-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
how can I get cpu model name and phisical number ,cores call linux function? #2
Comments
Hi, this repo is not for general Linux questions. |
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2019
[ Upstream commit 5518424 ] ifmsh->csa is an RCU-protected pointer. The writer context in ieee80211_mesh_finish_csa() is already mutually exclusive with wdev->sdata.mtx, but the RCU checker did not know this. Use rcu_dereference_protected() to avoid a warning. fixes the following warning: [ 12.519089] ============================= [ 12.520042] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 12.520652] 5.1.0-rc7-wt+ #16 Tainted: G W [ 12.521409] ----------------------------- [ 12.521972] net/mac80211/mesh.c:1223 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [ 12.522928] other info that might help us debug this: [ 12.523984] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 12.524855] 5 locks held by kworker/u8:2/152: [ 12.525438] #0: 00000000057be08c ((wq_completion)phy0){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1a2/0x620 [ 12.526607] #1: 0000000059c6b07a ((work_completion)(&sdata->csa_finalize_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1a2/0x620 [ 12.528001] #2: 00000000f184ba7d (&wdev->mtx){+.+.}, at: ieee80211_csa_finalize_work+0x2f/0x90 [ 12.529116] #3: 00000000831a1f54 (&local->mtx){+.+.}, at: ieee80211_csa_finalize_work+0x47/0x90 [ 12.530233] #4: 00000000fd06f988 (&local->chanctx_mtx){+.+.}, at: ieee80211_csa_finalize_work+0x51/0x90 Signed-off-by: Thomas Pedersen <thomas@eero.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2019
[ Upstream commit 6da9f77 ] When debugging options are turned on, the rcu_read_lock() function might not be inlined. This results in lockdep's print_lock() function printing "rcu_read_lock+0x0/0x70" instead of rcu_read_lock()'s caller. For example: [ 10.579995] ============================= [ 10.584033] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 10.588074] 4.18.0.memcg_v2+ #1 Not tainted [ 10.593162] ----------------------------- [ 10.597203] include/linux/rcupdate.h:281 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section! [ 10.606220] [ 10.606220] other info that might help us debug this: [ 10.606220] [ 10.614280] [ 10.614280] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 10.620853] 3 locks held by systemd/1: [ 10.624632] #0: (____ptrval____) (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#5){.+.+}, at: lookup_slow+0x42/0x70 [ 10.633232] #1: (____ptrval____) (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: rcu_read_lock+0x0/0x70 [ 10.640954] #2: (____ptrval____) (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: rcu_read_lock+0x0/0x70 These "rcu_read_lock+0x0/0x70" strings are not providing any useful information. This commit therefore forces inlining of the rcu_read_lock() function so that rcu_read_lock()'s caller is instead shown. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2019
[ Upstream commit 3f167e1 ] ipv4_pdp_add() is called in RCU read-side critical section. So GFP_KERNEL should not be used in the function. This patch make ipv4_pdp_add() to use GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL. Test commands: gtp-link add gtp1 & gtp-tunnel add gtp1 v1 100 200 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 Splat looks like: [ 130.618881] ============================= [ 130.626382] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 130.626994] 5.2.0-rc6+ #50 Not tainted [ 130.627622] ----------------------------- [ 130.628223] ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:266 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section! [ 130.629684] [ 130.629684] other info that might help us debug this: [ 130.629684] [ 130.631022] [ 130.631022] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 130.632136] 4 locks held by gtp-tunnel/1025: [ 130.632925] #0: 000000002b93c8b7 (cb_lock){++++}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 [ 130.634159] #1: 00000000f17bc999 (genl_mutex){+.+.}, at: genl_rcv_msg+0xfb/0x130 [ 130.635487] #2: 00000000c644ed8e (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: gtp_genl_new_pdp+0x18c/0x1150 [gtp] [ 130.636936] #3: 0000000007a1cde7 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: gtp_genl_new_pdp+0x187/0x1150 [gtp] [ 130.638348] [ 130.638348] stack backtrace: [ 130.639062] CPU: 1 PID: 1025 Comm: gtp-tunnel Not tainted 5.2.0-rc6+ #50 [ 130.641318] Call Trace: [ 130.641707] dump_stack+0x7c/0xbb [ 130.642252] ___might_sleep+0x2c0/0x3b0 [ 130.642862] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1cd/0x2b0 [ 130.643591] gtp_genl_new_pdp+0x6c5/0x1150 [gtp] [ 130.644371] genl_family_rcv_msg+0x63a/0x1030 [ 130.645074] ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1090/0x1090 [ 130.645845] ? genl_unregister_family+0x630/0x630 [ 130.646592] ? debug_show_all_locks+0x2d0/0x2d0 [ 130.647293] ? check_flags.part.40+0x440/0x440 [ 130.648099] genl_rcv_msg+0xa3/0x130 [ ... ] Fixes: 459aa66 ("gtp: add initial driver for datapath of GPRS Tunneling Protocol (GTP-U)") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2019
[ Upstream commit 181fa43 ] According to the PCI Local Bus specification Revision 3.0, section 6.8.1.3 (Message Control for MSI), endpoints that are Multiple Message Capable as defined by bits [3:1] in the Message Control for MSI can request a number of vectors that is power of two aligned. As specified in section 6.8.1.6 "Message data for MSI", the Multiple Message Enable field (bits [6:4] of the Message Control register) defines the number of low order message data bits the function is permitted to modify to generate its system software allocated vectors. The MSI controller in the Xilinx NWL PCIe controller supports a number of MSI vectors specified through a bitmap and the hwirq number for an MSI, that is the value written in the MSI data TLP is determined by the bitmap allocation. For instance, in a situation where two endpoints sitting on the PCI bus request the following MSI configuration, with the current PCI Xilinx bitmap allocation code (that does not align MSI vector allocation on a power of two boundary): Endpoint #1: Requesting 1 MSI vector - allocated bitmap bits 0 Endpoint #2: Requesting 2 MSI vectors - allocated bitmap bits [1,2] The bitmap value(s) corresponds to the hwirq number that is programmed into the Message Data for MSI field in the endpoint MSI capability and is detected by the root complex to fire the corresponding MSI irqs. The value written in Message Data for MSI field corresponds to the first bit allocated in the bitmap for Multi MSI vectors. The current Xilinx NWL MSI allocation code allows a bitmap allocation that is not a power of two boundaries, so endpoint #2, is allowed to toggle Message Data bit[0] to differentiate between its two vectors (meaning that the MSI data will be respectively 0x0 and 0x1 for the two vectors allocated to endpoint #2). This clearly aliases with the Endpoint #1 vector allocation, resulting in a broken Multi MSI implementation. Update the code to allocate MSI bitmap ranges with a power of two alignment, fixing the bug. Fixes: ab597d3 ("PCI: xilinx-nwl: Add support for Xilinx NWL PCIe Host Controller") Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com> [lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com: updated commit log] Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2019
[ Upstream commit 80e5302 ] An impending change to enable HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT on powerpc leads to warnings such as the following: # modprobe kprobe_example ftrace-powerpc: Not expected bl: opcode is 3c4c0001 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 227 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2001 ftrace_bug+0x90/0x318 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 227 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 5.2.0-rc6-00678-g1c329100b942 #2 NIP: c000000000264318 LR: c00000000025d694 CTR: c000000000f5cd30 REGS: c000000001f2b7b0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (5.2.0-rc6-00678-g1c329100b942) MSR: 900000010282b033 <SF,HV,VEC,VSX,EE,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE,TM[E]> CR: 28228222 XER: 00000000 CFAR: c0000000002642fc IRQMASK: 0 <snip> NIP [c000000000264318] ftrace_bug+0x90/0x318 LR [c00000000025d694] ftrace_process_locs+0x4f4/0x5e0 Call Trace: [c000000001f2ba40] [0000000000000004] 0x4 (unreliable) [c000000001f2bad0] [c00000000025d694] ftrace_process_locs+0x4f4/0x5e0 [c000000001f2bb90] [c00000000020ff10] load_module+0x25b0/0x30c0 [c000000001f2bd00] [c000000000210cb0] sys_finit_module+0xc0/0x130 [c000000001f2be20] [c00000000000bda4] system_call+0x5c/0x70 Instruction dump: 419e0018 2f83ffff 419e00bc 2f83ffea 409e00cc 4800001c 0fe00000 3c62ff96 39000001 39400000 386386d0 480000c4 <0fe00000> 3ce20003 39000001 3c62ff96 ---[ end trace 4c438d5cebf78381 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c0080000012a0008>] 0xc0080000012a0008 actual: 01:00:4c:3c Initializing ftrace call sites ftrace record flags: 2000000 (0) expected tramp: c00000000006af4c Looking at the relocation records in __mcount_loc shows a few spurious entries: RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [__mcount_loc]: OFFSET TYPE VALUE 0000000000000000 R_PPC64_ADDR64 .text.unlikely+0x0000000000000008 0000000000000008 R_PPC64_ADDR64 .text.unlikely+0x0000000000000014 0000000000000010 R_PPC64_ADDR64 .text.unlikely+0x0000000000000060 0000000000000018 R_PPC64_ADDR64 .text.unlikely+0x00000000000000b4 0000000000000020 R_PPC64_ADDR64 .init.text+0x0000000000000008 0000000000000028 R_PPC64_ADDR64 .init.text+0x0000000000000014 The first entry in each section is incorrect. Looking at the relocation records, the spurious entries correspond to the R_PPC64_ENTRY records: RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.text.unlikely]: OFFSET TYPE VALUE 0000000000000000 R_PPC64_REL64 .TOC.-0x0000000000000008 0000000000000008 R_PPC64_ENTRY *ABS* 0000000000000014 R_PPC64_REL24 _mcount <snip> The problem is that we are not validating the return value from get_mcountsym() in sift_rel_mcount(). With this entry, mcountsym is 0, but Elf_r_sym(relp) also ends up being 0. Fix this by ensuring mcountsym is valid before processing the entry. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Tested-by: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2019
commit cf3591e upstream. Revert the commit bd293d0. The proper fix has been made available with commit d0a255e ("loop: set PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO for the worker thread"). Note that the fix offered by commit bd293d0 doesn't really prevent the deadlock from occuring - if we look at the stacktrace reported by Junxiao Bi, we see that it hangs in bit_wait_io and not on the mutex - i.e. it has already successfully taken the mutex. Changing the mutex from mutex_lock to mutex_trylock won't help with deadlocks that happen afterwards. PID: 474 TASK: ffff8813e11f4600 CPU: 10 COMMAND: "kswapd0" #0 [ffff8813dedfb938] __schedule at ffffffff8173f405 #1 [ffff8813dedfb990] schedule at ffffffff8173fa27 #2 [ffff8813dedfb9b0] schedule_timeout at ffffffff81742fec #3 [ffff8813dedfba60] io_schedule_timeout at ffffffff8173f186 #4 [ffff8813dedfbaa0] bit_wait_io at ffffffff8174034f #5 [ffff8813dedfbac0] __wait_on_bit at ffffffff8173fec8 #6 [ffff8813dedfbb10] out_of_line_wait_on_bit at ffffffff8173ff81 #7 [ffff8813dedfbb90] __make_buffer_clean at ffffffffa038736f [dm_bufio] #8 [ffff8813dedfbbb0] __try_evict_buffer at ffffffffa0387bb8 [dm_bufio] #9 [ffff8813dedfbbd0] dm_bufio_shrink_scan at ffffffffa0387cc3 [dm_bufio] #10 [ffff8813dedfbc40] shrink_slab at ffffffff811a87ce #11 [ffff8813dedfbd30] shrink_zone at ffffffff811ad778 #12 [ffff8813dedfbdc0] kswapd at ffffffff811ae92f #13 [ffff8813dedfbec0] kthread at ffffffff810a8428 #14 [ffff8813dedfbf50] ret_from_fork at ffffffff81745242 Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: bd293d0 ("dm bufio: fix deadlock with loop device") Depends-on: d0a255e ("loop: set PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO for the worker thread") Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2019
[ Upstream commit 86968ef ] Calling ceph_buffer_put() in __ceph_setxattr() may end up freeing the i_xattrs.prealloc_blob buffer while holding the i_ceph_lock. This can be fixed by postponing the call until later, when the lock is released. The following backtrace was triggered by fstests generic/117. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/vmalloc.c:2283 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 650, name: fsstress 3 locks held by fsstress/650: #0: 00000000870a0fe8 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 #1: 00000000ba0c4c74 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6){++++}, at: vfs_setxattr+0x55/0xa0 #2: 000000008dfbb3f2 (&(&ci->i_ceph_lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: __ceph_setxattr+0x297/0x810 CPU: 1 PID: 650 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 5.2.0+ #437 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x67/0x90 ___might_sleep.cold+0x9f/0xb1 vfree+0x4b/0x60 ceph_buffer_release+0x1b/0x60 __ceph_setxattr+0x2b4/0x810 __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x59/0xf0 vfs_setxattr+0x81/0xa0 setxattr+0x115/0x230 ? filename_lookup+0xc9/0x140 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x74/0x80 ? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x2e/0x60 ? __sb_start_write+0x142/0x1a0 ? mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 path_setxattr+0xba/0xd0 __x64_sys_lsetxattr+0x24/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe RIP: 0033:0x7ff23514359a Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2019
[ Upstream commit af8a85a ] Calling ceph_buffer_put() in fill_inode() may result in freeing the i_xattrs.blob buffer while holding the i_ceph_lock. This can be fixed by postponing the call until later, when the lock is released. The following backtrace was triggered by fstests generic/070. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/vmalloc.c:2283 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 3852, name: kworker/0:4 6 locks held by kworker/0:4/3852: #0: 000000004270f6bb ((wq_completion)ceph-msgr){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1b8/0x5f0 #1: 00000000eb420803 ((work_completion)(&(&con->work)->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1b8/0x5f0 #2: 00000000be1c53a4 (&s->s_mutex){+.+.}, at: dispatch+0x288/0x1476 #3: 00000000559cb958 (&mdsc->snap_rwsem){++++}, at: dispatch+0x2eb/0x1476 #4: 000000000d5ebbae (&req->r_fill_mutex){+.+.}, at: dispatch+0x2fc/0x1476 #5: 00000000a83d0514 (&(&ci->i_ceph_lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: fill_inode.isra.0+0xf8/0xf70 CPU: 0 PID: 3852 Comm: kworker/0:4 Not tainted 5.2.0+ #441 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn Call Trace: dump_stack+0x67/0x90 ___might_sleep.cold+0x9f/0xb1 vfree+0x4b/0x60 ceph_buffer_release+0x1b/0x60 fill_inode.isra.0+0xa9b/0xf70 ceph_fill_trace+0x13b/0xc70 ? dispatch+0x2eb/0x1476 dispatch+0x320/0x1476 ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x4d/0x2a0 ceph_con_workfn+0xc97/0x2ec0 ? process_one_work+0x1b8/0x5f0 process_one_work+0x244/0x5f0 worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0 kthread+0x105/0x140 ? process_one_work+0x5f0/0x5f0 ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2019
[ Upstream commit 5518424 ] ifmsh->csa is an RCU-protected pointer. The writer context in ieee80211_mesh_finish_csa() is already mutually exclusive with wdev->sdata.mtx, but the RCU checker did not know this. Use rcu_dereference_protected() to avoid a warning. fixes the following warning: [ 12.519089] ============================= [ 12.520042] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 12.520652] 5.1.0-rc7-wt+ #16 Tainted: G W [ 12.521409] ----------------------------- [ 12.521972] net/mac80211/mesh.c:1223 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! [ 12.522928] other info that might help us debug this: [ 12.523984] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 12.524855] 5 locks held by kworker/u8:2/152: [ 12.525438] #0: 00000000057be08c ((wq_completion)phy0){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1a2/0x620 [ 12.526607] #1: 0000000059c6b07a ((work_completion)(&sdata->csa_finalize_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1a2/0x620 [ 12.528001] #2: 00000000f184ba7d (&wdev->mtx){+.+.}, at: ieee80211_csa_finalize_work+0x2f/0x90 [ 12.529116] #3: 00000000831a1f54 (&local->mtx){+.+.}, at: ieee80211_csa_finalize_work+0x47/0x90 [ 12.530233] #4: 00000000fd06f988 (&local->chanctx_mtx){+.+.}, at: ieee80211_csa_finalize_work+0x51/0x90 Signed-off-by: Thomas Pedersen <thomas@eero.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2019
[ Upstream commit 6da9f77 ] When debugging options are turned on, the rcu_read_lock() function might not be inlined. This results in lockdep's print_lock() function printing "rcu_read_lock+0x0/0x70" instead of rcu_read_lock()'s caller. For example: [ 10.579995] ============================= [ 10.584033] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 10.588074] 4.18.0.memcg_v2+ #1 Not tainted [ 10.593162] ----------------------------- [ 10.597203] include/linux/rcupdate.h:281 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section! [ 10.606220] [ 10.606220] other info that might help us debug this: [ 10.606220] [ 10.614280] [ 10.614280] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 10.620853] 3 locks held by systemd/1: [ 10.624632] #0: (____ptrval____) (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#5){.+.+}, at: lookup_slow+0x42/0x70 [ 10.633232] #1: (____ptrval____) (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: rcu_read_lock+0x0/0x70 [ 10.640954] #2: (____ptrval____) (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: rcu_read_lock+0x0/0x70 These "rcu_read_lock+0x0/0x70" strings are not providing any useful information. This commit therefore forces inlining of the rcu_read_lock() function so that rcu_read_lock()'s caller is instead shown. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2019
