-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stop exposing ros-master port and better health check #148
Stop exposing ros-master port and better health check #148
Conversation
…ore outside Better healthcheck for roscore container
Thanks for opening this Pull Request!
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you please indicate the use cases list you want to achieve with this PR ?
- better health check is one thing internal to the container : no problem to enhance it
- not exposing the port of ros-master is something more functional and feature oriented, I am afraid this change is not enough to reach the aimed feature
This PR is just to close up a wound that is restricting the users without additional advantage. We have another good way to expose the ROS topics using the movai-cheatsheet, which has been tested thoroughly in the EE. It is better than exposing the full network to the host (which can have unintended consequences). So to summarize what this PR archives.
|
OK, I got it. I will just complete that for the long term, I would recommend not to have any CLI at all ;) |
Haha. I have to disagree from a ros developer perspective. It's much easier for me to develop with a cli even if there is a good UI tool. It saves time ;) |
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
@xsoulp FYI. This should solve a bit of the issue you were mentioning.
@diasdm This should be enough for the sonarqube test?