Blazor <head> modification using a section-based approach (preview7) #34518
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MackinnonBuck
requested review from
javiercn,
pranavkm and
a team
as code owners
mkArtakMSFT
added
the
Servicing-consider
|
Hello human! Please make sure you've included the Shiproom Template in a comment or (preferably) the PR description. Also, make sure this PR is not marked as a draft and is ready-to-merge. |
Pilchie
removed
the
Servicing-consider
|
This was approved for Preview 7 by tactics this morning. |
pranavkm
approved these changes
Jul 20, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR introduces a way for developers to modify the HTML
<head>contents from Blazor.Customer Impact
With this feature, customers will be able to easily
Other SPA frameworks have third-party libraries enabling
<head>modification, so this change makes Blazor an even more viable alternative.Regression?
Risk
This change is almost entirely additive, so there's little risk of introducing a regression.
Verification
Packaging changes reviewed?
Addresses #25705