[ Upstream commit 3f167e1 ] ipv4_pdp_add() is called in RCU read-side critical section. So GFP_KERNEL should not be used in the function. This patch make ipv4_pdp_add() to use GFP_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL. Test commands: gtp-link add gtp1 & gtp-tunnel add gtp1 v1 100 200 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 Splat looks like: [ 130.618881] ============================= [ 130.626382] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 130.626994] 5.2.0-rc6+ #50 Not tainted [ 130.627622] ----------------------------- [ 130.628223] ./include/linux/rcupdate.h:266 Illegal context switch in RCU read-side critical section! [ 130.629684] [ 130.629684] other info that might help us debug this: [ 130.629684] [ 130.631022] [ 130.631022] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 130.632136] 4 locks held by gtp-tunnel/1025: [ 130.632925] #0: 000000002b93c8b7 (cb_lock){++++}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 [ 130.634159] #1: 00000000f17bc999 (genl_mutex){+.+.}, at: genl_rcv_msg+0xfb/0x130 [ 130.635487] #2: 00000000c644ed8e (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: gtp_genl_new_pdp+0x18c/0x1150 [gtp] [ 130.636936] #3: 0000000007a1cde7 (rcu_read_lock){....}, at: gtp_genl_new_pdp+0x187/0x1150 [gtp] [ 130.638348] [ 130.638348] stack backtrace: [ 130.639062] CPU: 1 PID: 1025 Comm: gtp-tunnel Not tainted 5.2.0-rc6+ #50 [ 130.641318] Call Trace: [ 130.641707] dump_stack+0x7c/0xbb [ 130.642252] ___might_sleep+0x2c0/0x3b0 [ 130.642862] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1cd/0x2b0 [ 130.643591] gtp_genl_new_pdp+0x6c5/0x1150 [gtp] [ 130.644371] genl_family_rcv_msg+0x63a/0x1030 [ 130.645074] ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1090/0x1090 [ 130.645845] ? genl_unregister_family+0x630/0x630 [ 130.646592] ? debug_show_all_locks+0x2d0/0x2d0 [ 130.647293] ? check_flags.part.40+0x440/0x440 [ 130.648099] genl_rcv_msg+0xa3/0x130 [ ... ] Fixes: 459aa66 ("gtp: add initial driver for datapath of GPRS Tunneling Protocol (GTP-U)") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2019
[ Upstream commit 181fa43 ] According to the PCI Local Bus specification Revision 3.0, section 6.8.1.3 (Message Control for MSI), endpoints that are Multiple Message Capable as defined by bits [3:1] in the Message Control for MSI can request a number of vectors that is power of two aligned. As specified in section 6.8.1.6 "Message data for MSI", the Multiple Message Enable field (bits [6:4] of the Message Control register) defines the number of low order message data bits the function is permitted to modify to generate its system software allocated vectors. The MSI controller in the Xilinx NWL PCIe controller supports a number of MSI vectors specified through a bitmap and the hwirq number for an MSI, that is the value written in the MSI data TLP is determined by the bitmap allocation. For instance, in a situation where two endpoints sitting on the PCI bus request the following MSI configuration, with the current PCI Xilinx bitmap allocation code (that does not align MSI vector allocation on a power of two boundary): Endpoint #1: Requesting 1 MSI vector - allocated bitmap bits 0 Endpoint #2: Requesting 2 MSI vectors - allocated bitmap bits [1,2] The bitmap value(s) corresponds to the hwirq number that is programmed into the Message Data for MSI field in the endpoint MSI capability and is detected by the root complex to fire the corresponding MSI irqs. The value written in Message Data for MSI field corresponds to the first bit allocated in the bitmap for Multi MSI vectors. The current Xilinx NWL MSI allocation code allows a bitmap allocation that is not a power of two boundaries, so endpoint #2, is allowed to toggle Message Data bit[0] to differentiate between its two vectors (meaning that the MSI data will be respectively 0x0 and 0x1 for the two vectors allocated to endpoint #2). This clearly aliases with the Endpoint #1 vector allocation, resulting in a broken Multi MSI implementation. Update the code to allocate MSI bitmap ranges with a power of two alignment, fixing the bug. Fixes: ab597d3 ("PCI: xilinx-nwl: Add support for Xilinx NWL PCIe Host Controller") Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com> [lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com: updated commit log] Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2019
[ Upstream commit 80e5302 ] An impending change to enable HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT on powerpc leads to warnings such as the following: # modprobe kprobe_example ftrace-powerpc: Not expected bl: opcode is 3c4c0001 WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 227 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2001 ftrace_bug+0x90/0x318 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 227 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 5.2.0-rc6-00678-g1c329100b942 #2 NIP: c000000000264318 LR: c00000000025d694 CTR: c000000000f5cd30 REGS: c000000001f2b7b0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (5.2.0-rc6-00678-g1c329100b942) MSR: 900000010282b033 <SF,HV,VEC,VSX,EE,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE,TM[E]> CR: 28228222 XER: 00000000 CFAR: c0000000002642fc IRQMASK: 0 <snip> NIP [c000000000264318] ftrace_bug+0x90/0x318 LR [c00000000025d694] ftrace_process_locs+0x4f4/0x5e0 Call Trace: [c000000001f2ba40] [0000000000000004] 0x4 (unreliable) [c000000001f2bad0] [c00000000025d694] ftrace_process_locs+0x4f4/0x5e0 [c000000001f2bb90] [c00000000020ff10] load_module+0x25b0/0x30c0 [c000000001f2bd00] [c000000000210cb0] sys_finit_module+0xc0/0x130 [c000000001f2be20] [c00000000000bda4] system_call+0x5c/0x70 Instruction dump: 419e0018 2f83ffff 419e00bc 2f83ffea 409e00cc 4800001c 0fe00000 3c62ff96 39000001 39400000 386386d0 480000c4 <0fe00000> 3ce20003 39000001 3c62ff96 ---[ end trace 4c438d5cebf78381 ]--- ftrace failed to modify [<c0080000012a0008>] 0xc0080000012a0008 actual: 01:00:4c:3c Initializing ftrace call sites ftrace record flags: 2000000 (0) expected tramp: c00000000006af4c Looking at the relocation records in __mcount_loc shows a few spurious entries: RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [__mcount_loc]: OFFSET TYPE VALUE 0000000000000000 R_PPC64_ADDR64 .text.unlikely+0x0000000000000008 0000000000000008 R_PPC64_ADDR64 .text.unlikely+0x0000000000000014 0000000000000010 R_PPC64_ADDR64 .text.unlikely+0x0000000000000060 0000000000000018 R_PPC64_ADDR64 .text.unlikely+0x00000000000000b4 0000000000000020 R_PPC64_ADDR64 .init.text+0x0000000000000008 0000000000000028 R_PPC64_ADDR64 .init.text+0x0000000000000014 The first entry in each section is incorrect. Looking at the relocation records, the spurious entries correspond to the R_PPC64_ENTRY records: RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.text.unlikely]: OFFSET TYPE VALUE 0000000000000000 R_PPC64_REL64 .TOC.-0x0000000000000008 0000000000000008 R_PPC64_ENTRY *ABS* 0000000000000014 R_PPC64_REL24 _mcount <snip> The problem is that we are not validating the return value from get_mcountsym() in sift_rel_mcount(). With this entry, mcountsym is 0, but Elf_r_sym(relp) also ends up being 0. Fix this by ensuring mcountsym is valid before processing the entry. Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Tested-by: Satheesh Rajendran <sathnaga@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2019
commit 2b5c8f0 upstream. Commit abbbdf1 ("replace kill_bdev() with __invalidate_device()") once did this, but 29eaadc ("nbd: stop using the bdev everywhere") resurrected kill_bdev() and it has been there since then. So buffer_head mappings still get killed on a server disconnection, and we can still hit the BUG_ON on a filesystem on the top of the nbd device. EXT4-fs (nbd0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: (null) block nbd0: Receive control failed (result -32) block nbd0: shutting down sockets print_req_error: I/O error, dev nbd0, sector 66264 flags 3000 EXT4-fs warning (device nbd0): htree_dirblock_to_tree:979: inode #2: lblock 0: comm ls: error -5 reading directory block print_req_error: I/O error, dev nbd0, sector 2264 flags 3000 EXT4-fs error (device nbd0): __ext4_get_inode_loc:4690: inode #2: block 283: comm ls: unable to read itable block EXT4-fs error (device nbd0) in ext4_reserve_inode_write:5894: IO failure ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:3057! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI CPU: 7 PID: 40045 Comm: jbd2/nbd0-8 Not tainted 5.1.0-rc3+ #4 Hardware name: Amazon EC2 m5.12xlarge/, BIOS 1.0 10/16/2017 RIP: 0010:submit_bh_wbc+0x18b/0x190 ... Call Trace: jbd2_write_superblock+0xf1/0x230 [jbd2] ? account_entity_enqueue+0xc5/0xf0 jbd2_journal_update_sb_log_tail+0x94/0xe0 [jbd2] jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x12f/0x1d20 [jbd2] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70 ... ? lock_timer_base+0x67/0x80 kjournald2+0x121/0x360 [jbd2] ? remove_wait_queue+0x60/0x60 kthread+0xf8/0x130 ? commit_timeout+0x10/0x10 [jbd2] ? kthread_bind+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 With __invalidate_device(), I no longer hit the BUG_ON with sync or unmount on the disconnected device. Fixes: 29eaadc ("nbd: stop using the bdev everywhere") Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ratna Manoj Bolla <manoj.br@gmail.com> Cc: nbd@other.debian.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.com> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Munehisa Kamata <kamatam@amazon.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2019
commit d0a255e upstream. A deadlock with this stacktrace was observed. The loop thread does a GFP_KERNEL allocation, it calls into dm-bufio shrinker and the shrinker depends on I/O completion in the dm-bufio subsystem. In order to fix the deadlock (and other similar ones), we set the flag PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO at loop thread entry. PID: 474 TASK: ffff8813e11f4600 CPU: 10 COMMAND: "kswapd0" #0 [ffff8813dedfb938] __schedule at ffffffff8173f405 #1 [ffff8813dedfb990] schedule at ffffffff8173fa27 #2 [ffff8813dedfb9b0] schedule_timeout at ffffffff81742fec #3 [ffff8813dedfba60] io_schedule_timeout at ffffffff8173f186 #4 [ffff8813dedfbaa0] bit_wait_io at ffffffff8174034f #5 [ffff8813dedfbac0] __wait_on_bit at ffffffff8173fec8 #6 [ffff8813dedfbb10] out_of_line_wait_on_bit at ffffffff8173ff81 #7 [ffff8813dedfbb90] __make_buffer_clean at ffffffffa038736f [dm_bufio] #8 [ffff8813dedfbbb0] __try_evict_buffer at ffffffffa0387bb8 [dm_bufio] #9 [ffff8813dedfbbd0] dm_bufio_shrink_scan at ffffffffa0387cc3 [dm_bufio] #10 [ffff8813dedfbc40] shrink_slab at ffffffff811a87ce #11 [ffff8813dedfbd30] shrink_zone at ffffffff811ad778 #12 [ffff8813dedfbdc0] kswapd at ffffffff811ae92f #13 [ffff8813dedfbec0] kthread at ffffffff810a8428 #14 [ffff8813dedfbf50] ret_from_fork at ffffffff81745242 PID: 14127 TASK: ffff881455749c00 CPU: 11 COMMAND: "loop1" #0 [ffff88272f5af228] __schedule at ffffffff8173f405 #1 [ffff88272f5af280] schedule at ffffffff8173fa27 #2 [ffff88272f5af2a0] schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffff8173fd5e #3 [ffff88272f5af2b0] __mutex_lock_slowpath at ffffffff81741fb5 #4 [ffff88272f5af330] mutex_lock at ffffffff81742133 #5 [ffff88272f5af350] dm_bufio_shrink_count at ffffffffa03865f9 [dm_bufio] #6 [ffff88272f5af380] shrink_slab at ffffffff811a86bd #7 [ffff88272f5af470] shrink_zone at ffffffff811ad778 #8 [ffff88272f5af500] do_try_to_free_pages at ffffffff811adb34 #9 [ffff88272f5af590] try_to_free_pages at ffffffff811adef8 #10 [ffff88272f5af610] __alloc_pages_nodemask at ffffffff811a09c3 #11 [ffff88272f5af710] alloc_pages_current at ffffffff811e8b71 #12 [ffff88272f5af760] new_slab at ffffffff811f4523 #13 [ffff88272f5af7b0] __slab_alloc at ffffffff8173a1b5 #14 [ffff88272f5af880] kmem_cache_alloc at ffffffff811f484b #15 [ffff88272f5af8d0] do_blockdev_direct_IO at ffffffff812535b3 #16 [ffff88272f5afb00] __blockdev_direct_IO at ffffffff81255dc3 #17 [ffff88272f5afb30] xfs_vm_direct_IO at ffffffffa01fe3fc [xfs] #18 [ffff88272f5afb90] generic_file_read_iter at ffffffff81198994 #19 [ffff88272f5afc50] __dta_xfs_file_read_iter_2398 at ffffffffa020c970 [xfs] #20 [ffff88272f5afcc0] lo_rw_aio at ffffffffa0377042 [loop] #21 [ffff88272f5afd70] loop_queue_work at ffffffffa0377c3b [loop] #22 [ffff88272f5afe60] kthread_worker_fn at ffffffff810a8a0c #23 [ffff88272f5afec0] kthread at ffffffff810a8428 #24 [ffff88272f5aff50] ret_from_fork at ffffffff81745242 Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 15, 2019
commit cf3591e upstream. Revert the commit bd293d0. The proper fix has been made available with commit d0a255e ("loop: set PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO for the worker thread"). Note that the fix offered by commit bd293d0 doesn't really prevent the deadlock from occuring - if we look at the stacktrace reported by Junxiao Bi, we see that it hangs in bit_wait_io and not on the mutex - i.e. it has already successfully taken the mutex. Changing the mutex from mutex_lock to mutex_trylock won't help with deadlocks that happen afterwards. PID: 474 TASK: ffff8813e11f4600 CPU: 10 COMMAND: "kswapd0" #0 [ffff8813dedfb938] __schedule at ffffffff8173f405 #1 [ffff8813dedfb990] schedule at ffffffff8173fa27 #2 [ffff8813dedfb9b0] schedule_timeout at ffffffff81742fec #3 [ffff8813dedfba60] io_schedule_timeout at ffffffff8173f186 #4 [ffff8813dedfbaa0] bit_wait_io at ffffffff8174034f #5 [ffff8813dedfbac0] __wait_on_bit at ffffffff8173fec8 #6 [ffff8813dedfbb10] out_of_line_wait_on_bit at ffffffff8173ff81 #7 [ffff8813dedfbb90] __make_buffer_clean at ffffffffa038736f [dm_bufio] #8 [ffff8813dedfbbb0] __try_evict_buffer at ffffffffa0387bb8 [dm_bufio] #9 [ffff8813dedfbbd0] dm_bufio_shrink_scan at ffffffffa0387cc3 [dm_bufio] #10 [ffff8813dedfbc40] shrink_slab at ffffffff811a87ce #11 [ffff8813dedfbd30] shrink_zone at ffffffff811ad778 #12 [ffff8813dedfbdc0] kswapd at ffffffff811ae92f #13 [ffff8813dedfbec0] kthread at ffffffff810a8428 #14 [ffff8813dedfbf50] ret_from_fork at ffffffff81745242 Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: bd293d0 ("dm bufio: fix deadlock with loop device") Depends-on: d0a255e ("loop: set PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO for the worker thread") Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2019
[ Upstream commit 86968ef ] Calling ceph_buffer_put() in __ceph_setxattr() may end up freeing the i_xattrs.prealloc_blob buffer while holding the i_ceph_lock. This can be fixed by postponing the call until later, when the lock is released. The following backtrace was triggered by fstests generic/117. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/vmalloc.c:2283 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 650, name: fsstress 3 locks held by fsstress/650: #0: 00000000870a0fe8 (sb_writers#8){.+.+}, at: mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 #1: 00000000ba0c4c74 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6){++++}, at: vfs_setxattr+0x55/0xa0 #2: 000000008dfbb3f2 (&(&ci->i_ceph_lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: __ceph_setxattr+0x297/0x810 CPU: 1 PID: 650 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 5.2.0+ #437 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x67/0x90 ___might_sleep.cold+0x9f/0xb1 vfree+0x4b/0x60 ceph_buffer_release+0x1b/0x60 __ceph_setxattr+0x2b4/0x810 __vfs_setxattr+0x66/0x80 __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x59/0xf0 vfs_setxattr+0x81/0xa0 setxattr+0x115/0x230 ? filename_lookup+0xc9/0x140 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x74/0x80 ? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x2e/0x60 ? __sb_start_write+0x142/0x1a0 ? mnt_want_write+0x20/0x50 path_setxattr+0xba/0xd0 __x64_sys_lsetxattr+0x24/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe RIP: 0033:0x7ff23514359a Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2019
…s_blob() [ Upstream commit 12fe3dd ] Calling ceph_buffer_put() in __ceph_build_xattrs_blob() may result in freeing the i_xattrs.blob buffer while holding the i_ceph_lock. This can be fixed by having this function returning the old blob buffer and have the callers of this function freeing it when the lock is released. The following backtrace was triggered by fstests generic/117. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/vmalloc.c:2283 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 649, name: fsstress 4 locks held by fsstress/649: #0: 00000000a7478e7e (&type->s_umount_key#19){++++}, at: iterate_supers+0x77/0xf0 #1: 00000000f8de1423 (&(&ci->i_ceph_lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: ceph_check_caps+0x7b/0xc60 #2: 00000000562f2b27 (&s->s_mutex){+.+.}, at: ceph_check_caps+0x3bd/0xc60 #3: 00000000f83ce16a (&mdsc->snap_rwsem){++++}, at: ceph_check_caps+0x3ed/0xc60 CPU: 1 PID: 649 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 5.2.0+ #439 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x67/0x90 ___might_sleep.cold+0x9f/0xb1 vfree+0x4b/0x60 ceph_buffer_release+0x1b/0x60 __ceph_build_xattrs_blob+0x12b/0x170 __send_cap+0x302/0x540 ? __lock_acquire+0x23c/0x1e40 ? __mark_caps_flushing+0x15c/0x280 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x24/0x30 ceph_check_caps+0x5f0/0xc60 ceph_flush_dirty_caps+0x7c/0x150 ? __ia32_sys_fdatasync+0x20/0x20 ceph_sync_fs+0x5a/0x130 iterate_supers+0x8f/0xf0 ksys_sync+0x4f/0xb0 __ia32_sys_sync+0xa/0x10 do_syscall_64+0x50/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe RIP: 0033:0x7fc6409ab617 Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2019
[ Upstream commit af8a85a ] Calling ceph_buffer_put() in fill_inode() may result in freeing the i_xattrs.blob buffer while holding the i_ceph_lock. This can be fixed by postponing the call until later, when the lock is released. The following backtrace was triggered by fstests generic/070. BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/vmalloc.c:2283 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 3852, name: kworker/0:4 6 locks held by kworker/0:4/3852: #0: 000000004270f6bb ((wq_completion)ceph-msgr){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1b8/0x5f0 #1: 00000000eb420803 ((work_completion)(&(&con->work)->work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x1b8/0x5f0 #2: 00000000be1c53a4 (&s->s_mutex){+.+.}, at: dispatch+0x288/0x1476 #3: 00000000559cb958 (&mdsc->snap_rwsem){++++}, at: dispatch+0x2eb/0x1476 #4: 000000000d5ebbae (&req->r_fill_mutex){+.+.}, at: dispatch+0x2fc/0x1476 #5: 00000000a83d0514 (&(&ci->i_ceph_lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: fill_inode.isra.0+0xf8/0xf70 CPU: 0 PID: 3852 Comm: kworker/0:4 Not tainted 5.2.0+ #441 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: ceph-msgr ceph_con_workfn Call Trace: dump_stack+0x67/0x90 ___might_sleep.cold+0x9f/0xb1 vfree+0x4b/0x60 ceph_buffer_release+0x1b/0x60 fill_inode.isra.0+0xa9b/0xf70 ceph_fill_trace+0x13b/0xc70 ? dispatch+0x2eb/0x1476 dispatch+0x320/0x1476 ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x4d/0x2a0 ceph_con_workfn+0xc97/0x2ec0 ? process_one_work+0x1b8/0x5f0 process_one_work+0x244/0x5f0 worker_thread+0x4d/0x3e0 kthread+0x105/0x140 ? process_one_work+0x5f0/0x5f0 ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 29, 2019
[ Upstream commit fe163e5 ] syzbot reported: BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in capi_write+0x791/0xa90 drivers/isdn/capi/capi.c:700 CPU: 0 PID: 10025 Comm: syz-executor379 Not tainted 4.20.0-rc7+ #2 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x173/0x1d0 lib/dump_stack.c:113 kmsan_report+0x12e/0x2a0 mm/kmsan/kmsan.c:613 __msan_warning+0x82/0xf0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_instr.c:313 capi_write+0x791/0xa90 drivers/isdn/capi/capi.c:700 do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:703 [inline] do_iter_write+0x83e/0xd80 fs/read_write.c:961 vfs_writev fs/read_write.c:1004 [inline] do_writev+0x397/0x840 fs/read_write.c:1039 __do_sys_writev fs/read_write.c:1112 [inline] __se_sys_writev+0x9b/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:1109 __x64_sys_writev+0x4a/0x70 fs/read_write.c:1109 do_syscall_64+0xbc/0xf0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:291 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xe7 [...] The problem is that capi_write() is reading past the end of the message. Fix it by checking the message's length in the needed places. Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+0849c524d9c634f5ae66@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 1, 2019
[ Upstream commit fe163e5 ] syzbot reported: BUG: KMSAN: uninit-value in capi_write+0x791/0xa90 drivers/isdn/capi/capi.c:700 CPU: 0 PID: 10025 Comm: syz-executor379 Not tainted 4.20.0-rc7+ #2 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0x173/0x1d0 lib/dump_stack.c:113 kmsan_report+0x12e/0x2a0 mm/kmsan/kmsan.c:613 __msan_warning+0x82/0xf0 mm/kmsan/kmsan_instr.c:313 capi_write+0x791/0xa90 drivers/isdn/capi/capi.c:700 do_loop_readv_writev fs/read_write.c:703 [inline] do_iter_write+0x83e/0xd80 fs/read_write.c:961 vfs_writev fs/read_write.c:1004 [inline] do_writev+0x397/0x840 fs/read_write.c:1039 __do_sys_writev fs/read_write.c:1112 [inline] __se_sys_writev+0x9b/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:1109 __x64_sys_writev+0x4a/0x70 fs/read_write.c:1109 do_syscall_64+0xbc/0xf0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:291 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xe7 [...] The problem is that capi_write() is reading past the end of the message. Fix it by checking the message's length in the needed places. Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+0849c524d9c634f5ae66@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 17, 2019
[ Upstream commit 79c92ca ] When receiving a deauthentication/disassociation frame from a TDLS peer, a station should not disconnect the current AP, but only disable the current TDLS link if it's enabled. Without this change, a TDLS issue can be reproduced by following the steps as below: 1. STA-1 and STA-2 are connected to AP, bidirection traffic is running between STA-1 and STA-2. 2. Set up TDLS link between STA-1 and STA-2, stay for a while, then teardown TDLS link. 3. Repeat step #2 and monitor the connection between STA and AP. During the test, one STA may send a deauthentication/disassociation frame to another, after TDLS teardown, with reason code 6/7, which means: Class 2/3 frame received from nonassociated STA. On receive this frame, the receiver STA will disconnect the current AP and then reconnect. It's not a expected behavior, purpose of this frame should be disabling the TDLS link, not the link with AP. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Yu Wang <yyuwang@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 17, 2019
commit f8659d6 upstream. Define the working variables to be unsigned long to be compatible with for_each_set_bit and change types as needed. While we are at it remove unused variables from a couple of functions. This was found because of the following KASAN warning: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in find_first_bit+0x19/0x70 Read of size 8 at addr ffff888362d778d0 by task kworker/u308:2/1889 CPU: 21 PID: 1889 Comm: kworker/u308:2 Tainted: G W 5.3.0-rc2-mm1+ #2 Hardware name: Intel Corporation W2600CR/W2600CR, BIOS SE5C600.86B.02.04.0003.102320141138 10/23/2014 Workqueue: ib-comp-unb-wq ib_cq_poll_work [ib_core] Call Trace: dump_stack+0x9a/0xf0 ? find_first_bit+0x19/0x70 print_address_description+0x6c/0x332 ? find_first_bit+0x19/0x70 ? find_first_bit+0x19/0x70 __kasan_report.cold.6+0x1a/0x3b ? find_first_bit+0x19/0x70 kasan_report+0xe/0x12 find_first_bit+0x19/0x70 pma_get_opa_portstatus+0x5cc/0xa80 [hfi1] ? ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 ? pma_get_opa_port_ectrs+0x200/0x200 [hfi1] ? stack_trace_consume_entry+0x80/0x80 hfi1_process_mad+0x39b/0x26c0 [hfi1] ? __lock_acquire+0x65e/0x21b0 ? clear_linkup_counters+0xb0/0xb0 [hfi1] ? check_chain_key+0x1d7/0x2e0 ? lock_downgrade+0x3a0/0x3a0 ? match_held_lock+0x2e/0x250 ib_mad_recv_done+0x698/0x15e0 [ib_core] ? clear_linkup_counters+0xb0/0xb0 [hfi1] ? ib_mad_send_done+0xc80/0xc80 [ib_core] ? mark_held_locks+0x79/0xa0 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x44/0x60 ? rvt_poll_cq+0x1e1/0x340 [rdmavt] __ib_process_cq+0x97/0x100 [ib_core] ib_cq_poll_work+0x31/0xb0 [ib_core] process_one_work+0x4ee/0xa00 ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x110/0x110 ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x113/0x1d0 worker_thread+0x57/0x5a0 ? process_one_work+0xa00/0xa00 kthread+0x1bb/0x1e0 ? kthread_create_on_node+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 The buggy address belongs to the page: page:ffffea000d8b5dc0 refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 flags: 0x17ffffc0000000() raw: 0017ffffc0000000 0000000000000000 ffffea000d8b5dc8 0000000000000000 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected addr ffff888362d778d0 is located in stack of task kworker/u308:2/1889 at offset 32 in frame: pma_get_opa_portstatus+0x0/0xa80 [hfi1] this frame has 1 object: [32, 36) 'vl_select_mask' Memory state around the buggy address: ffff888362d77780: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff888362d77800: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 >ffff888362d77880: 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 04 f2 f2 f2 00 00 ^ ffff888362d77900: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ffff888362d77980: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 04 f2 f2 f2 ================================================================== Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: 7724105 ("IB/hfi1: add driver files") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190911113053.126040.47327.stgit@awfm-01.aw.intel.com Reviewed-by: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kaike Wan <kaike.wan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 17, 2019
commit ab57588 upstream. ccw console is created early in start_kernel and used before css is initialized or ccw console subchannel is registered. Until then console subchannel does not have a parent. For that reason assume subchannels with no parent are not pseudo subchannels. This fixes the following kasan finding: BUG: KASAN: global-out-of-bounds in sch_is_pseudo_sch+0x8e/0x98 Read of size 8 at addr 00000000000005e8 by task swapper/0/0 CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc8-07370-g6ac43dd12538 #2 Hardware name: IBM 2964 NC9 702 (z/VM 6.4.0) Call Trace: ([<000000000012cd76>] show_stack+0x14e/0x1e0) [<0000000001f7fb44>] dump_stack+0x1a4/0x1f8 [<00000000007d7afc>] print_address_description+0x64/0x3c8 [<00000000007d75f6>] __kasan_report+0x14e/0x180 [<00000000018a2986>] sch_is_pseudo_sch+0x8e/0x98 [<000000000189b950>] cio_enable_subchannel+0x1d0/0x510 [<00000000018cac7c>] ccw_device_recognition+0x12c/0x188 [<0000000002ceb1a8>] ccw_device_enable_console+0x138/0x340 [<0000000002cf1cbe>] con3215_init+0x25e/0x300 [<0000000002c8770a>] console_init+0x68a/0x9b8 [<0000000002c6a3d6>] start_kernel+0x4fe/0x728 [<0000000000100070>] startup_continue+0x70/0xd0 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 17, 2019
[ Upstream commit 0216234 ] We release wrong pointer on error path in cpu_cache_level__read function, leading to segfault: (gdb) r record ls Starting program: /root/perf/tools/perf/perf record ls ... [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] double free or corruption (out) Thread 1 "perf" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0x00007ffff7463798 in raise () from /lib64/power9/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x00007ffff7463798 in raise () from /lib64/power9/libc.so.6 #1 0x00007ffff7443bac in abort () from /lib64/power9/libc.so.6 #2 0x00007ffff74af8bc in __libc_message () from /lib64/power9/libc.so.6 #3 0x00007ffff74b92b8 in malloc_printerr () from /lib64/power9/libc.so.6 #4 0x00007ffff74bb874 in _int_free () from /lib64/power9/libc.so.6 #5 0x0000000010271260 in __zfree (ptr=0x7fffffffa0b0) at ../../lib/zalloc.. #6 0x0000000010139340 in cpu_cache_level__read (cache=0x7fffffffa090, cac.. #7 0x0000000010143c90 in build_caches (cntp=0x7fffffffa118, size=<optimiz.. ... Releasing the proper pointer. Fixes: 720e98b ("perf tools: Add perf data cache feature") Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org: # v4.6+ Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190912105235.10689-1-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 17, 2019
[ Upstream commit 443f2d5 ] Observe a segmentation fault when 'perf stat' is asked to repeat forever with the interval option. Without fix: # perf stat -r 0 -I 5000 -e cycles -a sleep 10 # time counts unit events 5.000211692 3,13,89,82,34,157 cycles 10.000380119 1,53,98,52,22,294 cycles 10.040467280 17,16,79,265 cycles Segmentation fault This problem was only observed when we use forever option aka -r 0 and works with limited repeats. Calling print_counter with ts being set to NULL, is not a correct option when interval is set. Hence avoid print_counter(NULL,..) if interval is set. With fix: # perf stat -r 0 -I 5000 -e cycles -a sleep 10 # time counts unit events 5.019866622 3,15,14,43,08,697 cycles 10.039865756 3,15,16,31,95,261 cycles 10.059950628 1,26,05,47,158 cycles 5.009902655 3,14,52,62,33,932 cycles 10.019880228 3,14,52,22,89,154 cycles 10.030543876 66,90,18,333 cycles 5.009848281 3,14,51,98,25,437 cycles 10.029854402 3,15,14,93,04,918 cycles 5.009834177 3,14,51,95,92,316 cycles Committer notes: Did the 'git bisect' to find the cset introducing the problem to add the Fixes tag below, and at that time the problem reproduced as: (gdb) run stat -r0 -I500 sleep 1 <SNIP> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. print_interval (prefix=prefix@entry=0x7fffffffc8d0 "", ts=ts@entry=0x0) at builtin-stat.c:866 866 sprintf(prefix, "%6lu.%09lu%s", ts->tv_sec, ts->tv_nsec, csv_sep); (gdb) bt #0 print_interval (prefix=prefix@entry=0x7fffffffc8d0 "", ts=ts@entry=0x0) at builtin-stat.c:866 #1 0x000000000041860a in print_counters (ts=ts@entry=0x0, argc=argc@entry=2, argv=argv@entry=0x7fffffffd640) at builtin-stat.c:938 #2 0x0000000000419a7f in cmd_stat (argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffd640, prefix=<optimized out>) at builtin-stat.c:1411 #3 0x000000000045c65a in run_builtin (p=p@entry=0x6291b8 <commands+216>, argc=argc@entry=5, argv=argv@entry=0x7fffffffd640) at perf.c:370 #4 0x000000000045c893 in handle_internal_command (argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffd640) at perf.c:429 #5 0x000000000045c8f1 in run_argv (argcp=argcp@entry=0x7fffffffd4ac, argv=argv@entry=0x7fffffffd4a0) at perf.c:473 #6 0x000000000045cac9 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at perf.c:588 (gdb) Mostly the same as just before this patch: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00000000005874a7 in print_interval (config=0xa1f2a0 <stat_config>, evlist=0xbc9b90, prefix=0x7fffffffd1c0 "`", ts=0x0) at util/stat-display.c:964 964 sprintf(prefix, "%6lu.%09lu%s", ts->tv_sec, ts->tv_nsec, config->csv_sep); (gdb) bt #0 0x00000000005874a7 in print_interval (config=0xa1f2a0 <stat_config>, evlist=0xbc9b90, prefix=0x7fffffffd1c0 "`", ts=0x0) at util/stat-display.c:964 #1 0x0000000000588047 in perf_evlist__print_counters (evlist=0xbc9b90, config=0xa1f2a0 <stat_config>, _target=0xa1f0c0 <target>, ts=0x0, argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffd670) at util/stat-display.c:1172 #2 0x000000000045390f in print_counters (ts=0x0, argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffd670) at builtin-stat.c:656 #3 0x0000000000456bb5 in cmd_stat (argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffd670) at builtin-stat.c:1960 #4 0x00000000004dd2e0 in run_builtin (p=0xa30e00 <commands+288>, argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffd670) at perf.c:310 #5 0x00000000004dd54d in handle_internal_command (argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffd670) at perf.c:362 #6 0x00000000004dd694 in run_argv (argcp=0x7fffffffd4cc, argv=0x7fffffffd4c0) at perf.c:406 #7 0x00000000004dda11 in main (argc=5, argv=0x7fffffffd670) at perf.c:531 (gdb) Fixes: d4f63a4 ("perf stat: Introduce print_counters function") Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Tested-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+ Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190904094738.9558-3-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 17, 2019
[ Upstream commit 2190168 ] On excessive bit errors for the FCP channel ingress fibre path, the channel notifies us. Previously, we only emitted a kernel message and a trace record. Since performance can become suboptimal with I/O timeouts due to bit errors, we now stop using an FCP device by default on channel notification so multipath on top can timely failover to other paths. A new module parameter zfcp.ber_stop can be used to get zfcp old behavior. User explanation of new kernel message: * Description: * The FCP channel reported that its bit error threshold has been exceeded. * These errors might result from a problem with the physical components * of the local fibre link into the FCP channel. * The problem might be damage or malfunction of the cable or * cable connection between the FCP channel and * the adjacent fabric switch port or the point-to-point peer. * Find details about the errors in the HBA trace for the FCP device. * The zfcp device driver closed down the FCP device * to limit the performance impact from possible I/O command timeouts. * User action: * Check for problems on the local fibre link, ensure that fibre optics are * clean and functional, and all cables are properly plugged. * After the repair action, you can manually recover the FCP device by * writing "0" into its "failed" sysfs attribute. * If recovery through sysfs is not possible, set the CHPID of the device * offline and back online on the service element. Fixes: 1da177e ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #2.6.30+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191001104949.42810-1-maier@linux.ibm.com Reviewed-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 17, 2019
commit e4f8e51 upstream. A long time ago we fixed a similar deadlock in show_slab_objects() [1]. However, it is apparently due to the commits like 01fb58b ("slab: remove synchronous synchronize_sched() from memcg cache deactivation path") and 03afc0e ("slab: get_online_mems for kmem_cache_{create,destroy,shrink}"), this kind of deadlock is back by just reading files in /sys/kernel/slab which will generate a lockdep splat below. Since the "mem_hotplug_lock" here is only to obtain a stable online node mask while racing with NUMA node hotplug, in the worst case, the results may me miscalculated while doing NUMA node hotplug, but they shall be corrected by later reads of the same files. WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected ------------------------------------------------------ cat/5224 is trying to acquire lock: ffff900012ac3120 (mem_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at: show_slab_objects+0x94/0x3a8 but task is already holding lock: b8ff009693eee398 (kn->count#45){++++}, at: kernfs_seq_start+0x44/0xf0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (kn->count#45){++++}: lock_acquire+0x31c/0x360 __kernfs_remove+0x290/0x490 kernfs_remove+0x30/0x44 sysfs_remove_dir+0x70/0x88 kobject_del+0x50/0xb0 sysfs_slab_unlink+0x2c/0x38 shutdown_cache+0xa0/0xf0 kmemcg_cache_shutdown_fn+0x1c/0x34 kmemcg_workfn+0x44/0x64 process_one_work+0x4f4/0x950 worker_thread+0x390/0x4bc kthread+0x1cc/0x1e8 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 -> #1 (slab_mutex){+.+.}: lock_acquire+0x31c/0x360 __mutex_lock_common+0x16c/0xf78 mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x50 memcg_create_kmem_cache+0x38/0x16c memcg_kmem_cache_create_func+0x3c/0x70 process_one_work+0x4f4/0x950 worker_thread+0x390/0x4bc kthread+0x1cc/0x1e8 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 -> #0 (mem_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: validate_chain+0xd10/0x2bcc __lock_acquire+0x7f4/0xb8c lock_acquire+0x31c/0x360 get_online_mems+0x54/0x150 show_slab_objects+0x94/0x3a8 total_objects_show+0x28/0x34 slab_attr_show+0x38/0x54 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x198/0x2d4 kernfs_seq_show+0xa4/0xcc seq_read+0x30c/0x8a8 kernfs_fop_read+0xa8/0x314 __vfs_read+0x88/0x20c vfs_read+0xd8/0x10c ksys_read+0xb0/0x120 __arm64_sys_read+0x54/0x88 el0_svc_handler+0x170/0x240 el0_svc+0x8/0xc other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: mem_hotplug_lock.rw_sem --> slab_mutex --> kn->count#45 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(kn->count#45); lock(slab_mutex); lock(kn->count#45); lock(mem_hotplug_lock.rw_sem); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by cat/5224: #0: 9eff00095b14b2a0 (&p->lock){+.+.}, at: seq_read+0x4c/0x8a8 #1: 0eff008997041480 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_seq_start+0x34/0xf0 #2: b8ff009693eee398 (kn->count#45){++++}, at: kernfs_seq_start+0x44/0xf0 stack backtrace: Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x0/0x248 show_stack+0x20/0x2c dump_stack+0xd0/0x140 print_circular_bug+0x368/0x380 check_noncircular+0x248/0x250 validate_chain+0xd10/0x2bcc __lock_acquire+0x7f4/0xb8c lock_acquire+0x31c/0x360 get_online_mems+0x54/0x150 show_slab_objects+0x94/0x3a8 total_objects_show+0x28/0x34 slab_attr_show+0x38/0x54 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x198/0x2d4 kernfs_seq_show+0xa4/0xcc seq_read+0x30c/0x8a8 kernfs_fop_read+0xa8/0x314 __vfs_read+0x88/0x20c vfs_read+0xd8/0x10c ksys_read+0xb0/0x120 __arm64_sys_read+0x54/0x88 el0_svc_handler+0x170/0x240 el0_svc+0x8/0xc I think it is important to mention that this doesn't expose the show_slab_objects to use-after-free. There is only a single path that might really race here and that is the slab hotplug notifier callback __kmem_cache_shrink (via slab_mem_going_offline_callback) but that path doesn't really destroy kmem_cache_node data structures. [1] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1101.0/02850.html [akpm@linux-foundation.org: add comment explaining why we don't need mem_hotplug_lock] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1570192309-10132-1-git-send-email-cai@lca.pw Fixes: 01fb58b ("slab: remove synchronous synchronize_sched() from memcg cache deactivation path") Fixes: 03afc0e ("slab: get_online_mems for kmem_cache_{create,destroy,shrink}") Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
[ Upstream commit a866759 ] This reverts commit 64e62bd. This commit ends up causing some lockdep splats due to trying to grab the payload lock while holding the mgr's lock: [ 54.010099] [ 54.011765] ====================================================== [ 54.018670] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 54.025577] 5.5.0-rc6-02274-g77381c23ee63 #47 Not tainted [ 54.031610] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 54.038516] kworker/1:6/1040 is trying to acquire lock: [ 54.044354] ffff888272af3228 (&mgr->payload_lock){+.+.}, at: drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.054957] [ 54.054957] but task is already holding lock: [ 54.061473] ffff888272af3060 (&mgr->lock){+.+.}, at: drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x3c/0x2e4 [ 54.071193] [ 54.071193] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 54.071193] [ 54.080334] [ 54.080334] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 54.088697] [ 54.088697] -> #1 (&mgr->lock){+.+.}: [ 54.094440] __mutex_lock+0xc3/0x498 [ 54.099015] drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated+0x25/0x80 [ 54.106018] drm_dp_update_payload_part1+0xa2/0x2e2 [ 54.112051] intel_mst_pre_enable_dp+0x144/0x18f [ 54.117791] intel_encoders_pre_enable+0x63/0x70 [ 54.123532] hsw_crtc_enable+0xa1/0x722 [ 54.128396] intel_update_crtc+0x50/0x194 [ 54.133455] skl_commit_modeset_enables+0x40c/0x540 [ 54.139485] intel_atomic_commit_tail+0x5f7/0x130d [ 54.145418] intel_atomic_commit+0x2c8/0x2d8 [ 54.150770] drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x5a/0x70 [ 54.156801] drm_mode_setcrtc+0x2ab/0x833 [ 54.161862] drm_ioctl+0x2e5/0x424 [ 54.166242] vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x2f [ 54.170426] do_vfs_ioctl+0x5fb/0x61e [ 54.175096] ksys_ioctl+0x55/0x75 [ 54.179377] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x1e [ 54.184146] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x6d [ 54.188721] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 54.194946] [ 54.194946] -> #0 (&mgr->payload_lock){+.+.}: [ 54.201463] [ 54.201463] other info that might help us debug this: [ 54.201463] [ 54.210410] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 54.210410] [ 54.217025] CPU0 CPU1 [ 54.222082] ---- ---- [ 54.227138] lock(&mgr->lock); [ 54.230643] lock(&mgr->payload_lock); [ 54.237742] lock(&mgr->lock); [ 54.244062] lock(&mgr->payload_lock); [ 54.248346] [ 54.248346] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 54.248346] [ 54.254959] 7 locks held by kworker/1:6/1040: [ 54.259822] #0: ffff888275c4f528 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: worker_thread+0x455/0x6e2 [ 54.269451] #1: ffffc9000119beb0 ((work_completion)(&(&dev_priv->hotplug.hotplug_work)->work)){+.+.}, at: worker_thread+0x455/0x6e2 [ 54.282768] #2: ffff888272a403f0 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}, at: i915_hotplug_work_func+0x4b/0x2be [ 54.293368] #3: ffffffff824fc6c0 (drm_connector_list_iter){.+.+}, at: i915_hotplug_work_func+0x17e/0x2be [ 54.304061] #4: ffffc9000119bc58 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}, at: drm_helper_probe_detect_ctx+0x40/0xfd [ 54.314855] #5: ffff888272a40470 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}, at: drm_modeset_lock+0x74/0xe2 [ 54.324385] #6: ffff888272af3060 (&mgr->lock){+.+.}, at: drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x3c/0x2e4 [ 54.334597] [ 54.334597] stack backtrace: [ 54.339464] CPU: 1 PID: 1040 Comm: kworker/1:6 Not tainted 5.5.0-rc6-02274-g77381c23ee63 #47 [ 54.348893] Hardware name: Google Fizz/Fizz, BIOS Google_Fizz.10139.39.0 01/04/2018 [ 54.357451] Workqueue: events i915_hotplug_work_func [ 54.362995] Call Trace: [ 54.365724] dump_stack+0x71/0x9c [ 54.369427] check_noncircular+0x91/0xbc [ 54.373809] ? __lock_acquire+0xc9e/0xf66 [ 54.378286] ? __lock_acquire+0xc9e/0xf66 [ 54.382763] ? lock_acquire+0x175/0x1ac [ 54.387048] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.393177] ? __mutex_lock+0xc3/0x498 [ 54.397362] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.403492] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.409620] ? drm_dp_dpcd_access+0xd9/0x101 [ 54.414390] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.420517] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.426645] ? intel_digital_port_connected+0x34d/0x35c [ 54.432482] ? intel_dp_detect+0x227/0x44e [ 54.437056] ? ww_mutex_lock+0x49/0x9a [ 54.441242] ? drm_helper_probe_detect_ctx+0x75/0xfd [ 54.446789] ? intel_encoder_hotplug+0x4b/0x97 [ 54.451752] ? intel_ddi_hotplug+0x61/0x2e0 [ 54.456423] ? mark_held_locks+0x53/0x68 [ 54.460803] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3a/0x51 [ 54.466347] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x187/0x1a4 [ 54.471310] ? drm_connector_list_iter_next+0x89/0x9a [ 54.476953] ? i915_hotplug_work_func+0x206/0x2be [ 54.482208] ? worker_thread+0x4d5/0x6e2 [ 54.486587] ? worker_thread+0x455/0x6e2 [ 54.490966] ? queue_work_on+0x64/0x64 [ 54.495151] ? kthread+0x1e9/0x1f1 [ 54.498946] ? queue_work_on+0x64/0x64 [ 54.503130] ? kthread_unpark+0x5e/0x5e [ 54.507413] ? ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 The proper fix for this is probably cleanup the VCPI allocations when we're enabling the topology, or on the first payload allocation. For now though, let's just revert. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Fixes: 64e62bd ("drm/dp_mst: Remove VCPI while disabling topology mgr") Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run> Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117205149.97262-1-lyude@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
[ Upstream commit 696ac2e ] Similar to commit 0266d81 ("acpi/processor: Prevent cpu hotplug deadlock") except this is for acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe(): "The problem is that the work is scheduled on the current CPU from the hotplug thread associated with that CPU. It's not required to invoke these functions via the workqueue because the hotplug thread runs on the target CPU already. Check whether current is a per cpu thread pinned on the target CPU and invoke the function directly to avoid the workqueue." WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected ------------------------------------------------------ cpuhp/1/15 is trying to acquire lock: ffffc90003447a28 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x4c6/0x630 but task is already holding lock: ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: cpus_read_lock+0x3e/0xc0 irq_calc_affinity_vectors+0x5f/0x91 __pci_enable_msix_range+0x10f/0x9a0 pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity+0x13e/0x1f0 pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity at drivers/pci/msi.c:1208 pqi_ctrl_init+0x72f/0x1618 [smartpqi] pqi_pci_probe.cold.63+0x882/0x892 [smartpqi] local_pci_probe+0x7a/0xc0 work_for_cpu_fn+0x2e/0x50 process_one_work+0x57e/0xb90 worker_thread+0x363/0x5b0 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0 lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680 __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630 work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160 acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250 acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580 acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740 acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140 acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0 smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&wfc.work) --> cpuhp_state-up --> cpuidle_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(cpuidle_lock); lock(cpuhp_state-up); lock(cpuidle_lock); lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work)); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by cpuhp/1/15: #0: ffffffffaf51ab10 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0 #1: ffffffffaf51ad40 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0 #2: ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xa0/0xea print_circular_bug.cold.52+0x147/0x14c check_noncircular+0x295/0x2d0 __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0 lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680 __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630 work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160 acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250 acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580 acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740 acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140 acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0 smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> [ rjw: Subject ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
commit d3ec10a upstream. A lockdep circular locking dependency report was seen when running a keyutils test: [12537.027242] ====================================================== [12537.059309] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [12537.088148] 4.18.0-147.7.1.el8_1.x86_64+debug #1 Tainted: G OE --------- - - [12537.125253] ------------------------------------------------------ [12537.153189] keyctl/25598 is trying to acquire lock: [12537.175087] 000000007c39f96c (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12537.208365] [12537.208365] but task is already holding lock: [12537.234507] 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220 [12537.270476] [12537.270476] which lock already depends on the new lock. [12537.270476] [12537.307209] [12537.307209] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [12537.340754] [12537.340754] -> #3 (&type->lock_class){++++}: [12537.367434] down_write+0x4d/0x110 [12537.385202] __key_link_begin+0x87/0x280 [12537.405232] request_key_and_link+0x483/0xf70 [12537.427221] request_key+0x3c/0x80 [12537.444839] dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver] [12537.468445] dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs] [12537.496731] cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs] [12537.519418] cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs] [12537.546263] cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs] [12537.573551] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs] [12537.601045] kthread+0x30c/0x3d0 [12537.617906] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [12537.636225] [12537.636225] -> #2 (root_key_user.cons_lock){+.+.}: [12537.664525] __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0 [12537.683734] request_key_and_link+0x35a/0xf70 [12537.705640] request_key+0x3c/0x80 [12537.723304] dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver] [12537.746773] dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs] [12537.775607] cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs] [12537.798322] cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs] [12537.823369] cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs] [12537.847262] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs] [12537.873477] kthread+0x30c/0x3d0 [12537.890281] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [12537.908649] [12537.908649] -> #1 (&tcp_ses->srv_mutex){+.+.}: [12537.935225] __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0 [12537.954450] cifs_call_async+0x102/0x7f0 [cifs] [12537.977250] smb2_async_readv+0x6c3/0xc90 [cifs] [12538.000659] cifs_readpages+0x120a/0x1e50 [cifs] [12538.023920] read_pages+0xf5/0x560 [12538.041583] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x41d/0x4b0 [12538.067047] ondemand_readahead+0x44c/0xc10 [12538.092069] filemap_fault+0xec1/0x1830 [12538.111637] __do_fault+0x82/0x260 [12538.129216] do_fault+0x419/0xfb0 [12538.146390] __handle_mm_fault+0x862/0xdf0 [12538.167408] handle_mm_fault+0x154/0x550 [12538.187401] __do_page_fault+0x42f/0xa60 [12538.207395] do_page_fault+0x38/0x5e0 [12538.225777] page_fault+0x1e/0x30 [12538.243010] [12538.243010] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: [12538.267875] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420 [12538.286848] __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0 [12538.306006] keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170 [12538.327936] assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280 [12538.352154] keyring_read+0xe9/0x110 [12538.370558] keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220 [12538.391470] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0 [12538.410511] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf [12538.435535] [12538.435535] other info that might help us debug this: [12538.435535] [12538.472829] Chain exists of: [12538.472829] &mm->mmap_sem --> root_key_user.cons_lock --> &type->lock_class [12538.472829] [12538.524820] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [12538.524820] [12538.551431] CPU0 CPU1 [12538.572654] ---- ---- [12538.595865] lock(&type->lock_class); [12538.613737] lock(root_key_user.cons_lock); [12538.644234] lock(&type->lock_class); [12538.672410] lock(&mm->mmap_sem); [12538.687758] [12538.687758] *** DEADLOCK *** [12538.687758] [12538.714455] 1 lock held by keyctl/25598: [12538.732097] #0: 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220 [12538.770573] [12538.770573] stack backtrace: [12538.790136] CPU: 2 PID: 25598 Comm: keyctl Kdump: loaded Tainted: G [12538.844855] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9/ProLiant DL360 Gen9, BIOS P89 12/27/2015 [12538.881963] Call Trace: [12538.892897] dump_stack+0x9a/0xf0 [12538.907908] print_circular_bug.isra.25.cold.50+0x1bc/0x279 [12538.932891] ? save_trace+0xd6/0x250 [12538.948979] check_prev_add.constprop.32+0xc36/0x14f0 [12538.971643] ? keyring_compare_object+0x104/0x190 [12538.992738] ? check_usage+0x550/0x550 [12539.009845] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 [12539.025484] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x1e0 [12539.043555] __lock_acquire+0x1f12/0x38d0 [12539.061551] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x10/0x10 [12539.080554] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420 [12539.100330] ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12539.119079] __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0 [12539.135869] ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12539.153234] keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170 [12539.172787] ? keyring_read+0x110/0x110 [12539.190059] assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280 [12539.211526] keyring_read+0xe9/0x110 [12539.227561] ? keyring_gc_check_iterator+0xc0/0xc0 [12539.249076] keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220 [12539.266660] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0 [12539.283091] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf One way to prevent this deadlock scenario from happening is to not allow writing to userspace while holding the key semaphore. Instead, an internal buffer is allocated for getting the keys out from the read method first before copying them out to userspace without holding the lock. That requires taking out the __user modifier from all the relevant read methods as well as additional changes to not use any userspace write helpers. That is, 1) The put_user() call is replaced by a direct copy. 2) The copy_to_user() call is replaced by memcpy(). 3) All the fault handling code is removed. Compiling on a x86-64 system, the size of the rxrpc_read() function is reduced from 3795 bytes to 2384 bytes with this patch. Fixes: ^1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
commit 056ad39 upstream. FuzzUSB (a variant of syzkaller) found a free-while-still-in-use bug in the USB scatter-gather library: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in atomic_read include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:26 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in usb_hcd_unlink_urb+0x5f/0x170 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1607 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888065379610 by task kworker/u4:1/27 CPU: 1 PID: 27 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Not tainted 5.5.11 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: scsi_tmf_2 scmd_eh_abort_handler Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0xce/0x128 lib/dump_stack.c:118 print_address_description.constprop.4+0x21/0x3c0 mm/kasan/report.c:374 __kasan_report+0x153/0x1cb mm/kasan/report.c:506 kasan_report+0x12/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:639 check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:185 [inline] check_memory_region+0x152/0x1b0 mm/kasan/generic.c:192 __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:95 atomic_read include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:26 [inline] usb_hcd_unlink_urb+0x5f/0x170 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1607 usb_unlink_urb+0x72/0xb0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:657 usb_sg_cancel+0x14e/0x290 drivers/usb/core/message.c:602 usb_stor_stop_transport+0x5e/0xa0 drivers/usb/storage/transport.c:937 This bug occurs when cancellation of the S-G transfer races with transfer completion. When that happens, usb_sg_cancel() may continue to access the transfer's URBs after usb_sg_wait() has freed them. The bug is caused by the fact that usb_sg_cancel() does not take any sort of reference to the transfer, and so there is nothing to prevent the URBs from being deallocated while the routine is trying to use them. The fix is to take such a reference by incrementing the transfer's io->count field while the cancellation is in progres and decrementing it afterward. The transfer's URBs are not deallocated until io->complete is triggered, which happens when io->count reaches zero. Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Reported-and-tested-by: Kyungtae Kim <kt0755@gmail.com> CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Pine.LNX.4.44L0.2003281615140.14837-100000@netrider.rowland.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
…f fs_info::journal_info commit fcc9973 upstream. [BUG] One run of btrfs/063 triggered the following lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.6.0-rc7-custom+ #48 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- kworker/u24:0/7 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(sb_internal#2); lock(sb_internal#2); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by kworker/u24:0/7: #0: ffff88817b495948 ((wq_completion)btrfs-endio-write){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80 #1: ffff888189ea7db8 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80 #2: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] #3: ffff888174ca4da8 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}, at: btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x83/0xd0 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/u24:0 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc7-custom+ #48 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] Call Trace: dump_stack+0xc2/0x11a __lock_acquire.cold+0xce/0x214 lock_acquire+0xe6/0x210 __sb_start_write+0x14e/0x290 start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs] find_free_extent+0x1504/0x1a50 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xd5/0x1f0 [btrfs] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x1ac/0x570 [btrfs] btrfs_copy_root+0x213/0x580 [btrfs] create_reloc_root+0x3bd/0x470 [btrfs] btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2d2/0x310 [btrfs] record_root_in_trans+0x191/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x90/0xd0 [btrfs] start_transaction+0x16e/0x890 [btrfs] btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x55d/0xcd0 [btrfs] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0x116/0x9a0 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x632/0xb80 worker_thread+0x80/0x690 kthread+0x1a3/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 It's pretty hard to reproduce, only one hit so far. [CAUSE] This is because we're calling btrfs_join_transaction() without re-using the current running one: btrfs_finish_ordered_io() |- btrfs_join_transaction() <<< Call #1 |- btrfs_record_root_in_trans() |- btrfs_reserve_extent() |- btrfs_join_transaction() <<< Call #2 Normally such btrfs_join_transaction() call should re-use the existing one, without trying to re-start a transaction. But the problem is, in btrfs_join_transaction() call #1, we call btrfs_record_root_in_trans() before initializing current::journal_info. And in btrfs_join_transaction() call #2, we're relying on current::journal_info to avoid such deadlock. [FIX] Call btrfs_record_root_in_trans() after we have initialized current::journal_info. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
…dency [ Upstream commit 7809f70 ] On a very heavily loaded D05 with GICv4, I managed to trigger the following lockdep splat: [ 6022.598864] ====================================================== [ 6022.605031] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 6022.611200] 5.6.0-rc4-00026-geee7c7b0f498 #680 Tainted: G E [ 6022.618061] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 6022.624227] qemu-system-aar/7569 is trying to acquire lock: [ 6022.629789] ffff042f97606808 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}, at: try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0 [ 6022.637102] [ 6022.637102] but task is already holding lock: [ 6022.642921] ffff002fae424cf0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98 [ 6022.651350] [ 6022.651350] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 6022.651350] [ 6022.659512] [ 6022.659512] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 6022.666980] [ 6022.666980] -> #2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}: [ 6022.672983] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78 [ 6022.677848] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98 [ 6022.682453] irq_set_vcpu_affinity+0x40/0xc0 [ 6022.687236] its_make_vpe_non_resident+0x6c/0xb8 [ 6022.692364] vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70 [ 6022.696273] vgic_v3_put+0x20/0xd8 [ 6022.700183] kvm_vgic_put+0x30/0x48 [ 6022.704182] kvm_arch_vcpu_put+0x34/0x50 [ 6022.708614] kvm_sched_out+0x34/0x50 [ 6022.712700] __schedule+0x4bc/0x7f8 [ 6022.716697] schedule+0x50/0xd8 [ 6022.720347] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x5f0/0x978 [ 6022.725473] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8 [ 6022.729820] ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0 [ 6022.733642] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.738074] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8 [ 6022.743373] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6022.747198] el0_svc+0x14/0x40 [ 6022.750761] el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8 [ 6022.755278] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6022.759100] [ 6022.759100] -> #1 (&rq->lock){-.-.}: [ 6022.764143] _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50 [ 6022.768314] task_fork_fair+0x40/0x128 [ 6022.772572] sched_fork+0xe0/0x210 [ 6022.776484] copy_process+0x8c4/0x18d8 [ 6022.780742] _do_fork+0x88/0x6d8 [ 6022.784478] kernel_thread+0x64/0x88 [ 6022.788563] rest_init+0x30/0x270 [ 6022.792390] arch_call_rest_init+0x14/0x1c [ 6022.796995] start_kernel+0x498/0x4c4 [ 6022.801164] [ 6022.801164] -> #0 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}: [ 6022.806382] __lock_acquire+0xdd8/0x15c8 [ 6022.810813] lock_acquire+0xd0/0x218 [ 6022.814896] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78 [ 6022.819761] try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0 [ 6022.824018] wake_up_process+0x1c/0x28 [ 6022.828276] wakeup_softirqd+0x38/0x40 [ 6022.832533] __tasklet_schedule_common+0xc4/0xf0 [ 6022.837658] __tasklet_schedule+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.842176] check_irq_resend+0xc8/0x158 [ 6022.846609] irq_startup+0x74/0x128 [ 6022.850606] __enable_irq+0x6c/0x78 [ 6022.854602] enable_irq+0x54/0xa0 [ 6022.858431] its_make_vpe_non_resident+0xa4/0xb8 [ 6022.863557] vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70 [ 6022.867469] kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking+0x28/0x38 [ 6022.872336] kvm_vcpu_block+0x48/0x490 [ 6022.876594] kvm_handle_wfx+0x18c/0x310 [ 6022.880938] handle_exit+0x138/0x198 [ 6022.885022] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x4d4/0x978 [ 6022.890148] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8 [ 6022.894494] ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0 [ 6022.898317] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.902748] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8 [ 6022.908046] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6022.911871] el0_svc+0x14/0x40 [ 6022.915434] el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8 [ 6022.919951] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6022.923773] [ 6022.923773] other info that might help us debug this: [ 6022.923773] [ 6022.931762] Chain exists of: [ 6022.931762] &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock --> &irq_desc_lock_class [ 6022.931762] [ 6022.942101] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 6022.942101] [ 6022.948007] CPU0 CPU1 [ 6022.952523] ---- ---- [ 6022.957039] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); [ 6022.961036] lock(&rq->lock); [ 6022.966595] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); [ 6022.973109] lock(&p->pi_lock); [ 6022.976324] [ 6022.976324] *** DEADLOCK *** This is happening because we have a pending doorbell that requires retrigger. As SW retriggering is done in a tasklet, we trigger the circular dependency above. The easy cop-out is to provide a retrigger callback that doesn't require acquiring any extra lock. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200310184921.23552-5-maz@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
commit f0cc2cd upstream. During unmount we can have a job from the delayed inode items work queue still running, that can lead to at least two bad things: 1) A crash, because the worker can try to create a transaction just after the fs roots were freed; 2) A transaction leak, because the worker can create a transaction before the fs roots are freed and just after we committed the last transaction and after we stopped the transaction kthread. A stack trace example of the crash: [79011.691214] kernel BUG at lib/radix-tree.c:982! [79011.692056] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [79011.693180] CPU: 3 PID: 1394 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Tainted: G W 5.6.0-rc2-btrfs-next-54 #2 (...) [79011.696789] Workqueue: btrfs-delayed-meta btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [79011.697904] RIP: 0010:radix_tree_tag_set+0xe7/0x170 (...) [79011.702014] RSP: 0018:ffffb3c84a317ca0 EFLAGS: 00010293 [79011.702949] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [79011.704202] RDX: ffffb3c84a317cb0 RSI: ffffb3c84a317ca8 RDI: ffff8db3931340a0 [79011.705463] RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: ffffffff974629d0 [79011.706756] R10: ffffb3c84a317bc0 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8db393134000 [79011.708010] R13: ffff8db3931340a0 R14: ffff8db393134068 R15: 0000000000000001 [79011.709270] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8db3b6a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [79011.710699] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [79011.711710] CR2: 00007f22c2a0a000 CR3: 0000000232ad4005 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [79011.712958] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [79011.714205] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [79011.715448] Call Trace: [79011.715925] record_root_in_trans+0x72/0xf0 [btrfs] [79011.716819] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x4b/0x70 [btrfs] [79011.717925] start_transaction+0xdd/0x5c0 [btrfs] [79011.718829] btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x17e/0x2b0 [btrfs] [79011.719915] btrfs_work_helper+0xaa/0x720 [btrfs] [79011.720773] process_one_work+0x26d/0x6a0 [79011.721497] worker_thread+0x4f/0x3e0 [79011.722153] ? process_one_work+0x6a0/0x6a0 [79011.722901] kthread+0x103/0x140 [79011.723481] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [79011.724379] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 (...) The following diagram shows a sequence of steps that lead to the crash during ummount of the filesystem: CPU 1 CPU 2 CPU 3 btrfs_punch_hole() btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() btrfs_balance_delayed_items() --> sees fs_info->delayed_root->items with value 200, which is greater than BTRFS_DELAYED_BACKGROUND (128) and smaller than BTRFS_DELAYED_WRITEBACK (512) btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node() --> queues a job for fs_info->delayed_workers to run btrfs_async_run_delayed_root() btrfs_async_run_delayed_root() --> job queued by CPU 1 --> starts picking and running delayed nodes from the prepare_list list close_ctree() btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() btrfs_commit_super() btrfs_join_transaction() --> gets transaction N btrfs_commit_transaction(N) --> set transaction state to TRANTS_STATE_COMMIT_START btrfs_first_prepared_delayed_node() --> picks delayed node X through the prepared_list list btrfs_run_delayed_items() btrfs_first_delayed_node() --> also picks delayed node X but through the node_list list __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items() --> runs all delayed items from this node and drops the node's item count to 0 through call to btrfs_release_delayed_inode() --> finishes running any remaining delayed nodes --> finishes transaction commit --> stops cleaner and transaction threads btrfs_free_fs_roots() --> frees all roots and removes them from the radix tree fs_info->fs_roots_radix btrfs_join_transaction() start_transaction() btrfs_record_root_in_trans() record_root_in_trans() radix_tree_tag_set() --> crashes because the root is not in the radix tree anymore If the worker is able to call btrfs_join_transaction() before the unmount task frees the fs roots, we end up leaking a transaction and all its resources, since after the call to btrfs_commit_super() and stopping the transaction kthread, we don't expect to have any transaction open anymore. When this situation happens the worker has a delayed node that has no more items to run, since the task calling btrfs_run_delayed_items(), which is doing a transaction commit, picks the same node and runs all its items first. We can not wait for the worker to complete when running delayed items through btrfs_run_delayed_items(), because we call that function in several phases of a transaction commit, and that could cause a deadlock because the worker calls btrfs_join_transaction() and the task doing the transaction commit may have already set the transaction state to TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING. Also it's not possible to get into a situation where only some of the items of a delayed node are added to the fs/subvolume tree in the current transaction and the remaining ones in the next transaction, because when running the items of a delayed inode we lock its mutex, effectively waiting for the worker if the worker is running the items of the delayed node already. Since this can only cause issues when unmounting a filesystem, fix it in a simple way by waiting for any jobs on the delayed workers queue before calling btrfs_commit_supper() at close_ctree(). This works because at this point no one can call btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() or btrfs_balance_delayed_items(), and if we end up waiting for any worker to complete, btrfs_commit_super() will commit the transaction created by the worker. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
commit 351cbf6 upstream. Zygo reported the following lockdep splat while testing the balance patches ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.6.0-c6f0579d496a+ #53 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/1133 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888092f622c0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8fc5f860 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.91+0x29/0x30 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x19/0x20 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x32/0x740 add_block_entry+0x45/0x260 btrfs_ref_tree_mod+0x6e2/0x8b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x789/0x880 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0xc6/0xf0 __btrfs_cow_block+0x270/0x940 btrfs_cow_block+0x1ba/0x3a0 btrfs_search_slot+0x999/0x1030 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x81/0xe0 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x128/0x7d0 __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0xf4/0x2a0 btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13/0x20 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x5cc/0x1390 insert_balance_item.isra.39+0x6b2/0x6e0 btrfs_balance+0x72d/0x18d0 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3de/0x4c0 btrfs_ioctl+0x30ab/0x44a0 ksys_ioctl+0xa1/0xe0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x77/0x2c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}: __lock_acquire+0x197e/0x2550 lock_acquire+0x103/0x220 __mutex_lock+0x13d/0xce0 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x49/0x50 btrfs_evict_inode+0x6fc/0x900 evict+0x19a/0x2c0 dispose_list+0xa0/0xe0 prune_icache_sb+0xbd/0xf0 super_cache_scan+0x1b5/0x250 do_shrink_slab+0x1f6/0x530 shrink_slab+0x32e/0x410 shrink_node+0x2a5/0xba0 balance_pgdat+0x4bd/0x8a0 kswapd+0x35a/0x800 kthread+0x1e9/0x210 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/1133: #0: ffffffff8fc5f860 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff8fc380d8 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}, at: shrink_slab+0x1e8/0x410 #2: ffff8881e0e6c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#42){++++}, at: trylock_super+0x1b/0x70 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 1133 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.6.0-c6f0579d496a+ #53 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xc1/0x11a print_circular_bug.isra.38.cold.57+0x145/0x14a check_noncircular+0x2a9/0x2f0 ? print_circular_bug.isra.38+0x130/0x130 ? stack_trace_consume_entry+0x90/0x90 ? save_trace+0x3cc/0x420 __lock_acquire+0x197e/0x2550 ? btrfs_inode_clear_file_extent_range+0x9b/0xb0 ? register_lock_class+0x960/0x960 lock_acquire+0x103/0x220 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 __mutex_lock+0x13d/0xce0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 ? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20 ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0xeb/0x190 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0xc20/0xc20 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? check_chain_key+0x1e6/0x2e0 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x49/0x50 btrfs_evict_inode+0x6fc/0x900 ? btrfs_setattr+0x840/0x840 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140 evict+0x19a/0x2c0 dispose_list+0xa0/0xe0 prune_icache_sb+0xbd/0xf0 ? invalidate_inodes+0x310/0x310 super_cache_scan+0x1b5/0x250 do_shrink_slab+0x1f6/0x530 shrink_slab+0x32e/0x410 ? do_shrink_slab+0x530/0x530 ? do_shrink_slab+0x530/0x530 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? mem_cgroup_protected+0x13d/0x260 shrink_node+0x2a5/0xba0 balance_pgdat+0x4bd/0x8a0 ? mem_cgroup_shrink_node+0x490/0x490 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x40 ? finish_task_switch+0xce/0x390 ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0 kswapd+0x35a/0x800 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4c/0x60 ? balance_pgdat+0x8a0/0x8a0 ? finish_wait+0x110/0x110 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? __kthread_parkme+0xc6/0xe0 ? balance_pgdat+0x8a0/0x8a0 kthread+0x1e9/0x210 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 This is because we hold that delayed node's mutex while doing tree operations. Fix this by just wrapping the searches in nofs. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
commit 28936b6 upstream. inode->i_blocks could be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN, BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ext4_do_update_inode [ext4] / inode_add_bytes write to 0xffff9a00d4b982d0 of 8 bytes by task 22100 on cpu 118: inode_add_bytes+0x65/0xf0 __inode_add_bytes at fs/stat.c:689 (inlined by) inode_add_bytes at fs/stat.c:702 ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x418/0xca0 [ext4] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1a6b/0x27b0 [ext4] ext4_map_blocks+0x1a9/0x950 [ext4] _ext4_get_block+0xfc/0x270 [ext4] ext4_get_block_unwritten+0x33/0x50 [ext4] __block_write_begin_int+0x22e/0xae0 __block_write_begin+0x39/0x50 ext4_write_begin+0x388/0xb50 [ext4] ext4_da_write_begin+0x35f/0x8f0 [ext4] generic_perform_write+0x15d/0x290 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4] ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4] new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0 __vfs_write+0x92/0xa0 vfs_write+0x103/0x260 ksys_write+0x9d/0x130 __x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe read to 0xffff9a00d4b982d0 of 8 bytes by task 8 on cpu 65: ext4_do_update_inode+0x4a0/0xf60 [ext4] ext4_inode_blocks_set at fs/ext4/inode.c:4815 ext4_mark_iloc_dirty+0xaf/0x160 [ext4] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x129/0x3e0 [ext4] ext4_convert_unwritten_extents+0x253/0x2d0 [ext4] ext4_convert_unwritten_io_end_vec+0xc5/0x150 [ext4] ext4_end_io_rsv_work+0x22c/0x350 [ext4] process_one_work+0x54f/0xb90 worker_thread+0x80/0x5f0 kthread+0x1cd/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 4 locks held by kworker/u256:0/8: #0: ffff9a025abc4328 ((wq_completion)ext4-rsv-conversion){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0xb90 #1: ffffab5a862dbe20 ((work_completion)(&ei->i_rsv_conversion_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0xb90 #2: ffff9a025a9d0f58 (jbd2_handle){++++}, at: start_this_handle+0x1c1/0x9d0 [jbd2] #3: ffff9a00d4b985d8 (&(&ei->i_raw_lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: ext4_do_update_inode+0xaa/0xf60 [ext4] irq event stamp: 3009267 hardirqs last enabled at (3009267): [<ffffffff980da9b7>] __find_get_block+0x107/0x790 hardirqs last disabled at (3009266): [<ffffffff980da8f9>] __find_get_block+0x49/0x790 softirqs last enabled at (3009230): [<ffffffff98a0034c>] __do_softirq+0x34c/0x57c softirqs last disabled at (3009223): [<ffffffff97cc67a2>] irq_exit+0xa2/0xc0 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 65 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u256:0 Tainted: G L 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200221+ #7 Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019 Workqueue: ext4-rsv-conversion ext4_end_io_rsv_work [ext4] The plain read is outside of inode->i_lock critical section which results in a data race. Fix it by adding READ_ONCE() there. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200222043258.2279-1-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
[ Upstream commit a866759 ] This reverts commit 64e62bd. This commit ends up causing some lockdep splats due to trying to grab the payload lock while holding the mgr's lock: [ 54.010099] [ 54.011765] ====================================================== [ 54.018670] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 54.025577] 5.5.0-rc6-02274-g77381c23ee63 #47 Not tainted [ 54.031610] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 54.038516] kworker/1:6/1040 is trying to acquire lock: [ 54.044354] ffff888272af3228 (&mgr->payload_lock){+.+.}, at: drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.054957] [ 54.054957] but task is already holding lock: [ 54.061473] ffff888272af3060 (&mgr->lock){+.+.}, at: drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x3c/0x2e4 [ 54.071193] [ 54.071193] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 54.071193] [ 54.080334] [ 54.080334] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 54.088697] [ 54.088697] -> #1 (&mgr->lock){+.+.}: [ 54.094440] __mutex_lock+0xc3/0x498 [ 54.099015] drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated+0x25/0x80 [ 54.106018] drm_dp_update_payload_part1+0xa2/0x2e2 [ 54.112051] intel_mst_pre_enable_dp+0x144/0x18f [ 54.117791] intel_encoders_pre_enable+0x63/0x70 [ 54.123532] hsw_crtc_enable+0xa1/0x722 [ 54.128396] intel_update_crtc+0x50/0x194 [ 54.133455] skl_commit_modeset_enables+0x40c/0x540 [ 54.139485] intel_atomic_commit_tail+0x5f7/0x130d [ 54.145418] intel_atomic_commit+0x2c8/0x2d8 [ 54.150770] drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x5a/0x70 [ 54.156801] drm_mode_setcrtc+0x2ab/0x833 [ 54.161862] drm_ioctl+0x2e5/0x424 [ 54.166242] vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x2f [ 54.170426] do_vfs_ioctl+0x5fb/0x61e [ 54.175096] ksys_ioctl+0x55/0x75 [ 54.179377] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x1e [ 54.184146] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x6d [ 54.188721] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 54.194946] [ 54.194946] -> #0 (&mgr->payload_lock){+.+.}: [ 54.201463] [ 54.201463] other info that might help us debug this: [ 54.201463] [ 54.210410] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 54.210410] [ 54.217025] CPU0 CPU1 [ 54.222082] ---- ---- [ 54.227138] lock(&mgr->lock); [ 54.230643] lock(&mgr->payload_lock); [ 54.237742] lock(&mgr->lock); [ 54.244062] lock(&mgr->payload_lock); [ 54.248346] [ 54.248346] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 54.248346] [ 54.254959] 7 locks held by kworker/1:6/1040: [ 54.259822] #0: ffff888275c4f528 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: worker_thread+0x455/0x6e2 [ 54.269451] #1: ffffc9000119beb0 ((work_completion)(&(&dev_priv->hotplug.hotplug_work)->work)){+.+.}, at: worker_thread+0x455/0x6e2 [ 54.282768] #2: ffff888272a403f0 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}, at: i915_hotplug_work_func+0x4b/0x2be [ 54.293368] #3: ffffffff824fc6c0 (drm_connector_list_iter){.+.+}, at: i915_hotplug_work_func+0x17e/0x2be [ 54.304061] #4: ffffc9000119bc58 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}, at: drm_helper_probe_detect_ctx+0x40/0xfd [ 54.314855] #5: ffff888272a40470 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}, at: drm_modeset_lock+0x74/0xe2 [ 54.324385] #6: ffff888272af3060 (&mgr->lock){+.+.}, at: drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x3c/0x2e4 [ 54.334597] [ 54.334597] stack backtrace: [ 54.339464] CPU: 1 PID: 1040 Comm: kworker/1:6 Not tainted 5.5.0-rc6-02274-g77381c23ee63 #47 [ 54.348893] Hardware name: Google Fizz/Fizz, BIOS Google_Fizz.10139.39.0 01/04/2018 [ 54.357451] Workqueue: events i915_hotplug_work_func [ 54.362995] Call Trace: [ 54.365724] dump_stack+0x71/0x9c [ 54.369427] check_noncircular+0x91/0xbc [ 54.373809] ? __lock_acquire+0xc9e/0xf66 [ 54.378286] ? __lock_acquire+0xc9e/0xf66 [ 54.382763] ? lock_acquire+0x175/0x1ac [ 54.387048] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.393177] ? __mutex_lock+0xc3/0x498 [ 54.397362] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.403492] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.409620] ? drm_dp_dpcd_access+0xd9/0x101 [ 54.414390] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.420517] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.426645] ? intel_digital_port_connected+0x34d/0x35c [ 54.432482] ? intel_dp_detect+0x227/0x44e [ 54.437056] ? ww_mutex_lock+0x49/0x9a [ 54.441242] ? drm_helper_probe_detect_ctx+0x75/0xfd [ 54.446789] ? intel_encoder_hotplug+0x4b/0x97 [ 54.451752] ? intel_ddi_hotplug+0x61/0x2e0 [ 54.456423] ? mark_held_locks+0x53/0x68 [ 54.460803] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3a/0x51 [ 54.466347] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x187/0x1a4 [ 54.471310] ? drm_connector_list_iter_next+0x89/0x9a [ 54.476953] ? i915_hotplug_work_func+0x206/0x2be [ 54.482208] ? worker_thread+0x4d5/0x6e2 [ 54.486587] ? worker_thread+0x455/0x6e2 [ 54.490966] ? queue_work_on+0x64/0x64 [ 54.495151] ? kthread+0x1e9/0x1f1 [ 54.498946] ? queue_work_on+0x64/0x64 [ 54.503130] ? kthread_unpark+0x5e/0x5e [ 54.507413] ? ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 The proper fix for this is probably cleanup the VCPI allocations when we're enabling the topology, or on the first payload allocation. For now though, let's just revert. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Fixes: 64e62bd ("drm/dp_mst: Remove VCPI while disabling topology mgr") Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run> Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117205149.97262-1-lyude@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
[ Upstream commit 696ac2e ] Similar to commit 0266d81 ("acpi/processor: Prevent cpu hotplug deadlock") except this is for acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe(): "The problem is that the work is scheduled on the current CPU from the hotplug thread associated with that CPU. It's not required to invoke these functions via the workqueue because the hotplug thread runs on the target CPU already. Check whether current is a per cpu thread pinned on the target CPU and invoke the function directly to avoid the workqueue." WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected ------------------------------------------------------ cpuhp/1/15 is trying to acquire lock: ffffc90003447a28 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x4c6/0x630 but task is already holding lock: ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: cpus_read_lock+0x3e/0xc0 irq_calc_affinity_vectors+0x5f/0x91 __pci_enable_msix_range+0x10f/0x9a0 pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity+0x13e/0x1f0 pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity at drivers/pci/msi.c:1208 pqi_ctrl_init+0x72f/0x1618 [smartpqi] pqi_pci_probe.cold.63+0x882/0x892 [smartpqi] local_pci_probe+0x7a/0xc0 work_for_cpu_fn+0x2e/0x50 process_one_work+0x57e/0xb90 worker_thread+0x363/0x5b0 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0 lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680 __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630 work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160 acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250 acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580 acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740 acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140 acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0 smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&wfc.work) --> cpuhp_state-up --> cpuidle_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(cpuidle_lock); lock(cpuhp_state-up); lock(cpuidle_lock); lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work)); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by cpuhp/1/15: #0: ffffffffaf51ab10 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0 #1: ffffffffaf51ad40 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0 #2: ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xa0/0xea print_circular_bug.cold.52+0x147/0x14c check_noncircular+0x295/0x2d0 __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0 lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680 __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630 work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160 acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250 acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580 acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740 acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140 acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0 smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> [ rjw: Subject ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
commit d3ec10a upstream. A lockdep circular locking dependency report was seen when running a keyutils test: [12537.027242] ====================================================== [12537.059309] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [12537.088148] 4.18.0-147.7.1.el8_1.x86_64+debug #1 Tainted: G OE --------- - - [12537.125253] ------------------------------------------------------ [12537.153189] keyctl/25598 is trying to acquire lock: [12537.175087] 000000007c39f96c (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12537.208365] [12537.208365] but task is already holding lock: [12537.234507] 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220 [12537.270476] [12537.270476] which lock already depends on the new lock. [12537.270476] [12537.307209] [12537.307209] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [12537.340754] [12537.340754] -> #3 (&type->lock_class){++++}: [12537.367434] down_write+0x4d/0x110 [12537.385202] __key_link_begin+0x87/0x280 [12537.405232] request_key_and_link+0x483/0xf70 [12537.427221] request_key+0x3c/0x80 [12537.444839] dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver] [12537.468445] dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs] [12537.496731] cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs] [12537.519418] cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs] [12537.546263] cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs] [12537.573551] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs] [12537.601045] kthread+0x30c/0x3d0 [12537.617906] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [12537.636225] [12537.636225] -> #2 (root_key_user.cons_lock){+.+.}: [12537.664525] __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0 [12537.683734] request_key_and_link+0x35a/0xf70 [12537.705640] request_key+0x3c/0x80 [12537.723304] dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver] [12537.746773] dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs] [12537.775607] cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs] [12537.798322] cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs] [12537.823369] cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs] [12537.847262] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs] [12537.873477] kthread+0x30c/0x3d0 [12537.890281] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [12537.908649] [12537.908649] -> #1 (&tcp_ses->srv_mutex){+.+.}: [12537.935225] __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0 [12537.954450] cifs_call_async+0x102/0x7f0 [cifs] [12537.977250] smb2_async_readv+0x6c3/0xc90 [cifs] [12538.000659] cifs_readpages+0x120a/0x1e50 [cifs] [12538.023920] read_pages+0xf5/0x560 [12538.041583] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x41d/0x4b0 [12538.067047] ondemand_readahead+0x44c/0xc10 [12538.092069] filemap_fault+0xec1/0x1830 [12538.111637] __do_fault+0x82/0x260 [12538.129216] do_fault+0x419/0xfb0 [12538.146390] __handle_mm_fault+0x862/0xdf0 [12538.167408] handle_mm_fault+0x154/0x550 [12538.187401] __do_page_fault+0x42f/0xa60 [12538.207395] do_page_fault+0x38/0x5e0 [12538.225777] page_fault+0x1e/0x30 [12538.243010] [12538.243010] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: [12538.267875] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420 [12538.286848] __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0 [12538.306006] keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170 [12538.327936] assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280 [12538.352154] keyring_read+0xe9/0x110 [12538.370558] keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220 [12538.391470] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0 [12538.410511] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf [12538.435535] [12538.435535] other info that might help us debug this: [12538.435535] [12538.472829] Chain exists of: [12538.472829] &mm->mmap_sem --> root_key_user.cons_lock --> &type->lock_class [12538.472829] [12538.524820] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [12538.524820] [12538.551431] CPU0 CPU1 [12538.572654] ---- ---- [12538.595865] lock(&type->lock_class); [12538.613737] lock(root_key_user.cons_lock); [12538.644234] lock(&type->lock_class); [12538.672410] lock(&mm->mmap_sem); [12538.687758] [12538.687758] *** DEADLOCK *** [12538.687758] [12538.714455] 1 lock held by keyctl/25598: [12538.732097] #0: 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220 [12538.770573] [12538.770573] stack backtrace: [12538.790136] CPU: 2 PID: 25598 Comm: keyctl Kdump: loaded Tainted: G [12538.844855] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9/ProLiant DL360 Gen9, BIOS P89 12/27/2015 [12538.881963] Call Trace: [12538.892897] dump_stack+0x9a/0xf0 [12538.907908] print_circular_bug.isra.25.cold.50+0x1bc/0x279 [12538.932891] ? save_trace+0xd6/0x250 [12538.948979] check_prev_add.constprop.32+0xc36/0x14f0 [12538.971643] ? keyring_compare_object+0x104/0x190 [12538.992738] ? check_usage+0x550/0x550 [12539.009845] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 [12539.025484] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x1e0 [12539.043555] __lock_acquire+0x1f12/0x38d0 [12539.061551] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x10/0x10 [12539.080554] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420 [12539.100330] ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12539.119079] __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0 [12539.135869] ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12539.153234] keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170 [12539.172787] ? keyring_read+0x110/0x110 [12539.190059] assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280 [12539.211526] keyring_read+0xe9/0x110 [12539.227561] ? keyring_gc_check_iterator+0xc0/0xc0 [12539.249076] keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220 [12539.266660] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0 [12539.283091] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf One way to prevent this deadlock scenario from happening is to not allow writing to userspace while holding the key semaphore. Instead, an internal buffer is allocated for getting the keys out from the read method first before copying them out to userspace without holding the lock. That requires taking out the __user modifier from all the relevant read methods as well as additional changes to not use any userspace write helpers. That is, 1) The put_user() call is replaced by a direct copy. 2) The copy_to_user() call is replaced by memcpy(). 3) All the fault handling code is removed. Compiling on a x86-64 system, the size of the rxrpc_read() function is reduced from 3795 bytes to 2384 bytes with this patch. Fixes: ^1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
commit 056ad39 upstream. FuzzUSB (a variant of syzkaller) found a free-while-still-in-use bug in the USB scatter-gather library: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in atomic_read include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:26 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in usb_hcd_unlink_urb+0x5f/0x170 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1607 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888065379610 by task kworker/u4:1/27 CPU: 1 PID: 27 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Not tainted 5.5.11 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: scsi_tmf_2 scmd_eh_abort_handler Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0xce/0x128 lib/dump_stack.c:118 print_address_description.constprop.4+0x21/0x3c0 mm/kasan/report.c:374 __kasan_report+0x153/0x1cb mm/kasan/report.c:506 kasan_report+0x12/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:639 check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:185 [inline] check_memory_region+0x152/0x1b0 mm/kasan/generic.c:192 __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:95 atomic_read include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:26 [inline] usb_hcd_unlink_urb+0x5f/0x170 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1607 usb_unlink_urb+0x72/0xb0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:657 usb_sg_cancel+0x14e/0x290 drivers/usb/core/message.c:602 usb_stor_stop_transport+0x5e/0xa0 drivers/usb/storage/transport.c:937 This bug occurs when cancellation of the S-G transfer races with transfer completion. When that happens, usb_sg_cancel() may continue to access the transfer's URBs after usb_sg_wait() has freed them. The bug is caused by the fact that usb_sg_cancel() does not take any sort of reference to the transfer, and so there is nothing to prevent the URBs from being deallocated while the routine is trying to use them. The fix is to take such a reference by incrementing the transfer's io->count field while the cancellation is in progres and decrementing it afterward. The transfer's URBs are not deallocated until io->complete is triggered, which happens when io->count reaches zero. Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Reported-and-tested-by: Kyungtae Kim <kt0755@gmail.com> CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Pine.LNX.4.44L0.2003281615140.14837-100000@netrider.rowland.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
…f fs_info::journal_info commit fcc9973 upstream. [BUG] One run of btrfs/063 triggered the following lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.6.0-rc7-custom+ #48 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- kworker/u24:0/7 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(sb_internal#2); lock(sb_internal#2); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by kworker/u24:0/7: #0: ffff88817b495948 ((wq_completion)btrfs-endio-write){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80 #1: ffff888189ea7db8 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80 #2: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] #3: ffff888174ca4da8 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}, at: btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x83/0xd0 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/u24:0 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc7-custom+ #48 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] Call Trace: dump_stack+0xc2/0x11a __lock_acquire.cold+0xce/0x214 lock_acquire+0xe6/0x210 __sb_start_write+0x14e/0x290 start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs] find_free_extent+0x1504/0x1a50 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xd5/0x1f0 [btrfs] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x1ac/0x570 [btrfs] btrfs_copy_root+0x213/0x580 [btrfs] create_reloc_root+0x3bd/0x470 [btrfs] btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2d2/0x310 [btrfs] record_root_in_trans+0x191/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x90/0xd0 [btrfs] start_transaction+0x16e/0x890 [btrfs] btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x55d/0xcd0 [btrfs] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0x116/0x9a0 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x632/0xb80 worker_thread+0x80/0x690 kthread+0x1a3/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 It's pretty hard to reproduce, only one hit so far. [CAUSE] This is because we're calling btrfs_join_transaction() without re-using the current running one: btrfs_finish_ordered_io() |- btrfs_join_transaction() <<< Call #1 |- btrfs_record_root_in_trans() |- btrfs_reserve_extent() |- btrfs_join_transaction() <<< Call #2 Normally such btrfs_join_transaction() call should re-use the existing one, without trying to re-start a transaction. But the problem is, in btrfs_join_transaction() call #1, we call btrfs_record_root_in_trans() before initializing current::journal_info. And in btrfs_join_transaction() call #2, we're relying on current::journal_info to avoid such deadlock. [FIX] Call btrfs_record_root_in_trans() after we have initialized current::journal_info. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
…dency [ Upstream commit 7809f70 ] On a very heavily loaded D05 with GICv4, I managed to trigger the following lockdep splat: [ 6022.598864] ====================================================== [ 6022.605031] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 6022.611200] 5.6.0-rc4-00026-geee7c7b0f498 #680 Tainted: G E [ 6022.618061] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 6022.624227] qemu-system-aar/7569 is trying to acquire lock: [ 6022.629789] ffff042f97606808 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}, at: try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0 [ 6022.637102] [ 6022.637102] but task is already holding lock: [ 6022.642921] ffff002fae424cf0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98 [ 6022.651350] [ 6022.651350] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 6022.651350] [ 6022.659512] [ 6022.659512] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 6022.666980] [ 6022.666980] -> #2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}: [ 6022.672983] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78 [ 6022.677848] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98 [ 6022.682453] irq_set_vcpu_affinity+0x40/0xc0 [ 6022.687236] its_make_vpe_non_resident+0x6c/0xb8 [ 6022.692364] vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70 [ 6022.696273] vgic_v3_put+0x20/0xd8 [ 6022.700183] kvm_vgic_put+0x30/0x48 [ 6022.704182] kvm_arch_vcpu_put+0x34/0x50 [ 6022.708614] kvm_sched_out+0x34/0x50 [ 6022.712700] __schedule+0x4bc/0x7f8 [ 6022.716697] schedule+0x50/0xd8 [ 6022.720347] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x5f0/0x978 [ 6022.725473] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8 [ 6022.729820] ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0 [ 6022.733642] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.738074] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8 [ 6022.743373] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6022.747198] el0_svc+0x14/0x40 [ 6022.750761] el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8 [ 6022.755278] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6022.759100] [ 6022.759100] -> #1 (&rq->lock){-.-.}: [ 6022.764143] _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50 [ 6022.768314] task_fork_fair+0x40/0x128 [ 6022.772572] sched_fork+0xe0/0x210 [ 6022.776484] copy_process+0x8c4/0x18d8 [ 6022.780742] _do_fork+0x88/0x6d8 [ 6022.784478] kernel_thread+0x64/0x88 [ 6022.788563] rest_init+0x30/0x270 [ 6022.792390] arch_call_rest_init+0x14/0x1c [ 6022.796995] start_kernel+0x498/0x4c4 [ 6022.801164] [ 6022.801164] -> #0 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}: [ 6022.806382] __lock_acquire+0xdd8/0x15c8 [ 6022.810813] lock_acquire+0xd0/0x218 [ 6022.814896] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78 [ 6022.819761] try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0 [ 6022.824018] wake_up_process+0x1c/0x28 [ 6022.828276] wakeup_softirqd+0x38/0x40 [ 6022.832533] __tasklet_schedule_common+0xc4/0xf0 [ 6022.837658] __tasklet_schedule+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.842176] check_irq_resend+0xc8/0x158 [ 6022.846609] irq_startup+0x74/0x128 [ 6022.850606] __enable_irq+0x6c/0x78 [ 6022.854602] enable_irq+0x54/0xa0 [ 6022.858431] its_make_vpe_non_resident+0xa4/0xb8 [ 6022.863557] vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70 [ 6022.867469] kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking+0x28/0x38 [ 6022.872336] kvm_vcpu_block+0x48/0x490 [ 6022.876594] kvm_handle_wfx+0x18c/0x310 [ 6022.880938] handle_exit+0x138/0x198 [ 6022.885022] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x4d4/0x978 [ 6022.890148] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8 [ 6022.894494] ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0 [ 6022.898317] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.902748] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8 [ 6022.908046] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6022.911871] el0_svc+0x14/0x40 [ 6022.915434] el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8 [ 6022.919951] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6022.923773] [ 6022.923773] other info that might help us debug this: [ 6022.923773] [ 6022.931762] Chain exists of: [ 6022.931762] &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock --> &irq_desc_lock_class [ 6022.931762] [ 6022.942101] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 6022.942101] [ 6022.948007] CPU0 CPU1 [ 6022.952523] ---- ---- [ 6022.957039] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); [ 6022.961036] lock(&rq->lock); [ 6022.966595] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); [ 6022.973109] lock(&p->pi_lock); [ 6022.976324] [ 6022.976324] *** DEADLOCK *** This is happening because we have a pending doorbell that requires retrigger. As SW retriggering is done in a tasklet, we trigger the circular dependency above. The easy cop-out is to provide a retrigger callback that doesn't require acquiring any extra lock. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200310184921.23552-5-maz@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
commit f0cc2cd upstream. During unmount we can have a job from the delayed inode items work queue still running, that can lead to at least two bad things: 1) A crash, because the worker can try to create a transaction just after the fs roots were freed; 2) A transaction leak, because the worker can create a transaction before the fs roots are freed and just after we committed the last transaction and after we stopped the transaction kthread. A stack trace example of the crash: [79011.691214] kernel BUG at lib/radix-tree.c:982! [79011.692056] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [79011.693180] CPU: 3 PID: 1394 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Tainted: G W 5.6.0-rc2-btrfs-next-54 #2 (...) [79011.696789] Workqueue: btrfs-delayed-meta btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [79011.697904] RIP: 0010:radix_tree_tag_set+0xe7/0x170 (...) [79011.702014] RSP: 0018:ffffb3c84a317ca0 EFLAGS: 00010293 [79011.702949] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [79011.704202] RDX: ffffb3c84a317cb0 RSI: ffffb3c84a317ca8 RDI: ffff8db3931340a0 [79011.705463] RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: ffffffff974629d0 [79011.706756] R10: ffffb3c84a317bc0 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8db393134000 [79011.708010] R13: ffff8db3931340a0 R14: ffff8db393134068 R15: 0000000000000001 [79011.709270] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8db3b6a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [79011.710699] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [79011.711710] CR2: 00007f22c2a0a000 CR3: 0000000232ad4005 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [79011.712958] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [79011.714205] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [79011.715448] Call Trace: [79011.715925] record_root_in_trans+0x72/0xf0 [btrfs] [79011.716819] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x4b/0x70 [btrfs] [79011.717925] start_transaction+0xdd/0x5c0 [btrfs] [79011.718829] btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x17e/0x2b0 [btrfs] [79011.719915] btrfs_work_helper+0xaa/0x720 [btrfs] [79011.720773] process_one_work+0x26d/0x6a0 [79011.721497] worker_thread+0x4f/0x3e0 [79011.722153] ? process_one_work+0x6a0/0x6a0 [79011.722901] kthread+0x103/0x140 [79011.723481] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [79011.724379] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 (...) The following diagram shows a sequence of steps that lead to the crash during ummount of the filesystem: CPU 1 CPU 2 CPU 3 btrfs_punch_hole() btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() btrfs_balance_delayed_items() --> sees fs_info->delayed_root->items with value 200, which is greater than BTRFS_DELAYED_BACKGROUND (128) and smaller than BTRFS_DELAYED_WRITEBACK (512) btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node() --> queues a job for fs_info->delayed_workers to run btrfs_async_run_delayed_root() btrfs_async_run_delayed_root() --> job queued by CPU 1 --> starts picking and running delayed nodes from the prepare_list list close_ctree() btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() btrfs_commit_super() btrfs_join_transaction() --> gets transaction N btrfs_commit_transaction(N) --> set transaction state to TRANTS_STATE_COMMIT_START btrfs_first_prepared_delayed_node() --> picks delayed node X through the prepared_list list btrfs_run_delayed_items() btrfs_first_delayed_node() --> also picks delayed node X but through the node_list list __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items() --> runs all delayed items from this node and drops the node's item count to 0 through call to btrfs_release_delayed_inode() --> finishes running any remaining delayed nodes --> finishes transaction commit --> stops cleaner and transaction threads btrfs_free_fs_roots() --> frees all roots and removes them from the radix tree fs_info->fs_roots_radix btrfs_join_transaction() start_transaction() btrfs_record_root_in_trans() record_root_in_trans() radix_tree_tag_set() --> crashes because the root is not in the radix tree anymore If the worker is able to call btrfs_join_transaction() before the unmount task frees the fs roots, we end up leaking a transaction and all its resources, since after the call to btrfs_commit_super() and stopping the transaction kthread, we don't expect to have any transaction open anymore. When this situation happens the worker has a delayed node that has no more items to run, since the task calling btrfs_run_delayed_items(), which is doing a transaction commit, picks the same node and runs all its items first. We can not wait for the worker to complete when running delayed items through btrfs_run_delayed_items(), because we call that function in several phases of a transaction commit, and that could cause a deadlock because the worker calls btrfs_join_transaction() and the task doing the transaction commit may have already set the transaction state to TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING. Also it's not possible to get into a situation where only some of the items of a delayed node are added to the fs/subvolume tree in the current transaction and the remaining ones in the next transaction, because when running the items of a delayed inode we lock its mutex, effectively waiting for the worker if the worker is running the items of the delayed node already. Since this can only cause issues when unmounting a filesystem, fix it in a simple way by waiting for any jobs on the delayed workers queue before calling btrfs_commit_supper() at close_ctree(). This works because at this point no one can call btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() or btrfs_balance_delayed_items(), and if we end up waiting for any worker to complete, btrfs_commit_super() will commit the transaction created by the worker. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
commit 28936b6 upstream. inode->i_blocks could be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN, BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ext4_do_update_inode [ext4] / inode_add_bytes write to 0xffff9a00d4b982d0 of 8 bytes by task 22100 on cpu 118: inode_add_bytes+0x65/0xf0 __inode_add_bytes at fs/stat.c:689 (inlined by) inode_add_bytes at fs/stat.c:702 ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x418/0xca0 [ext4] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1a6b/0x27b0 [ext4] ext4_map_blocks+0x1a9/0x950 [ext4] _ext4_get_block+0xfc/0x270 [ext4] ext4_get_block_unwritten+0x33/0x50 [ext4] __block_write_begin_int+0x22e/0xae0 __block_write_begin+0x39/0x50 ext4_write_begin+0x388/0xb50 [ext4] ext4_da_write_begin+0x35f/0x8f0 [ext4] generic_perform_write+0x15d/0x290 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4] ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4] new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0 __vfs_write+0x92/0xa0 vfs_write+0x103/0x260 ksys_write+0x9d/0x130 __x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe read to 0xffff9a00d4b982d0 of 8 bytes by task 8 on cpu 65: ext4_do_update_inode+0x4a0/0xf60 [ext4] ext4_inode_blocks_set at fs/ext4/inode.c:4815 ext4_mark_iloc_dirty+0xaf/0x160 [ext4] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x129/0x3e0 [ext4] ext4_convert_unwritten_extents+0x253/0x2d0 [ext4] ext4_convert_unwritten_io_end_vec+0xc5/0x150 [ext4] ext4_end_io_rsv_work+0x22c/0x350 [ext4] process_one_work+0x54f/0xb90 worker_thread+0x80/0x5f0 kthread+0x1cd/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 4 locks held by kworker/u256:0/8: #0: ffff9a025abc4328 ((wq_completion)ext4-rsv-conversion){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0xb90 #1: ffffab5a862dbe20 ((work_completion)(&ei->i_rsv_conversion_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0xb90 #2: ffff9a025a9d0f58 (jbd2_handle){++++}, at: start_this_handle+0x1c1/0x9d0 [jbd2] #3: ffff9a00d4b985d8 (&(&ei->i_raw_lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: ext4_do_update_inode+0xaa/0xf60 [ext4] irq event stamp: 3009267 hardirqs last enabled at (3009267): [<ffffffff980da9b7>] __find_get_block+0x107/0x790 hardirqs last disabled at (3009266): [<ffffffff980da8f9>] __find_get_block+0x49/0x790 softirqs last enabled at (3009230): [<ffffffff98a0034c>] __do_softirq+0x34c/0x57c softirqs last disabled at (3009223): [<ffffffff97cc67a2>] irq_exit+0xa2/0xc0 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 65 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u256:0 Tainted: G L 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200221+ #7 Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019 Workqueue: ext4-rsv-conversion ext4_end_io_rsv_work [ext4] The plain read is outside of inode->i_lock critical section which results in a data race. Fix it by adding READ_ONCE() there. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200222043258.2279-1-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
