Only files with the 'extension' .user.js get picked up by userscript managers #3
+0
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Is there a specific reason why you were using just .js? When I look at the raw page in my own repository with the file name change included in this request, GreaseMonkey immediately suggests that I install the script whereas in your repository I just get to see the file content.
Do note that accepting this pull request will require adjusting the URLs on the forum. But the impact of that should be limited. You could add a .js file at the old location that just contains the link to the .user.js file, for example.
Also: I should really learn to pull changes before adjusting stuff...