-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Node memory swap support #2400
Comments
/stage alpha |
Greetings @ehashman!
Thanks! |
All of this is covered in #2602 |
Greetings @ehashman! Thanks! |
Work breakdown for 1.22
External to k8s but still need to happen:
Once the above CRI updates happen, ensure that CI environment is using latest container runtimes with updated CRI. |
Greetings @ehashman , |
Greetings @ehashman,
Thanks! |
PR just merged. Docs placeholder is kubernetes/website#28838 |
Awesome! Thanks for the update. Moving this to "Tracked". |
We are good to go for 1.22! Docs complete. |
/milestone v1.23 |
/stage beta |
Hello @iholder101 @kannon92 @pacoxu 👋, v1.33 Enhancements team here. Just checking in as we approach enhancements freeze on 02:00 UTC Friday 14th February 2025 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 13th February 2025. This enhancement is targeting stage Here's where this enhancement currently stands:
For this KEP, we would need to update the following:
The status of this enhancement is marked as If you anticipate missing enhancements freeze, you can file an exception request in advance. Thank you! |
Hi @iholder101 @kannon92 @pacoxu 👋, 1.33 Enhancements team here, Just a quick friendly reminder as we approach the enhancements freeze later this week, at 02:00 UTC Friday 14th February 2025 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 13th February 2025. The current status of this enhancement is marked as If you anticipate missing enhancements freeze, you can file an exception request in advance. Thank you! |
Hello @iholder101 @kannon92 @pacoxu 👋, v1.33 Enhancements team here. Unfortunately, this enhancement did not meet requirements for enhancements freeze. If you still wish to progress this enhancement in v1.33, please file an exception request as soon as possible, within three days. If you have any questions, you can reach out in the #release-enhancements channel on Slack and we'll be happy to help. Thanks! Missing section from the KEP README
/milestone clear |
It looks like the update PR merged @dipesh-rawat are we missing anything here? |
@haircommander The KEP README has few checklist items missing under the 'Release Signoff Checklist' section based on the latest template (here).
|
thanks @dipesh-rawat we missed that. I opened #5174 and filed an extension. if that merges, will this KEP be tracked? |
@haircommander Thanks a lot for raising the PR #5174 promptly to fix the outstanding issue. Yes, since the exception request is approved, once the PR #5174 is merged, we can add this to the milestone and track it for the 1.33 release. |
@dipesh-rawat PR merged, all set here? |
@haircommander (and @iholder101 @kannon92 @pacoxu) Now that PRs #5174 has been merged, all the KEP requirements are in place and merged into k/enhancements, this enhancement is all good for the upcoming enhancements freeze. 🚀 The status of this enhancement is marked as /milestone v1.33 |
Hello, @iholder101 @kannon92 @haircommander @pacoxu 👋, v1.33 Docs Shadow here. Does this enhancement work planned for v1.33 require any new docs or modifications to existing docs? If so, please follow the steps here to open a PR against the dev-1.33 branch in the k/website repo. This PR can be just a placeholder at this time and must be created before Thursday 27th February 2025 18:00 PDT. Also, take a look at Documenting for a release to get yourself familiarized with the docs requirement for the release. Thank you! |
Hi @iholder101 @kannon92 @haircommander @pacoxu 👋 v1.33 Docs Lead here. Gentle reminder! The deadline to raise a placeholder Docs PR is Thursday 27th February 2025 18:00 PDT. Thanks! |
sorry for the delay, I've opened kubernetes/website#49945 |
Thanks @haircommander |
Hi @iholder101 @kannon92 @pacoxu @haircommander 👋 -- this is Agustina (@aibarbetta) from the 1.33 Communications Team! For the 1.33 release, we are currently in the process of collecting and curating a list of potential feature blogs, and we'd love for you to consider writing one for your enhancement! As you may be aware, feature blogs are a great way to communicate to users about features which fall into (but not limited to) the following categories:
To opt in to write a feature blog, could you please let us know and open a "Feature Blog placeholder PR" (which can be only a skeleton at first) against the website repository by Wednesday, 5th March, 2025? For more information about writing a blog, please find the blog contribution guidelines 📚 Tip Some timeline to keep in mind:
Note In your placeholder PR, use |
Hey again @iholder101 @kannon92 @pacoxu 👋, 1.33 Enhancements team here, Just checking in as we approach code freeze at 02:00 UTC Friday 21st March 2025 / 19:00 PDT Thursday 20th March 2025. . Here's where this enhancement currently stands:
For this enhancement, it looks like the following PRs need to be merged before code freeze (and we need to update the Issue description to include all the related PRs of this KEP):
Additionally, please let me know if there are any other PRs in k/k not listed above that we should track for this KEP, so that we can maintain accurate status. If you anticipate missing code freeze, you can file an exception request in advance. The status of this enhancement is marked as |
Hi @iholder101 @kannon92 @pacoxu 👋, 1.33 Communications Team here again! This is a gentle reminder for the feature blog deadline mentioned above, which is 02:00 UTC Wednesday, 5th March, 2025. I see a blog was written when this feature was in Tip Some timeline to keep in mind:
Note In your placeholder PR, use |
Hello, The docs reads:
Will this limitation be removed in the future? (using mlockall or other) |
This is how tmpfs works inside the Linux kernel. If you really don't want tmpfs to swap you could use ramfs instead but I personally would not recommend that. If you are worried about somebody steeling your swap disk you might want to enable encrypted swap instead. I guess those are underlying things in Linux. Swap behaviour of tmpfs is not a Kubernetes thing - this is the default Linux behaviour which we just did not have due to disabled swap. |
Hey @sathieu! For more info, see implementation here: kubernetes/kubernetes#124060. |
Enhancement Description
k/enhancements
) update PR(s): Node system swap support #2602k/k
) update PR(s):k/website
) update PR(s): KEP-2400: Alpha node support for swap memory website#28838k/enhancements
) update PR(s):k/k
) update PR(s):/stats/summary
and/metrics/resource
/stats/summary
and/metrics/resource
) kubernetes#118865/stats/summary
and/metrics/resource
) kubernetes#118865k/website
) update(s):k/enhancements
) update PR(s):k/k
) update PR(s):Add swap conformance tests kubernetes#122175Fail Kubelet at startup if swap is configured with cgroup v1 kubernetes#122241k/website
) update(s):k/enhancements
) update PR(s): [KEP-2400] swap updates, beta3 graduation and GA criterias #4701k/k
) update PR(s):k/website
) update(s):k/enhancements
) update PR(s):k/k
) update PR(s):[KEP-2400] Add the ability to set a system-reserved quantity of swap on a node kubernetes#105019dup by 120802add --system-reserved support for swap(cgroup v2 only): only for burstable pods kubernetes#105271Fail Kubelet at startup if swap is configured with cgroup v1 kubernetes#119327k/website
) update(s):Please keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team to track the evolution of the enhancement efficiently.
/sig node
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: