Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update iojs to v1.8.1 #667

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 21, 2015
Merged

Conversation

Starefossen
Copy link
Contributor

This PR updated io.js to v1.8.1

Changeset: nodejs/docker-iojs@dc31c...4cf03
Signed-off-by: Hans Kristian Flaatten hans.kristian.flaatten@turistforeningen.no

PR-URL: docker-library#667
Related: nodejs/docker-iojs#54

Signed-off-by: Hans Kristian Flaatten <hans.kristian.flaatten@turistforeningen.no>
@yosifkit
Copy link
Member

LGTM, Build test of #667; e6a03a8 (iojs):

$ url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/docker-library/official-images/e6a03a828bb65c028afeeaa590ea7f970cd8c549/library/iojs"
$ bashbrew build "$url"
Fetching iojs (git://github.com/iojs/docker-iojs) ...
Processing iojs:1.8.1 ...
Processing iojs:1.8 ...
Processing iojs:1 ...
Processing iojs:latest ...
Processing iojs:1.8.1-onbuild ...
Processing iojs:1.8-onbuild ...
Processing iojs:1-onbuild ...
Processing iojs:onbuild ...
Processing iojs:1.8.1-slim ...
Processing iojs:1.8-slim ...
Processing iojs:1-slim ...
Processing iojs:slim ...
$ bashbrew list "$url" --uniq | xargs test/run.sh
testing iojs:1.8.1
    'utc' [1/2]...passed
    'cve-2014--shellshock' [2/2]...passed
testing iojs:1.8.1-onbuild
    'utc' [1/2]...passed
    'cve-2014--shellshock' [2/2]...passed
testing iojs:1.8.1-slim
    'utc' [1/2]...passed
    'cve-2014--shellshock' [2/2]...passed

@tianon
Copy link
Member

tianon commented Apr 21, 2015

LGTM

tianon added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2015
@tianon tianon merged commit 1c5353f into docker-library:master Apr 21, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants