptonemo self-assigned this Feb 22, 2021
@cryptonemo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Related work: filecoin-project/rust-filecoin-proofs-api#51

@cryptonemo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@cryptonemo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@cryptonemo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Related work: filecoin-project/filecoin-ffi#166

@cryptonemo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Related work: https://github.com/cryptonemo/rust-fil-ffi-toolkit

@cryptonemo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Related work: filecoin-project/filecoin-ffi#169

@cryptonemo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Related spec work: nikkolasg/FIPs#2

@cryptonemo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Just realized this was still open, when in fact the issue is closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request P-PoRep
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant