Remove tags & retries tests since they're not applicable to most projects

[BasPH]

Removing the pytest cases testing for DAG tags & retries, following discussion in https://astronomer.slack.com/archives/CL44PA4DB/p1680001384869019.

Most customers don't have tags & retries configured on all DAGs so I don't think we should enforce that via tests.

Description

Describe the purpose of this pull request.

🎟 Issue(s)

• Wordage is confusing and inaccurate #1115

🧪 Functional Testing

Tested change by doing a fresh astro dev init and running astro dev pytest successfully.

📸 Screenshots

Add screenshots to illustrate the validity of these changes.

📋 Checklist

• Rebased from the main (or release if patching) branch (before testing)
• Ran make test before taking out of draft
• Ran make lint before taking out of draft
• Added/updated applicable tests
• Tested against Astro-API (if necessary).
• Tested against Houston-API and Astronomer (if necessary).
• Communicated to/tagged owners of respective clients potentially impacted by these changes.
• Updated any related documentation

[dylanbstorey]

I'm also in favor of this as its an opinionated style piece that is non obvious and not "generally" applicable. Maybe just comment them out and allow people to see what the tests look like and do what they will vs full deletion though ?

[BasPH]

I'd rather explain that in docs than having commented code, for example under https://docs.astronomer.io/astro/test-and-troubleshoot-locally#run-tests-with-pytest or https://docs.astronomer.io/astro/cli/astro-dev-pytest.

[dylanbstorey]

Should we open a matching issue with our docs page ?

[sunkickr]

@dylanbstorey @BasPH has a docs issues been opened yet?

[dylanbstorey]

A general issue was opened on this subject, not 100% sure where its at though.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (89aeb92) 87.75% compared to head (18bd1f5) 87.75%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1146   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   87.75%   87.75%           
=======================================
  Files         108      108           
  Lines       11199    11199           
=======================================
  Hits         9828     9828           
  Misses        809      809           
  Partials      562      562           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[kushalmalani]

@BasPH Is this good to merge?

[erdos2n]

I've written a similar issue where we don't delete the pytest but we can skip them using a variable. The PyTest is helpful and from a reliability perspective helps customers with DAG integrity, but it should be configurable.

Issue #1398

[erdos2n]

@BasPH can we close this PR? This looks to be handled by PR #1404