Notes missing numbers when drawn into understanding docs

[alastc]

From Mike Tschudi on email:

On the page https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/three-flashes-or-below-threshold.html in the “general flash and red flash thresholds” section, there is the sentence “Content automatically passes (see #1 and #2 above).”, but I don’t see what these numbers refer to. Might these number labels be added in the document, or the numbers become links to the sections that they refer to?

You need to open the "Key terms", and that text is at the end of the last note.

In the Spec version of that definition, the notes are numbered, which makes sense.

In the understanding doc version, they are not.

Given the phaff of updating the spec version, could the notes be updated with numbers in the understanding doc version?

[kfranqueiro]

Notes with regard to scope:

• This issue occurs not only within term definitions, but also within SC content (e.g. 3.3.8)
• This issue also occurs for examples (only within term definitions)
• Notes/examples are only numbered when there is more than one in the applicable section

Currently, markup for notes and examples is handled in a single pass for each. Numbering them correctly will require at minimum checking how many are under a particular parent (section for SC, dd for term definition).