Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 3, 2018. It is now read-only.

Splitting novice/sql to a new repository #829

Closed
tomwright01 opened this issue Nov 5, 2014 · 8 comments
Closed

Splitting novice/sql to a new repository #829

tomwright01 opened this issue Nov 5, 2014 · 8 comments

Comments

@tomwright01
Copy link

@acabunoc @mckays630
Following the decision to split lessons into separate repositories, with help from @wking i have made a start on the novice/sql repository.
https://github.com/tomwright01/swc-modular-sql

@abbycabs
Copy link

abbycabs commented Nov 5, 2014

Thanks @tomwright01! Much appreciated.

@wking
Copy link
Contributor

wking commented Nov 5, 2014

On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 05:45:49PM -0800, Tom Wright wrote:

Following the decision to split lessons into separate repositories,
with help from @wking i have made a start on the novice/sql
repository.

To keep things simple and avoid accidentally loosing work during the
transition, we should probably freeze novice/sql development while
we're reworking the history. From a quick search, that means not
merging #657, #771, #790, or #792. Once we've got the lesson split
out and its history tidied up, we can port those PRs over to the new
lesson repository.

@wking
Copy link
Contributor

wking commented Nov 5, 2014

On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 08:09:40AM -0800, W. Trevor King wrote:

… we should probably freeze novice/sql development while we're
reworking the history. From a quick search, that means not merging
#657, #771, #790, or #792.

Also the novice/sql parts of #830, which should probably be refactored
into two PRs (one for the novice/shell bits, and one for the other
parts.

@tomwright01
Copy link
Author

@acabunoc @mckays630

I think the basic split for novice/sql is complete.
Summary of the process is here:
tomwright01/swc-modular-sql#3

Can the maintainers please audit this?
https://github.com/tomwright01/swc-modular-sql

Thanks

@wking
Copy link
Contributor

wking commented Nov 12, 2014

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 07:52:48PM -0800, Tom Wright wrote:

I think the basic split for novice/sql is complete.

Another thing to consider (while we're free to rewrite things) is if
you want to polish up any of the extracted history. For example, in
the novice/shell lesson, we've rewritten a few commit messages 1 so
they conform to the:

style.

@abbycabs
Copy link

Thanks @tomwright01 - I'll take a look later this week. @mckays630: feel free to take a stab if you time!

@gvwilson
Copy link
Contributor

Given infinite monkeys I'd say 'yes', but I think we've already asked
enough of our volunteers, and realistically, what we're really trying to
capture is who did the work...

@wking
Copy link
Contributor

wking commented Jan 5, 2015

Can this be closed now that we have
https://github.com/swcarpentry/sql-novice-survey?

@gvwilson gvwilson closed this as completed Jan 6, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants