-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FastX adapter/verifier] Followup to the module initializers PR (#337) #436
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
41366b3
Added assertions representing current set of restrictions for accessi…
awelc 1f15275
Gas-related fixes to the module initializers implementation
awelc d651ddd
Do not apply gas budget to the actual publishing operation for now
awelc 574317f
Changes to assertions
awelc 17ea24d
Gas-related cleanup and fixes
awelc e74c8f5
Cleaned up gas handling during MoveVM operations
awelc f1a0106
Replaced a macro with a function
awelc File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems really complicated. Not sure if I fully understand why we need all these three, but
execute_internal
shouldn't need to worry about the total budget or previously used gas. All it needs to know is the current remaining budget, and if fail, return the amount used (which will always be <= current budget). And the caller handle the final numbersThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that the logic is sound, and the additional parameters are used to create the correct error values in
execute_internal
. I agree that this is not easy to follow, though, and I will try to refactor it further to post-process failure results coming fromexecute_internal
to reflect total gas values in its caller, rather than handling these directly inexecute_internal
and mostly propagating the errors up the call chain. This should hopefully simplifyexecute_internal
and make the whole gas handling more intuitive.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
An attempt to clean this up is in. Hopefully it's easier to read (and makes some sense) - it's surprisingly subtle (particularly to uninitiated not used to thinking in these terms).