Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add XkbStateRec struct definition #104

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 9, 2019
Merged

Conversation

chrisduerr
Copy link
Contributor

This adds type and field name information to the _XkbStateRec struct for
the XkbGetState request.

The fields have been taken from my local
/usr/include/X11/extensions/XKBstr.h file, since online documentation
turned out to be incorrect/outdated, leading to struct layout issues.

This adds type and field name information to the _XkbStateRec struct for
the XkbGetState request.

The fields have been taken from my local
/usr/include/X11/extensions/XKBstr.h file, since online documentation
turned out to be incorrect/outdated, leading to struct layout issues.
@erlepereira
Copy link
Collaborator

cheers! The fail on 1.24.1 can be locked to the version needed via travis. Will review this and merge over the next few days.

@chrisduerr
Copy link
Contributor Author

cheers! The fail on 1.24.1 can be locked to the version needed via travis. Will review this and merge over the next few days.

Oh yeah, I didn't even notice the failure on travis, sorry. But looks like it already exists in master.

@erlepereira erlepereira merged commit 4bc2be3 into AltF02:master Sep 9, 2019
@erlepereira
Copy link
Collaborator

Merging this, the fix for the compile error in v1.24.1 requires pinning the version of lazy_static for that version of rust. Fixed on master in travis.

erlepereira added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2020
malwrar pushed a commit to malwrar/x11-rs that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants