Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support objects in complex types, Fixes: #65 #71

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2019
Merged

Support objects in complex types, Fixes: #65 #71

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2019

Conversation

ggere
Copy link
Contributor

@ggere ggere commented Apr 10, 2019

Adds object handling to resolveComplexTypeName, Fixes: #65

Note: for #65 there must be a space after the colon in the object definition or jsdoc doesn't parse it correctly.

// Bad:
newChannels:Channel[]
// Good:
newChannels: Channel[]

@englercj
Copy link
Owner

englercj commented Apr 11, 2019

Is this even supported JSDoc syntax? I don't think I've seen this anywhere before.

Nvm, I misread what was going on.

@englercj englercj merged commit fa8a767 into englercj:master Apr 11, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Promise that resolves an object with a generic type parameter as array is unable to be resolved
2 participants