Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

plugin/kubernetes: Return all records with matching IP for PTR requests #3687

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 21, 2020

Conversation

chrisohaver
Copy link
Member

1. Why is this pull request needed and what does it do?

For PTR requests of an Endpoint that has two or more Services pointed to it, provide an answer for each Service. Previously, we were arbitrarily selecting the first one encountered (based on ordering in the index).

2. Which issues (if any) are related?

#3686

3. Which documentation changes (if any) need to be made?

none

4. Does this introduce a backward incompatible change or deprecation?

no

Signed-off-by: Chris O'Haver <cohaver@infoblox.com>
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #3687 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3687      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.65%   56.67%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         220      220              
  Lines       11059    11060       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         6266     6268       +2     
+ Misses       4311     4310       -1     
  Partials      482      482
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
plugin/kubernetes/reverse.go 84% <100%> (+0.66%) ⬆️
plugin/file/reload.go 69.44% <0%> (-5.56%) ⬇️
plugin/route53/route53.go 86.61% <0%> (+2.11%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ed1841c...493b977. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants