-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 805
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix infinite loop due to integer overflow when reading large strings #1350
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
32 changes: 32 additions & 0 deletions
32
src/test/java/com/fasterxml/jackson/core/json/TestLargeString.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ | ||
package com.fasterxml.jackson.core.json; | ||
|
||
import com.fasterxml.jackson.core.*; | ||
import net.bytebuddy.utility.RandomString; | ||
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test; | ||
|
||
import java.io.ByteArrayOutputStream; | ||
|
||
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals; | ||
|
||
class TestLargeString extends JUnit5TestBase { | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
void testLargeStringDeserialization() throws Exception | ||
{ | ||
String largeString = RandomString.make(Integer.MAX_VALUE - 1024); | ||
JsonFactory f = JsonFactory.builder() | ||
.streamReadConstraints(StreamReadConstraints.builder() | ||
.maxStringLength(Integer.MAX_VALUE) | ||
.build()) | ||
.build(); | ||
ByteArrayOutputStream bytes = new ByteArrayOutputStream(); | ||
JsonGenerator g = f.createGenerator(bytes); | ||
g.writeString(largeString); | ||
g.close(); | ||
|
||
JsonParser parser = f.createParser(bytes.toByteArray()); | ||
String parsedString = parser.nextTextValue(); | ||
|
||
assertEquals(largeString, parsedString); | ||
} | ||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there any way that this could be set to something like the StreamReadConstraints max number size? For people who might set a bigger max number size but that don't go for the absolute max.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
eg would
_inputEnd
work?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, either
_inputEnd
or_streamReadConstraints.getMaxStringLength()
will fix the issue. Do you have a preference?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
min of both?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
actually, looking at the code Integer.MAX_VALUE looks like a good fallback
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, I think Integer.MAX_VALUE would be fine since we're just trying to prevent an overflow here.
max
would generally be larger than the max string length or_inputEnd
. Verification that we don't go beyond the max string length happens when data is read.