Add living wage to wage calculator #2042
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
erkde
force-pushed
the
add-living-wage-to-wage-calculator
branch
2 times, most recently
from
2c1321c to
00f4f4e
Compare
|
I've added a comment to the PT story to ask whether these changes are ready to be deployed. |
|
Liz has commented in PT to say that the date for these changes has been moved to 25 November. I'm going to add the Waiting on Factcheck label so that we know we can ignore this for a while. |
…more communicative about its purpose.
…wage eligibility and related regression test artefacts. Add validation to how old are you when checking living wage eligibility to ensure users are at least 25 before continuing.
chrisroos
force-pushed
the
add-living-wage-to-wage-calculator
branch
from
e89dab9 to
3240373
Compare
|
I've rebased this branch on master and force pushed to avoid it from getting too far out of date. |
|
I'm in the process of rebasing this on master now that questions live in ERB templates. |
|
This has been superseded by PR #2161 so I'm closing this PR. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Superseded by PR #2161
PT Story - https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/106292374
Rationale
This change updates the "Am I getting minimum wage?" calculator with an option for people to check if they will receive the living wage when it goes live 1 April 2016.
All the logic remains the same and follows the path as if you were calculating a current rate, with only a minor change in the age question, asking how old will you be on 1 April 2016, instead of how old are you.
Those over 25 on 1 April 2016, who receive 7.20 or more per hour, will see that they will be receiving the living wage, and those receiving less than 7.20 per hour will see a message that they should be receiving the living wage.
Expected changes
- [Example URL](https://www.gov.uk/am-i-getting-minimum-wage/y/current_payment_april_2016) - Should now ask "How old will you be on 1 April 2016?"
- [Example URL](https://www.gov.uk/am-i-getting-minimum-wage/y/current_payment_april_2016/25/7/40.0/300.0/0.0/no) - Outcome should say "You will be getting the national living wage"
- [Example URL](https://www.gov.uk/am-i-getting-minimum-wage/y/current_payment_april_2016/25/7/40.0/280.0/0.0/no) - Outcome should include "You are getting the National Minimum wage but your pay should be increased to at least the national living wage from 1 April 2016."
- [Example URL](https://www.gov.uk/am-i-getting-minimum-wage/y/current_payment_april_2016/25/7/40.0/200.0/0.0/no) - Outcome should include callout "Your actual pay should increase to at least £7.20 per hour from 1 April 2016."
- [Example URL](https://www.gov.uk/am-i-getting-minimum-wage/y/current_payment/not_an_apprentice/33/5/33.0/333.0/3.0/3.0/no) - Asac helpline should be in bold text, and on separate line