Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Duplicate] Add support for bind mounts under /tmp with hermetic tmp #20774

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

iancha1992
Copy link
Member

This is achieved by rewriting the user-specified mounts to mounts onto subdirectories of the hermetic sandbox tmp directory.

Fixes #20527

Closes #20583.

Commit 5e68afd

PiperOrigin-RevId: 595815029
Change-Id: Ibfe5f67fb8fb59131b6c82a826ed5200f2b10a94

This is achieved by rewriting the user-specified mounts to mounts onto subdirectories of the hermetic sandbox tmp directory.

Fixes bazelbuild#20527

Closes bazelbuild#20583.

PiperOrigin-RevId: 595815029
Change-Id: Ibfe5f67fb8fb59131b6c82a826ed5200f2b10a94
@iancha1992 iancha1992 added team-Local-Exec Issues and PRs for the Execution (Local) team awaiting-review PR is awaiting review from an assigned reviewer labels Jan 6, 2024
@iancha1992 iancha1992 requested a review from lberki January 6, 2024 00:21
@iancha1992 iancha1992 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 6, 2024 00:21
@iancha1992 iancha1992 enabled auto-merge January 6, 2024 00:21
@iancha1992 iancha1992 closed this Jan 6, 2024
auto-merge was automatically disabled January 6, 2024 00:22

Pull request was closed

@iancha1992 iancha1992 changed the title [7.1.0] Add support for bind mounts under /tmp with hermetic tmp [Duplicate] Add support for bind mounts under /tmp with hermetic tmp Jan 6, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the awaiting-review PR is awaiting review from an assigned reviewer label Jan 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
team-Local-Exec Issues and PRs for the Execution (Local) team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants