Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 28, 2023. It is now read-only.

Add support for new experiments API changes #854

Closed
6 tasks done
jyu00 opened this issue Jan 5, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed
6 tasks done

Add support for new experiments API changes #854

jyu00 opened this issue Jan 5, 2021 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
type: enhancement Existing functionality improvement

Comments

@jyu00
Copy link
Collaborator

jyu00 commented Jan 5, 2021

What is the expected enhancement?

Support the new experiments API changes:

  • [ ] make device_components optional for analysis results
  • [ ] make fit optional for analysis results
  • support updating experiment extra and tags
  • support device backend name
  • support excluder_owner and owner_only when filtering experiments
  • typo in public_only docstring
  • new verified boolean
  • new free-form notes in experiments
@jyu00 jyu00 added the type: enhancement Existing functionality improvement label Jan 5, 2021
@mriedem
Copy link
Contributor

mriedem commented Jan 8, 2021

It's now also possible to filter experiments in GET /experiments by owner using the special me and !me values:

  • GET /experiments?owner=me: only return experiments owned by the user making the request
  • GET /experiments?owner=!me: only return experiments available to but not owned by the user making the request

@jyu00
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jyu00 commented Jan 8, 2021

@mriedem FYI since these new changes are to support Ignis, I'm going to wait until the Ignis interface (Qiskit/qiskit#5499) is finalized before working on this, since there will be a bit of interface change.

@mriedem
Copy link
Contributor

mriedem commented Jan 8, 2021

OK, no problem. Would you want to split out the owner=me and owner=!me support stuff into a separate issue to be worked on outside of the Ignis changes, or is just everything held up on that interface change?

@jyu00
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jyu00 commented Jan 12, 2021

Sure. owner=me can be done separately.

@jyu00
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jyu00 commented Jul 29, 2021

Closed by #945

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
type: enhancement Existing functionality improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants