1
1
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
2
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:36 :17
2
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:37 :17
3
3
|
4
4
LL | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
5
5
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&boxed_slice[1]`
6
6
|
7
7
note: the lint level is defined here
8
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:8 :9
8
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:9 :9
9
9
|
10
10
LL | #![deny(clippy::get_unwrap)]
11
11
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
12
12
13
13
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
14
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:36 :17
14
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:37 :17
15
15
|
16
16
LL | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
17
17
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@@ -22,13 +22,13 @@ LL | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
22
22
= help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(clippy::unwrap_used)]`
23
23
24
24
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
25
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:37 :17
25
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38 :17
26
26
|
27
27
LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
28
28
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&some_slice[0]`
29
29
30
30
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
31
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:37 :17
31
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38 :17
32
32
|
33
33
LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
34
34
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@@ -37,13 +37,13 @@ LL | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
37
37
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
38
38
39
39
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
40
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38 :17
40
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39 :17
41
41
|
42
42
LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap();
43
43
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&some_vec[0]`
44
44
45
45
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
46
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38 :17
46
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39 :17
47
47
|
48
48
LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap();
49
49
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@@ -52,13 +52,13 @@ LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap();
52
52
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
53
53
54
54
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
55
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39 :17
55
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:40 :17
56
56
|
57
57
LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap();
58
58
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&some_vecdeque[0]`
59
59
60
60
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
61
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39 :17
61
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:40 :17
62
62
|
63
63
LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap();
64
64
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@@ -67,13 +67,13 @@ LL | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap();
67
67
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
68
68
69
69
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a HashMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
70
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:40 :17
70
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:41 :17
71
71
|
72
72
LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap();
73
73
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&some_hashmap[&1]`
74
74
75
75
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
76
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:40 :17
76
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:41 :17
77
77
|
78
78
LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap();
79
79
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@@ -82,13 +82,13 @@ LL | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap();
82
82
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
83
83
84
84
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a BTreeMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
85
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:41 :17
85
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42 :17
86
86
|
87
87
LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap();
88
88
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&some_btreemap[&1]`
89
89
90
90
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
91
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:41 :17
91
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42 :17
92
92
|
93
93
LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap();
94
94
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@@ -97,13 +97,13 @@ LL | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap();
97
97
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
98
98
99
99
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
100
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:45 :21
100
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:46 :21
101
101
|
102
102
LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
103
103
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `boxed_slice[1]`
104
104
105
105
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
106
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:45 :22
106
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:46 :22
107
107
|
108
108
LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
109
109
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@@ -112,13 +112,13 @@ LL | let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
112
112
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
113
113
114
114
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
115
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:50 :9
115
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:51 :9
116
116
|
117
117
LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
118
118
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `boxed_slice[0]`
119
119
120
120
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
121
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:50 :10
121
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:51 :10
122
122
|
123
123
LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
124
124
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@@ -127,13 +127,13 @@ LL | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
127
127
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
128
128
129
129
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
130
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:51 :9
130
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:52 :9
131
131
|
132
132
LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
133
133
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `some_slice[0]`
134
134
135
135
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
136
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:51 :10
136
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:52 :10
137
137
|
138
138
LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
139
139
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@@ -142,13 +142,13 @@ LL | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
142
142
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
143
143
144
144
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
145
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:52 :9
145
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:53 :9
146
146
|
147
147
LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
148
148
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `some_vec[0]`
149
149
150
150
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
151
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:52 :10
151
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:53 :10
152
152
|
153
153
LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
154
154
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@@ -157,13 +157,13 @@ LL | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
157
157
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
158
158
159
159
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
160
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:53 :9
160
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:54 :9
161
161
|
162
162
LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
163
163
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `some_vecdeque[0]`
164
164
165
165
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
166
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:53 :10
166
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:54 :10
167
167
|
168
168
LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
169
169
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@@ -172,13 +172,13 @@ LL | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
172
172
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
173
173
174
174
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
175
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:65 :17
175
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:66 :17
176
176
|
177
177
LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
178
178
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `some_vec[0..1]`
179
179
180
180
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
181
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:65 :17
181
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:66 :17
182
182
|
183
183
LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
184
184
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@@ -187,13 +187,13 @@ LL | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
187
187
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
188
188
189
189
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
190
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:66 :17
190
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:67 :17
191
191
|
192
192
LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
193
193
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `some_vec[0..1]`
194
194
195
195
error: used `unwrap()` on an `Option` value
196
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:66 :17
196
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:67 :17
197
197
|
198
198
LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
199
199
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
@@ -202,25 +202,25 @@ LL | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
202
202
= help: consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
203
203
204
204
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
205
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:76 :24
205
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:77 :24
206
206
|
207
207
LL | let _x: &i32 = f.get(1 + 2).unwrap();
208
208
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&f[1 + 2]`
209
209
210
210
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
211
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:79 :18
211
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:80 :18
212
212
|
213
213
LL | let _x = f.get(1 + 2).unwrap().to_string();
214
214
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `f[1 + 2]`
215
215
216
216
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
217
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:82 :18
217
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:83 :18
218
218
|
219
219
LL | let _x = f.get(1 + 2).unwrap().abs();
220
220
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `f[1 + 2]`
221
221
222
222
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
223
- --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:99 :33
223
+ --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:100 :33
224
224
|
225
225
LL | let b = rest.get_mut(linidx(j, k) - linidx(i, k) - 1).unwrap();
226
226
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try: `&mut rest[linidx(j, k) - linidx(i, k) - 1]`
0 commit comments