Isolating E2E test suite from seed script #1192
Conversation
|
@JohnAllenTech is attempting to deploy a commit to the Codú Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve the removal and addition of functions and constants related to end-to-end (E2E) user and session management across three files: Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
JohnAllenTech
temporarily deployed
to
production
GitHub Actions
Inactive
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
e2e/teardown.ts (1)
10-11: Fix typo in comment.
There's a typo in the comment: "test suit" should be "test suite".
- // the test suit adds posts created by the E2E users. We want to remove them between test runs
+ // the test suite adds posts created by the E2E users. We want to remove them between test runsAlso applies to: 14-15
e2e/setup.ts (1)
Line range hint 16-20: Consider centralizing database connection configuration.
The database connection setup could be moved to a shared configuration file to maintain consistency across different parts of the application and avoid duplication.
Consider creating a shared database utility:
// e2e/utils/db.ts
export const getTestDB = () => {
return drizzle(
postgres(process.env.TEST_DATABASE_URL || "postgresql://postgres:secret@127.0.0.1:5432/postgres")
);
};📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- drizzle/seed.ts (0 hunks)
- e2e/setup.ts (2 hunks)
- e2e/teardown.ts (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- drizzle/seed.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
e2e/teardown.ts (1)
Learnt from: JohnAllenTech
PR: codu-code/codu#1162
File: e2e/teardown.ts:12-19
Timestamp: 2024-10-20T21:21:06.941Z
Learning: In the `e2e/teardown.ts` script, when cleaning up the database for Playwright E2E tests, prefer not to wrap deletions in a transaction because partial deletions are acceptable in case of failure.
🔇 Additional comments (3)
e2e/teardown.ts (1)
8-19: Verify database schema constraints.
Let's verify the database schema to confirm the relationships between tables and ensure our deletion order is correct.
✅ Verification successful
Deletion order in teardown is correct and safe
The database schema verification confirms that all related tables (Post, Comment) have ON DELETE CASCADE constraints referencing the User table. This means deleting users will automatically cascade and remove their associated posts and comments, making the current deletion order in the teardown script safe and efficient.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check database schema for foreign key relationships
# Test: Search for table definitions and foreign key constraints
rg -A 10 'CREATE TABLE|FOREIGN KEY' drizzle/
Length of output: 52559
e2e/setup.ts (2)
3-11: LGTM! Imports are properly organized.
The new imports for session, user schema, and E2E constants are correctly added to support the isolated E2E test setup functionality.
112-132: Verify the setup sequence and error propagation.
The setup sequence looks good with parallel user creation followed by session creation. However, let's verify that this order is maintained across the codebase and that errors are properly propagated.
Let's verify the setup sequence in other test files:
✅ Verification successful
Setup sequence and error handling are properly implemented
The verification shows that:
- The setup sequence is correctly ordered with parallel user creation followed by session creation
- Error handling is implemented at the top level in the setup function
- The setup function is self-contained and properly exports for test usage
- The teardown process correctly cleans up the created users and their associated data
- User sessions are properly created after user creation, maintaining data consistency
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any direct dependencies on these users/sessions in test files
# and ensure they're created after setup is called
echo "Checking for E2E user/session dependencies:"
rg -l "E2E_USER_(ONE|TWO)_(EMAIL|ID|SESSION)" e2e/
Length of output: 224
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of these files to understand the dependencies and sequence
echo "=== Checking teardown.ts ==="
rg "E2E_USER_(ONE|TWO)" -A 3 e2e/teardown.ts
echo -e "\n=== Checking utils.ts ==="
rg "E2E_USER_(ONE|TWO)" -A 3 e2e/utils/utils.ts
echo -e "\n=== Checking constants.ts ==="
cat e2e/constants/constants.ts
echo -e "\n=== Checking setup sequence in test files ==="
# Look for setup imports and usage
rg "import.*setup" e2e/ --type ts
rg "setup\(" e2e/ --type ts -A 2
Length of output: 2651
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how setup is being used in test files and its sequence
echo "=== Checking test files for setup usage ==="
rg "setup|beforeAll" e2e/ --type ts -B 2 -A 2
echo -e "\n=== Checking seedE2EUser and seedE2EUserSession implementations ==="
rg "seedE2EUser|seedE2EUserSession" e2e/ --type ts -B 2 -A 2
echo -e "\n=== Checking for any error handling in setup related functions ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
$$$
} catch ($err) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2174
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
✨ Codu Pull Request 💻
Removing the E2E test suites dependency on the seed script. This will make future enhancements to the seed script much easier
Pull Request details
Any Breaking changes
Associated Screenshots
[Optional] What gif best describes this PR or how it makes you feel