Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Release] Run binary RC verification jobs in apache/arrow #45675

Closed
kou opened this issue Mar 5, 2025 · 2 comments
Closed

[Release] Run binary RC verification jobs in apache/arrow #45675

kou opened this issue Mar 5, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@kou
Copy link
Member

kou commented Mar 5, 2025

Describe the enhancement requested

This is for #45548.

Currently, binary RC verification jobs are run in ursacomputing/crossbow via dev/tasks/tasks.yml and Crossbow. But we don't need to use Crossbow for them because we can't run them nightly.

If we use apache/arrow not ursacomputing/crossbow, we can implement #45548 easily.

Component(s)

Release

@assignUser
Copy link
Member

+1 we have enough CI capacity for it (we could pull over even more crossbow jobs actually) but these are only run for the release, so no problem at all.

kou added a commit to kou/arrow that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2025
kou added a commit to kou/arrow that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2025
kou added a commit to kou/arrow that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2025
raulcd pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2025
…45699)

### Rationale for this change

We don't need to run binary RC verification jobs by Crossbow because they are only used when we release RC. So they are not heavy for us.

### What changes are included in this PR?

Move binary RC verification jobs to `.github/workflows/verify_rc.yml` from `dev/tasks/`

### Are these changes tested?

Yes.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

No.
* GitHub Issue: #45675

Authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <kou@clear-code.com>
Signed-off-by: Raúl Cumplido <raulcumplido@gmail.com>
@raulcd raulcd added this to the 20.0.0 milestone Mar 10, 2025
@raulcd
Copy link
Member

raulcd commented Mar 10, 2025

Issue resolved by pull request 45699
#45699

@raulcd raulcd closed this as completed Mar 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants