You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This might be me misinterpreting how the "nearest" parameter optimizes the seam position, but I thought that this function places the seam position at the nearest corner with respect to the last movement on the previous layer. Here's what I'm seeing on my print:
As you can see, the seam position isn't always being placed at an obvious nearby corner on the model. This is resulting in those small zits appearing. For the unwanted seam position that's not in a corner, here's the last movement for the previous layer:
The unwanted seam position seems unnecessary as there is an obvious corner (among others) nearby, so I'm not sure why this is happening.
Description of the bug
This might be me misinterpreting how the "nearest" parameter optimizes the seam position, but I thought that this function places the seam position at the nearest corner with respect to the last movement on the previous layer. Here's what I'm seeing on my print:
As you can see, the seam position isn't always being placed at an obvious nearby corner on the model. This is resulting in those small zits appearing. For the unwanted seam position that's not in a corner, here's the last movement for the previous layer:
The unwanted seam position seems unnecessary as there is an obvious corner (among others) nearby, so I'm not sure why this is happening.
Project file & How to reproduce
test model.zip
Checklist of files included above
Version of PrusaSlicer
Prusaslicer 2.8
Operating system
Windows 11
Printer model
MK3S+
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: