Mismatch between documentation and diagram for FixedValueMap?

[sosna]

The documentation for FixedValueMap (p. 114) provides the following description: "Links a Component (source or target) to a fixed value.".

However, the Relationship diagram on page 111 has the following cardinality between FixedValueMap and Component: 0..*. Should it not be 1 instead?

The XML schemas are in line with the description (i.e. only one component is referenced):

<xs:complexType name="FixedValueMapType">
	<xs:annotation>
		<xs:documentation>FixedValueMapType defines the structure for providing a fixed value for a source or target component.</xs:documentation>
	</xs:annotation>
	<xs:complexContent>
		<xs:extension base="common:AnnotableType">
			<xs:sequence>
				<xs:choice>
					<xs:element name="Source" type="common:IDType"/>
					<xs:element name="Target" type="common:IDType"/>
				</xs:choice>
				<xs:element name="Value" type="xs:string" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
					<xs:annotation>
						<xs:documentation>The fixed value for the component.</xs:documentation>
					</xs:annotation>
				</xs:element>
			</xs:sequence>
		</xs:extension>
	</xs:complexContent>
</xs:complexType>

Thanks!

[stratosn]

Indeed, the relationship seems wrong, as one Component should be mapped in each FixedValueMap.
This is a bug in the IM.

In addition, it looks like the schema needs also some attention, as it now allows 0 to unbounded values, where there should be only one fixed value.
@dosse does this makes sense?

I also see that in the json-schema it is allowed to have 1..* values.