Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add --total option to enable visualization of time spent not within a sub #14

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2013

Conversation

timbunce
Copy link
Contributor

This simply makes the "all" line at the bottom of the flame graph wider.

brendangregg added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2013
Add --total option to enable visualization of time spent not within a sub
@brendangregg brendangregg merged commit 19eac63 into brendangregg:master Mar 25, 2013
@brendangregg
Copy link
Owner

ok, I think I figured out a use case: I could micro-benchmark over a fixed time interval, say for non-regression testing, and then show each flame graph over the same time range to match the interval (with the missing samples due to off-CPU blocking).

smitty3268 added a commit to smitty3268/inferno that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2019
The use case for this option is comparing multiple perf runs directly against one another. Specifying the # of samples to use for the total width means the individual rectangles in each graph can be directly compared to each other rather than being resized differently if one run finished more quickly than another.
smitty3268 added a commit to smitty3268/inferno that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2019
The use case for this option is comparing multiple perf runs directly against one another. Specifying the # of samples to use for the total width means the individual rectangles in each graph can be directly compared to each other rather than being resized differently if one run finished more quickly than another.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants