-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
MatrixMorphology
INFLECTED is a top-level attribute with an AVM of "flags" as its value. Flags model the co-occurrence restrictions between lexical types and lexical rule types, and draw their values from the luk hierarchy.
The following patterns are, or should be, implemented to ensure the morphotactic system is working properly:
Test | Details | Implemented |
morph-optional-pc | One PC, takes one LT as input, optional | No |
morph-oblig-pc | One PC, takes one LT as input, obligatory | No |
morph-optional-pc-lt1-requires | One PC, takes two LTs as input, one LT requires PC | No |
morph-2nd-pc-req-lrt1 | Two sequential PCs, two LTs, oblig PC1 takes both as input, opt PC2 requires LT1 | No |
morph-2nd-pc-fbd-lrt1 | Two sequential PCs, two LTs, oblig PC1 takes both as input, opt PC2 forbids LT1 | No |
morph-implicit-disj | Two non-sequential PCs, one LT requires both separately, disjunctive flag created | No |
morph-explicit-disj | Two non-sequential PCs, one LT disjunctively requires both, disjunctive flag created | No |
Note that some tests may be collapsed.
(pre-O'Hara description?)
O'Hara added TRACK variables for co-occurrence restrictions and planning of lexeme-to-lexeme and lexeme-to-word (sometimes word-to-lexeme) rules to handle obligatory rules. [http://www.delph-in.net/matrix/kohara-thesis.pdf O'Hara 2008]
Goodman merged TRACK into INFLECTED so co-occurrence constraints directly affect lexical integrity (ability to use lexemes with syntactic (phrasal) rules. [http://makino.linguist.univ-paris-diderot.fr/files/hpsg2010/file/abstracts/MFG/goodman-bender-mfg.pdf Goodman and Bender 2010]
Home | Forum | Discussions | Events