Rollup merge of #94438 - compiler-errors:check-method-inputs-once, r=davidtwco

Check method input expressions once

If the user mistakenly forgets to wrap their method args in a tuple, then the compiler tries to check that  types within the tuple match the expression args. This means we call `check_expr` once within this diagnostic code, so when we check the expr once again in `demand_compatible`, we attempt to apply expr adjustments twice, leading to ICEs.

This PR attempts to fix this by skipping the expression type check in `demand_compatible` if we have detected an method arg mismatch at all.

This does lead to a single UI test regressing slightly, due to a diagnostic disappearing, though I don't know if it is generally meaningful to even raise an type error after noting that the argument count is incorrect in a function call, since the user might be providing (in-context) meaningless expressions to the wrong method.

I can adjust this to be a bit more targeted (to just skip checking exprs in `demand_compatible` in the tuple case) if this UI test regression is a problem.

fixes #94334
cc #94291

Also drive-by fixup of `.node_type(expr.hir_id)` to `.expr_ty(expr)`, since that method exists.

Author: matthiaskrgr

compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/demand.rs

@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
             return None;
         };
 
-        let self_ty = self.typeck_results.borrow().node_type(method_expr[0].hir_id);
+        let self_ty = self.typeck_results.borrow().expr_ty(&method_expr[0]);
         let self_ty = format!("{:?}", self_ty);
         let name = method_path.ident.name;
         let is_as_ref_able = (self_ty.starts_with("&std::option::Option")

compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/expr.rs

@@ -1517,7 +1517,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
                 }
             } else {
                 self.check_expr_has_type_or_error(base_expr, adt_ty, |_| {
-                    let base_ty = self.typeck_results.borrow().node_type(base_expr.hir_id);
+                    let base_ty = self.typeck_results.borrow().expr_ty(*base_expr);
                     let same_adt = match (adt_ty.kind(), base_ty.kind()) {
                         (ty::Adt(adt, _), ty::Adt(base_adt, _)) if adt == base_adt => true,
                         _ => false,

compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/fn_ctxt/_impl.rs

@@ -313,15 +313,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
                     ) => {
                         // A reborrow has no effect before a dereference.
                     }
-                    // Catch cases which have Deref(None)
-                    // having them slip to bug! causes ICE
-                    // see #94291 for more info
-                    (&[Adjustment { kind: Adjust::Deref(None), .. }], _) => {
-                        self.tcx.sess.delay_span_bug(
-                            DUMMY_SP,
-                            &format!("Can't compose Deref(None) expressions"),
-                        )
-                    }
                     // FIXME: currently we never try to compose autoderefs
                     // and ReifyFnPointer/UnsafeFnPointer, but we could.
                     _ => bug!(

compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/fn_ctxt/checks.rs

@@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
         let expected_arg_count = formal_input_tys.len();
 
         // expected_count, arg_count, error_code, sugg_unit, sugg_tuple_wrap_args
-        let mut error: Option<(usize, usize, &str, bool, Option<FnArgsAsTuple<'_>>)> = None;
+        let mut arg_count_error: Option<(usize, usize, &str, bool, Option<FnArgsAsTuple<'_>>)> =
+            None;
 
         // If the arguments should be wrapped in a tuple (ex: closures), unwrap them here
         let (formal_input_tys, expected_input_tys) = if tuple_arguments == TupleArguments {
@@ -143,7 +144,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
                 ty::Tuple(arg_types) => {
                     // Argument length differs
                     if arg_types.len() != provided_args.len() {
-                        error = Some((arg_types.len(), provided_args.len(), "E0057", false, None));
+                        arg_count_error =
+                            Some((arg_types.len(), provided_args.len(), "E0057", false, None));
                     }
                     let expected_input_tys = match expected_input_tys.get(0) {
                         Some(&ty) => match ty.kind() {
@@ -174,7 +176,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
             if supplied_arg_count >= expected_arg_count {
                 (formal_input_tys.to_vec(), expected_input_tys)
             } else {
-                error = Some((expected_arg_count, supplied_arg_count, "E0060", false, None));
+                arg_count_error =
+                    Some((expected_arg_count, supplied_arg_count, "E0060", false, None));
                 (self.err_args(supplied_arg_count), vec![])
             }
         } else {
@@ -198,7 +201,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
 
             let sugg_tuple_wrap_args = self.suggested_tuple_wrap(expected_input_tys, provided_args);
 
-            error = Some((
+            arg_count_error = Some((
                 expected_arg_count,
                 supplied_arg_count,
                 "E0061",
@@ -231,6 +234,11 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
         // This is more complicated than just checking type equality, as arguments could be coerced
         // This version writes those types back so further type checking uses the narrowed types
         let demand_compatible = |idx, final_arg_types: &mut Vec<Option<(Ty<'tcx>, Ty<'tcx>)>>| {
+            // Do not check argument compatibility if the number of args do not match
+            if arg_count_error.is_some() {
+                return;
+            }
+
             let formal_input_ty: Ty<'tcx> = formal_input_tys[idx];
             let expected_input_ty: Ty<'tcx> = expected_input_tys[idx];
             let provided_arg = &provided_args[idx];
@@ -328,7 +336,8 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
         }
 
         // If there was an error in parameter count, emit that here
-        if let Some((expected_count, arg_count, err_code, sugg_unit, sugg_tuple_wrap_args)) = error
+        if let Some((expected_count, arg_count, err_code, sugg_unit, sugg_tuple_wrap_args)) =
+            arg_count_error
         {
             let (span, start_span, args, ctor_of) = match &call_expr.kind {
                 hir::ExprKind::Call(

src/test/ui/mismatched_types/overloaded-calls-bad.rs

@@ -30,5 +30,4 @@ fn main() {
     //~^ ERROR this function takes 1 argument but 0 arguments were supplied
     let ans = s("burma", "shave");
     //~^ ERROR this function takes 1 argument but 2 arguments were supplied
-    //~| ERROR mismatched types
 }

src/test/ui/mismatched_types/overloaded-calls-bad.stderr

@@ -18,12 +18,6 @@ note: associated function defined here
 LL |     extern "rust-call" fn call_mut(&mut self, args: Args) -> Self::Output;
    |                           ^^^^^^^^
 
-error[E0308]: mismatched types
-  --> $DIR/overloaded-calls-bad.rs:31:17
-   |
-LL |     let ans = s("burma", "shave");
-   |                 ^^^^^^^ expected `isize`, found `&str`
-
 error[E0057]: this function takes 1 argument but 2 arguments were supplied
   --> $DIR/overloaded-calls-bad.rs:31:15
    |
@@ -38,7 +32,7 @@ note: associated function defined here
 LL |     extern "rust-call" fn call_mut(&mut self, args: Args) -> Self::Output;
    |                           ^^^^^^^^
 
-error: aborting due to 4 previous errors
+error: aborting due to 3 previous errors
 
 Some errors have detailed explanations: E0057, E0308.
 For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0057`.

src/test/ui/tuple/wrong_argument_ice-2.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+fn test(t: (i32, i32)) {}
+
+struct Foo;
+
+impl Foo {
+    fn qux(&self) -> i32 {
+        0
+    }
+}
+
+fn bar() {
+    let x = Foo;
+    test(x.qux(), x.qux());
+    //~^ ERROR this function takes 1 argument but 2 arguments were supplied
+}
+
+fn main() {}

src/test/ui/tuple/wrong_argument_ice-2.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+error[E0061]: this function takes 1 argument but 2 arguments were supplied
+  --> $DIR/wrong_argument_ice-2.rs:13:5
+   |
+LL |     test(x.qux(), x.qux());
+   |     ^^^^ -------  ------- supplied 2 arguments
+   |
+note: function defined here
+  --> $DIR/wrong_argument_ice-2.rs:1:4
+   |
+LL | fn test(t: (i32, i32)) {}
+   |    ^^^^ -------------
+help: use parentheses to construct a tuple
+   |
+LL |     test((x.qux(), x.qux()));
+   |          +                +
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
+
+For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0061`.