You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current implementation of question_and_answer.py only processes one PDF at a time. This feature request proposes adding support for processing multiple PDFs simultaneously, which would streamline workflows for users handling multiple documents.
Many use cases require analyzing multiple documents at once. Handling each PDF individually is inefficient, especially when comparing or aggregating data across several PDFs.
I would like the tool to accept multiple PDF as input— as a list of dictionaries —and process them either sequentially or concurrently. The output should either be consolidated into a single result or clearly separated by document, making it easier for users to work with multiple documents.
We might require one more tool which can decide which pdf's content to use based on user's query.
Multi-PDF support would greatly benefit users such as researchers and analysts who regularly work with multiple documents. This enhancement would save time and simplify the process of comparing or extracting information from several PDFs simultaneously.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To enhance this iteration, let's integrate NVIDIA's RAPIDS library. Specifically, we should explore incorporating FAISS with cuVS for GPU-accelerated vector search.
@NimeshKotian A team from our recent hackathon developed several scripts using FAISS #137. Perhaps these could be a useful starting point for simple index building and saving using FAISS.
The current implementation of question_and_answer.py only processes one PDF at a time. This feature request proposes adding support for processing multiple PDFs simultaneously, which would streamline workflows for users handling multiple documents.
Many use cases require analyzing multiple documents at once. Handling each PDF individually is inefficient, especially when comparing or aggregating data across several PDFs.
I would like the tool to accept multiple PDF as input— as a list of dictionaries —and process them either sequentially or concurrently. The output should either be consolidated into a single result or clearly separated by document, making it easier for users to work with multiple documents.
We might require one more tool which can decide which pdf's content to use based on user's query.
Multi-PDF support would greatly benefit users such as researchers and analysts who regularly work with multiple documents. This enhancement would save time and simplify the process of comparing or extracting information from several PDFs simultaneously.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: