Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use separate storage volume options #201

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 27, 2025
Merged

use separate storage volume options #201

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 27, 2025

Conversation

fghanmi
Copy link
Collaborator

@fghanmi fghanmi commented Mar 26, 2025

No description provided.

@fghanmi fghanmi requested review from ritz303 and a team as code owners March 26, 2025 15:17
Copy link

Hi 👋 here are your HTML README previews:

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
label: "{{ item }}"

- name: Create volume if it does not exist
ansible.builtin.command: podman volume create {{ tas_single_node_podman_volume_create_extra_args }} {{ item }}
ansible.builtin.command: podman volume create {{ lookup('vars', 'tas_single_node_' + item | replace('-', '_') + '_create_args', default='') }} {{ item }}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about making the configuration value a dict like this:

tas_single_node_podman_volume_create_extra_args:
  tuf_repository: ""
  tuf_signing_keys: ""
  # and so on

This would group the values together nicely and would also allow you to do something like tas_single_node_podman_volume_create_extra_args[item] here which I think is nicer.

Copy link

Hi 👋 here are your HTML README previews:

@fghanmi fghanmi requested a review from bkabrda March 27, 2025 09:20
Copy link
Collaborator

@bkabrda bkabrda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@fghanmi fghanmi merged commit 064a635 into main Mar 27, 2025
7 checks passed
@fghanmi fghanmi deleted the update/SECURESIGN-1488 branch March 27, 2025 10:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants