Implement NixOS configuration for webforge with CI/CD Nix workflow #28
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Benoit Donneaux <benoit@leastauthority.com>
Signed-off-by: Benoit Donneaux <benoit@leastauthority.com>
btlogy
force-pushed
the
gha-webforge-nix
branch
from
650195a to
da3ad66
Compare
Signed-off-by: Benoit Donneaux <benoit@leastauthority.com>
|
@hacklschorsch is not going to like it (1063 lines of code full of place for bugs to hide :-/), but we need to start this workflow somewhere. I've considered to split this PR in different pieces, but each steps would end up achieving not much until the last one (which would be actually deploying the services we need). |
Closed
Signed-off-by: Benoit Donneaux <benoit@leastauthority.com>
Co-authored-by: Florian Sesser <florian@leastauthority.com> Signed-off-by: Benoit Donneaux <benoit@leastauthority.com>
Co-authored-by: Florian Sesser <florian@leastauthority.com> Signed-off-by: Benoit Donneaux <benoit@leastauthority.com>
Co-authored-by: Florian Sesser <florian@leastauthority.com> Signed-off-by: Benoit Donneaux <benoit@leastauthority.com>
Co-authored-by: Florian Sesser <florian@leastauthority.com> Signed-off-by: Benoit Donneaux <benoit@leastauthority.com>
Signed-off-by: Benoit Donneaux <benoit@leastauthority.com>
|
I've started to back ported a few improvements from @hacklschorsch in this PR (#23, #24, #25 and #26). But I had to revert #25 because this does not work with flake. Which lead me to consider if we could switch to the small variants of the nixpkgs... |
Signed-off-by: Benoit Donneaux <benoit@leastauthority.com>
|
Too big to be review: let's split it in smaller pieces. |
|
Closed in favor of either one of those: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Part of #4161 Move off Trac - Execution - Forgejo
This PR is implementing a workflow which we're already using at Least Authority to simplify the management of a few NixOS systems and automatically deploy changed in a pull fashion way (see the README file).
It has been largely inspired from the following projects:
Merging this PR should trigger the automatic deployment of the NixOS configuration of
webforgeas defined in thenix/hosts/webforgefolder.This should should provide us an empty Forgejo, some blank website and a reverse proxy to expose the legacy (current) Trac and web landing page of the Tahoe-LAFS project.
WARNING
This configuration requires a few DNS records to be published before merging:
In addition to a few more records required to make it fully functional later:
But we might be able to automate the management of those 15 records via pull requests (see #4162 Infrastructure as Code to manage DNS configurations).