You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Specifying a param value like --input_cycle as a bare filename does not work -- nextflow doesn't seem to "see" the file.
Prefixing the filename with its full absolute path works around this. This is probably something about nf-validation handling of the params.
Command used and terminal output
# samplesheet.csv DOES exist here!
$ nextflow run nf-core/mcmicro --input_cycle samplesheet.csv ......ERROR ~ Error executing process > 'NFCORE_MCMICRO:MCMICRO:INPUT_CHECK:SAMPLE_AND_MARKER_SHEET_CHECK'Caused by: Not a valid path value: 'samplesheet.csv'...
Relevant files
No response
System information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Now that I think about it some more, it may actually be best to enforce that these paths are absolute to help with reproducibility and self-documentation of the resulting params.json.
I believe this stems from core nextflow path parsing, which nf-validation delegates to. nextflow.Nextflow.file() will raise an exception if the path is a local file path that doesn't start with a /. This is probably a good thing in the end, but nf-validation's use of that particular code path doesn't seem quite right since it does a lot of other things. (like glob expansion!)
Description of the bug
Specifying a param value like --input_cycle as a bare filename does not work -- nextflow doesn't seem to "see" the file.
Prefixing the filename with its full absolute path works around this. This is probably something about nf-validation handling of the params.
Command used and terminal output
Relevant files
No response
System information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: