Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Repack in place complete console message now includes storage module name #635

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

vird
Copy link
Collaborator

@vird vird commented Oct 24, 2024

Proposal
Untested (because it's way difficult to test that comparing to implementation)

"the storage module folder to reflect the new packing, and start the "
"node with the new storage module.~n", []),
"node with the new storage module.~n", [Label]),
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thin we want to output the StoreID rather than the label. The Label is the obfuscated storage module name (with the mining address hidden), but since the console message is only visible to the miner, it's probably more helpful to include the real storage module name (non obfuscated). Like what is included in the LOG_INFO: https://github.com/ArweaveTeam/arweave/pull/635/files#diff-70860f94e3504d0cdd89e58a65a090fadb6a75eabc58f0a89aeae829109e8dbbR768

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now it should be "Repacking of strorage_module_50_ADDR.1 is complete!"

Copy link
Collaborator

@JamesPiechota JamesPiechota left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@vird vird merged commit e32aaa2 into master Oct 24, 2024
67 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants