Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update smp and lading to their latest releases #18725

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 10, 2023
Merged

Conversation

blt
Copy link
Contributor

@blt blt commented Aug 10, 2023

What does this PR do?

This commit updates the smp binary to its latest release, removing a legacy flow with no user-facing change. The latest version of lading has a slightly improved throttle mechanism.

REF SMP-673

This commit updates the `smp` binary to its latest release, removing a legacy
flow with no user-facing change. The latest version of lading has a slightly
improved throttle mechanism.

REF SMP-673

Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian.troutwine@datadoghq.com>
@blt blt requested a review from a team as a code owner August 10, 2023 00:17
blt added a commit to vectordotdev/vector that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2023
This commit updates the smp binary to its latest release, removing a legacy flow
with no user-facing change. Peer to
DataDog/datadog-agent#18725. I have not opted to update
lading in this PR as the jump from 0.12 to 0.18 is rather large.

REF SMP-673

Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian.troutwine@datadoghq.com>
blt added a commit to vectordotdev/vector that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2023
This commit updates the smp binary to its latest release, removing a legacy flow
with no user-facing change. Peer to
DataDog/datadog-agent#18725. I have not opted to update
lading in this PR as the jump from 0.12 to 0.18 is rather large.

REF SMP-673

Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian.troutwine@datadoghq.com>
@blt blt added this to the 7.48.0 milestone Aug 10, 2023
@blt blt added changelog/no-changelog [deprecated] qa/skip-qa - use other qa/ labels [DEPRECATED] Please use qa/done or qa/no-code-change to skip creating a QA card labels Aug 10, 2023
@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Aug 10, 2023

Bloop Bleep... Dogbot Here

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 253f1441-f52c-4d5c-a333-ac4f061be8c4
Baseline: b8377df
Comparison: bbca8c4
Total datadog-agent CPUs: 7

Explanation

A regression test is an integrated performance test for datadog-agent in a repeatable rig, with varying configuration for datadog-agent. What follows is a statistical summary of a brief datadog-agent run for each configuration across SHAs given above. The goal of these tests are to determine quickly if datadog-agent performance is changed and to what degree by a pull request.

Because a target's optimization goal performance in each experiment will vary somewhat each time it is run, we can only estimate mean differences in optimization goal relative to the baseline target. We express these differences as a percentage change relative to the baseline target, denoted "Δ mean %". These estimates are made to a precision that balances accuracy and cost control. We represent this precision as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI": there is a 90.00% chance that the true value of "Δ mean %" is in that interval.

We decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if both of the following two criteria are true:

  1. The estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%. This criterion intends to answer the question "Does the estimated change in mean optimization goal performance have a meaningful impact on your customers?". We assume that when |Δ mean %| < 5.00%, the impact on your customers is not meaningful. We also assume that a performance change in optimization goal is worth investigating whether it is an increase or decrease, so long as the magnitude of the change is sufficiently large.

  2. Zero is not in the 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" about "Δ mean %". This statement is equivalent to saying that there is at least a 90.00% chance that the mean difference in optimization goal is not zero. This criterion intends to answer the question, "Is there a statistically significant difference in mean optimization goal performance?". It also means there is no more than a 10.00% chance this criterion reports a statistically significant difference when the true difference in mean optimization goal is zero -- a "false positive". We assume you are willing to accept a 10.00% chance of inaccurately detecting a change in performance when no true difference exists.

The table below, if present, lists those experiments that have experienced a statistically significant change in mean optimization goal performance between baseline and comparison SHAs with 90.00% confidence OR have been detected as newly erratic. Negative values of "Δ mean %" mean that baseline is faster, whereas positive values of "Δ mean %" mean that comparison is faster. Results that do not exhibit more than a ±5.00% change in their mean optimization goal are discarded. An experiment is erratic if its coefficient of variation is greater than 0.1. The abbreviated table will be omitted if no interesting change is observed.

No interesting changes in experiment optimization goals with confidence ≥ 90.00% and |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%.

Fine details of change detection per experiment.
experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI confidence
trace_agent_msgpack ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.05, +0.08] 18.47%
file_to_blackhole egress throughput +0.00 [-0.88, +0.88] 0.00%
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.02, +0.02] 1.50%
trace_agent_json ingress throughput -0.04 [-0.12, +0.04] 51.80%
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -0.13 [-1.14, +0.88] 13.34%
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.19 [-0.28, -0.10] 99.30%
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.37 [-1.19, +0.45] 43.48%

@blt blt merged commit f378870 into main Aug 10, 2023
@blt blt deleted the smp/update_smp_binary_lading branch August 10, 2023 01:53
blt added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2023
Now that we have `smp` updated in #18725 we can flip on profiling for every
regression detector run.

Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian.troutwine@datadoghq.com>
blt added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2023
Now that we have `smp` updated in #18725 we can flip on profiling for every
regression detector run.

Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian.troutwine@datadoghq.com>
blt added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2023
Now that we have `smp` updated in #18725 we can flip on profiling for every
regression detector run.

Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian.troutwine@datadoghq.com>
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit to vectordotdev/vector that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2023
Update `smp` to its latest released version

This commit updates the smp binary to its latest release, removing a legacy flow
with no user-facing change. Peer to
DataDog/datadog-agent#18725. I have not opted to update
lading in this PR as the jump from 0.12 to 0.18 is rather large.

REF SMP-673

Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian.troutwine@datadoghq.com>
blt added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 11, 2023
…ents (#18741)

* Flip on profiling for regression experiments

Now that we have `smp` updated in #18725 we can flip on profiling for every
regression detector run.

Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian.troutwine@datadoghq.com>

* do not adjust optimization goals

Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian.troutwine@datadoghq.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian.troutwine@datadoghq.com>
neuronull pushed a commit to vectordotdev/vector that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2023
Update `smp` to its latest released version

This commit updates the smp binary to its latest release, removing a legacy flow
with no user-facing change. Peer to
DataDog/datadog-agent#18725. I have not opted to update
lading in this PR as the jump from 0.12 to 0.18 is rather large.

REF SMP-673

Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine <brian.troutwine@datadoghq.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog [deprecated] qa/skip-qa - use other qa/ labels [DEPRECATED] Please use qa/done or qa/no-code-change to skip creating a QA card
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants