Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pass meta to validator #61

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 27, 2021
Merged

Conversation

dylanjm
Copy link
Collaborator

@dylanjm dylanjm commented Jan 22, 2021


Pull Request Description

What issue does this change request address?

Refs #60

What are the significant changes in functionality due to this change request?

This commit add the meta variable as a parameter to the Validator class method
validate.


For Change Control Board: Change Request Review

The following review must be completed by an authorized member of the Change Control Board.

  • 1. Review all computer code.
  • 2. If any changes occur to the input syntax, there must be an accompanying change to the user manual and xsd schema. If the input syntax change deprecates existing input files, a conversion script needs to be added (see Conversion Scripts).
  • 3. Make sure the Python code and commenting standards are respected (camelBack, etc.) - See on the wiki for details.
  • 4. Automated Tests should pass.
  • 5. If significant functionality is added, there must be tests added to check this. Tests should cover all possible options. Multiple short tests are preferred over one large tes.
  • 6. If the change modifies or adds a requirement or a requirement based test case, the Change Control Board's Chair or designee also needs to approve the change. The requirements and the requirements test shall be in sync.
  • 7. The merge request must reference an issue. If the issue is closed, the issue close checklist shall be done.
  • 8. If an analytic test is changed/added, the the analytic documentation must be updated/added.
  • 9. If any test used as a basis for documentation examples have been changed, the associated documentation must be reviewed and assured the text matches the example.

PaulTalbot-INL
PaulTalbot-INL previously approved these changes Jan 22, 2021
Copy link
Collaborator

@PaulTalbot-INL PaulTalbot-INL left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great.

@PaulTalbot-INL PaulTalbot-INL mentioned this pull request Jan 22, 2021
10 tasks
@moosebuild
Copy link
Collaborator

Job CentOS 8 on 7681f0e : invalidated by @PaulTalbot-INL

new relevant RAVEN merge requires resetting tests

@@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ def validate(self, components, dispatch, times, meta):
for res in info:
for t, time in enumerate(times):
current = dispatch.get_activity(comp, res, time)
if comp.get_interaction().is_type('Storage'):
init_level = comp.get_interaction().get_initial_level(meta)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this isn't a required change, but if you have to change something anyway, you could extend this if with and t == 0 just to prevent bad copy-paste mistakes, possibly.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, I added the additional condition

@dylanjm
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dylanjm commented Jan 27, 2021

@PaulTalbot-INL This is ready for review. Thanks.

@PaulTalbot-INL PaulTalbot-INL linked an issue Jan 27, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request
10 tasks
@PaulTalbot-INL PaulTalbot-INL merged commit 281b658 into idaholab:devel Jan 27, 2021
@dylanjm dylanjm deleted the meta-to-validator branch January 27, 2021 19:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[TASK] Pass "meta" to Validator
3 participants