[ Upstream commit 351cbf6 ] Zygo reported the following lockdep splat while testing the balance patches ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.6.0-c6f0579d496a+ #53 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/1133 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888092f622c0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8fc5f860 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.91+0x29/0x30 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x19/0x20 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x32/0x740 add_block_entry+0x45/0x260 btrfs_ref_tree_mod+0x6e2/0x8b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x789/0x880 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0xc6/0xf0 __btrfs_cow_block+0x270/0x940 btrfs_cow_block+0x1ba/0x3a0 btrfs_search_slot+0x999/0x1030 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x81/0xe0 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x128/0x7d0 __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0xf4/0x2a0 btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13/0x20 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x5cc/0x1390 insert_balance_item.isra.39+0x6b2/0x6e0 btrfs_balance+0x72d/0x18d0 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3de/0x4c0 btrfs_ioctl+0x30ab/0x44a0 ksys_ioctl+0xa1/0xe0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x77/0x2c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}: __lock_acquire+0x197e/0x2550 lock_acquire+0x103/0x220 __mutex_lock+0x13d/0xce0 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x49/0x50 btrfs_evict_inode+0x6fc/0x900 evict+0x19a/0x2c0 dispose_list+0xa0/0xe0 prune_icache_sb+0xbd/0xf0 super_cache_scan+0x1b5/0x250 do_shrink_slab+0x1f6/0x530 shrink_slab+0x32e/0x410 shrink_node+0x2a5/0xba0 balance_pgdat+0x4bd/0x8a0 kswapd+0x35a/0x800 kthread+0x1e9/0x210 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/1133: #0: ffffffff8fc5f860 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff8fc380d8 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}, at: shrink_slab+0x1e8/0x410 #2: ffff8881e0e6c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#42){++++}, at: trylock_super+0x1b/0x70 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 1133 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.6.0-c6f0579d496a+ #53 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xc1/0x11a print_circular_bug.isra.38.cold.57+0x145/0x14a check_noncircular+0x2a9/0x2f0 ? print_circular_bug.isra.38+0x130/0x130 ? stack_trace_consume_entry+0x90/0x90 ? save_trace+0x3cc/0x420 __lock_acquire+0x197e/0x2550 ? btrfs_inode_clear_file_extent_range+0x9b/0xb0 ? register_lock_class+0x960/0x960 lock_acquire+0x103/0x220 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 __mutex_lock+0x13d/0xce0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 ? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20 ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0xeb/0x190 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0xc20/0xc20 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? check_chain_key+0x1e6/0x2e0 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x49/0x50 btrfs_evict_inode+0x6fc/0x900 ? btrfs_setattr+0x840/0x840 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140 evict+0x19a/0x2c0 dispose_list+0xa0/0xe0 prune_icache_sb+0xbd/0xf0 ? invalidate_inodes+0x310/0x310 super_cache_scan+0x1b5/0x250 do_shrink_slab+0x1f6/0x530 shrink_slab+0x32e/0x410 ? do_shrink_slab+0x530/0x530 ? do_shrink_slab+0x530/0x530 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? mem_cgroup_protected+0x13d/0x260 shrink_node+0x2a5/0xba0 balance_pgdat+0x4bd/0x8a0 ? mem_cgroup_shrink_node+0x490/0x490 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x40 ? finish_task_switch+0xce/0x390 ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0 kswapd+0x35a/0x800 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4c/0x60 ? balance_pgdat+0x8a0/0x8a0 ? finish_wait+0x110/0x110 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? __kthread_parkme+0xc6/0xe0 ? balance_pgdat+0x8a0/0x8a0 kthread+0x1e9/0x210 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 This is because we hold that delayed node's mutex while doing tree operations. Fix this by just wrapping the searches in nofs. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
[ Upstream commit a866759 ] This reverts commit 64e62bd. This commit ends up causing some lockdep splats due to trying to grab the payload lock while holding the mgr's lock: [ 54.010099] [ 54.011765] ====================================================== [ 54.018670] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 54.025577] 5.5.0-rc6-02274-g77381c23ee63 #47 Not tainted [ 54.031610] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 54.038516] kworker/1:6/1040 is trying to acquire lock: [ 54.044354] ffff888272af3228 (&mgr->payload_lock){+.+.}, at: drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.054957] [ 54.054957] but task is already holding lock: [ 54.061473] ffff888272af3060 (&mgr->lock){+.+.}, at: drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x3c/0x2e4 [ 54.071193] [ 54.071193] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 54.071193] [ 54.080334] [ 54.080334] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 54.088697] [ 54.088697] -> #1 (&mgr->lock){+.+.}: [ 54.094440] __mutex_lock+0xc3/0x498 [ 54.099015] drm_dp_mst_topology_get_port_validated+0x25/0x80 [ 54.106018] drm_dp_update_payload_part1+0xa2/0x2e2 [ 54.112051] intel_mst_pre_enable_dp+0x144/0x18f [ 54.117791] intel_encoders_pre_enable+0x63/0x70 [ 54.123532] hsw_crtc_enable+0xa1/0x722 [ 54.128396] intel_update_crtc+0x50/0x194 [ 54.133455] skl_commit_modeset_enables+0x40c/0x540 [ 54.139485] intel_atomic_commit_tail+0x5f7/0x130d [ 54.145418] intel_atomic_commit+0x2c8/0x2d8 [ 54.150770] drm_atomic_helper_set_config+0x5a/0x70 [ 54.156801] drm_mode_setcrtc+0x2ab/0x833 [ 54.161862] drm_ioctl+0x2e5/0x424 [ 54.166242] vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x2f [ 54.170426] do_vfs_ioctl+0x5fb/0x61e [ 54.175096] ksys_ioctl+0x55/0x75 [ 54.179377] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x1a/0x1e [ 54.184146] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0x6d [ 54.188721] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 54.194946] [ 54.194946] -> #0 (&mgr->payload_lock){+.+.}: [ 54.201463] [ 54.201463] other info that might help us debug this: [ 54.201463] [ 54.210410] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 54.210410] [ 54.217025] CPU0 CPU1 [ 54.222082] ---- ---- [ 54.227138] lock(&mgr->lock); [ 54.230643] lock(&mgr->payload_lock); [ 54.237742] lock(&mgr->lock); [ 54.244062] lock(&mgr->payload_lock); [ 54.248346] [ 54.248346] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 54.248346] [ 54.254959] 7 locks held by kworker/1:6/1040: [ 54.259822] #0: ffff888275c4f528 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}, at: worker_thread+0x455/0x6e2 [ 54.269451] #1: ffffc9000119beb0 ((work_completion)(&(&dev_priv->hotplug.hotplug_work)->work)){+.+.}, at: worker_thread+0x455/0x6e2 [ 54.282768] #2: ffff888272a403f0 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}, at: i915_hotplug_work_func+0x4b/0x2be [ 54.293368] #3: ffffffff824fc6c0 (drm_connector_list_iter){.+.+}, at: i915_hotplug_work_func+0x17e/0x2be [ 54.304061] #4: ffffc9000119bc58 (crtc_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}, at: drm_helper_probe_detect_ctx+0x40/0xfd [ 54.314855] #5: ffff888272a40470 (crtc_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}, at: drm_modeset_lock+0x74/0xe2 [ 54.324385] #6: ffff888272af3060 (&mgr->lock){+.+.}, at: drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x3c/0x2e4 [ 54.334597] [ 54.334597] stack backtrace: [ 54.339464] CPU: 1 PID: 1040 Comm: kworker/1:6 Not tainted 5.5.0-rc6-02274-g77381c23ee63 #47 [ 54.348893] Hardware name: Google Fizz/Fizz, BIOS Google_Fizz.10139.39.0 01/04/2018 [ 54.357451] Workqueue: events i915_hotplug_work_func [ 54.362995] Call Trace: [ 54.365724] dump_stack+0x71/0x9c [ 54.369427] check_noncircular+0x91/0xbc [ 54.373809] ? __lock_acquire+0xc9e/0xf66 [ 54.378286] ? __lock_acquire+0xc9e/0xf66 [ 54.382763] ? lock_acquire+0x175/0x1ac [ 54.387048] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.393177] ? __mutex_lock+0xc3/0x498 [ 54.397362] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.403492] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.409620] ? drm_dp_dpcd_access+0xd9/0x101 [ 54.414390] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.420517] ? drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_set_mst+0x218/0x2e4 [ 54.426645] ? intel_digital_port_connected+0x34d/0x35c [ 54.432482] ? intel_dp_detect+0x227/0x44e [ 54.437056] ? ww_mutex_lock+0x49/0x9a [ 54.441242] ? drm_helper_probe_detect_ctx+0x75/0xfd [ 54.446789] ? intel_encoder_hotplug+0x4b/0x97 [ 54.451752] ? intel_ddi_hotplug+0x61/0x2e0 [ 54.456423] ? mark_held_locks+0x53/0x68 [ 54.460803] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x3a/0x51 [ 54.466347] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x187/0x1a4 [ 54.471310] ? drm_connector_list_iter_next+0x89/0x9a [ 54.476953] ? i915_hotplug_work_func+0x206/0x2be [ 54.482208] ? worker_thread+0x4d5/0x6e2 [ 54.486587] ? worker_thread+0x455/0x6e2 [ 54.490966] ? queue_work_on+0x64/0x64 [ 54.495151] ? kthread+0x1e9/0x1f1 [ 54.498946] ? queue_work_on+0x64/0x64 [ 54.503130] ? kthread_unpark+0x5e/0x5e [ 54.507413] ? ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 The proper fix for this is probably cleanup the VCPI allocations when we're enabling the topology, or on the first payload allocation. For now though, let's just revert. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Fixes: 64e62bd ("drm/dp_mst: Remove VCPI while disabling topology mgr") Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run> Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117205149.97262-1-lyude@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
[ Upstream commit 696ac2e ] Similar to commit 0266d81 ("acpi/processor: Prevent cpu hotplug deadlock") except this is for acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe(): "The problem is that the work is scheduled on the current CPU from the hotplug thread associated with that CPU. It's not required to invoke these functions via the workqueue because the hotplug thread runs on the target CPU already. Check whether current is a per cpu thread pinned on the target CPU and invoke the function directly to avoid the workqueue." WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected ------------------------------------------------------ cpuhp/1/15 is trying to acquire lock: ffffc90003447a28 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x4c6/0x630 but task is already holding lock: ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: cpus_read_lock+0x3e/0xc0 irq_calc_affinity_vectors+0x5f/0x91 __pci_enable_msix_range+0x10f/0x9a0 pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity+0x13e/0x1f0 pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity at drivers/pci/msi.c:1208 pqi_ctrl_init+0x72f/0x1618 [smartpqi] pqi_pci_probe.cold.63+0x882/0x892 [smartpqi] local_pci_probe+0x7a/0xc0 work_for_cpu_fn+0x2e/0x50 process_one_work+0x57e/0xb90 worker_thread+0x363/0x5b0 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0 lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680 __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630 work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160 acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250 acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580 acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740 acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140 acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0 smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&wfc.work) --> cpuhp_state-up --> cpuidle_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(cpuidle_lock); lock(cpuhp_state-up); lock(cpuidle_lock); lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work)); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by cpuhp/1/15: #0: ffffffffaf51ab10 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0 #1: ffffffffaf51ad40 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0 #2: ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xa0/0xea print_circular_bug.cold.52+0x147/0x14c check_noncircular+0x295/0x2d0 __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0 lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680 __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630 work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160 acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250 acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580 acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740 acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140 acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0 smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> [ rjw: Subject ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
commit d3ec10a upstream. A lockdep circular locking dependency report was seen when running a keyutils test: [12537.027242] ====================================================== [12537.059309] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [12537.088148] 4.18.0-147.7.1.el8_1.x86_64+debug #1 Tainted: G OE --------- - - [12537.125253] ------------------------------------------------------ [12537.153189] keyctl/25598 is trying to acquire lock: [12537.175087] 000000007c39f96c (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12537.208365] [12537.208365] but task is already holding lock: [12537.234507] 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220 [12537.270476] [12537.270476] which lock already depends on the new lock. [12537.270476] [12537.307209] [12537.307209] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [12537.340754] [12537.340754] -> #3 (&type->lock_class){++++}: [12537.367434] down_write+0x4d/0x110 [12537.385202] __key_link_begin+0x87/0x280 [12537.405232] request_key_and_link+0x483/0xf70 [12537.427221] request_key+0x3c/0x80 [12537.444839] dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver] [12537.468445] dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs] [12537.496731] cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs] [12537.519418] cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs] [12537.546263] cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs] [12537.573551] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs] [12537.601045] kthread+0x30c/0x3d0 [12537.617906] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [12537.636225] [12537.636225] -> #2 (root_key_user.cons_lock){+.+.}: [12537.664525] __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0 [12537.683734] request_key_and_link+0x35a/0xf70 [12537.705640] request_key+0x3c/0x80 [12537.723304] dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver] [12537.746773] dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs] [12537.775607] cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs] [12537.798322] cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs] [12537.823369] cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs] [12537.847262] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs] [12537.873477] kthread+0x30c/0x3d0 [12537.890281] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [12537.908649] [12537.908649] -> #1 (&tcp_ses->srv_mutex){+.+.}: [12537.935225] __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0 [12537.954450] cifs_call_async+0x102/0x7f0 [cifs] [12537.977250] smb2_async_readv+0x6c3/0xc90 [cifs] [12538.000659] cifs_readpages+0x120a/0x1e50 [cifs] [12538.023920] read_pages+0xf5/0x560 [12538.041583] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x41d/0x4b0 [12538.067047] ondemand_readahead+0x44c/0xc10 [12538.092069] filemap_fault+0xec1/0x1830 [12538.111637] __do_fault+0x82/0x260 [12538.129216] do_fault+0x419/0xfb0 [12538.146390] __handle_mm_fault+0x862/0xdf0 [12538.167408] handle_mm_fault+0x154/0x550 [12538.187401] __do_page_fault+0x42f/0xa60 [12538.207395] do_page_fault+0x38/0x5e0 [12538.225777] page_fault+0x1e/0x30 [12538.243010] [12538.243010] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: [12538.267875] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420 [12538.286848] __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0 [12538.306006] keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170 [12538.327936] assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280 [12538.352154] keyring_read+0xe9/0x110 [12538.370558] keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220 [12538.391470] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0 [12538.410511] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf [12538.435535] [12538.435535] other info that might help us debug this: [12538.435535] [12538.472829] Chain exists of: [12538.472829] &mm->mmap_sem --> root_key_user.cons_lock --> &type->lock_class [12538.472829] [12538.524820] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [12538.524820] [12538.551431] CPU0 CPU1 [12538.572654] ---- ---- [12538.595865] lock(&type->lock_class); [12538.613737] lock(root_key_user.cons_lock); [12538.644234] lock(&type->lock_class); [12538.672410] lock(&mm->mmap_sem); [12538.687758] [12538.687758] *** DEADLOCK *** [12538.687758] [12538.714455] 1 lock held by keyctl/25598: [12538.732097] #0: 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220 [12538.770573] [12538.770573] stack backtrace: [12538.790136] CPU: 2 PID: 25598 Comm: keyctl Kdump: loaded Tainted: G [12538.844855] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9/ProLiant DL360 Gen9, BIOS P89 12/27/2015 [12538.881963] Call Trace: [12538.892897] dump_stack+0x9a/0xf0 [12538.907908] print_circular_bug.isra.25.cold.50+0x1bc/0x279 [12538.932891] ? save_trace+0xd6/0x250 [12538.948979] check_prev_add.constprop.32+0xc36/0x14f0 [12538.971643] ? keyring_compare_object+0x104/0x190 [12538.992738] ? check_usage+0x550/0x550 [12539.009845] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 [12539.025484] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x1e0 [12539.043555] __lock_acquire+0x1f12/0x38d0 [12539.061551] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x10/0x10 [12539.080554] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420 [12539.100330] ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12539.119079] __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0 [12539.135869] ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12539.153234] keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170 [12539.172787] ? keyring_read+0x110/0x110 [12539.190059] assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280 [12539.211526] keyring_read+0xe9/0x110 [12539.227561] ? keyring_gc_check_iterator+0xc0/0xc0 [12539.249076] keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220 [12539.266660] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0 [12539.283091] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf One way to prevent this deadlock scenario from happening is to not allow writing to userspace while holding the key semaphore. Instead, an internal buffer is allocated for getting the keys out from the read method first before copying them out to userspace without holding the lock. That requires taking out the __user modifier from all the relevant read methods as well as additional changes to not use any userspace write helpers. That is, 1) The put_user() call is replaced by a direct copy. 2) The copy_to_user() call is replaced by memcpy(). 3) All the fault handling code is removed. Compiling on a x86-64 system, the size of the rxrpc_read() function is reduced from 3795 bytes to 2384 bytes with this patch. Fixes: ^1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
commit 056ad39 upstream. FuzzUSB (a variant of syzkaller) found a free-while-still-in-use bug in the USB scatter-gather library: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in atomic_read include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:26 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in usb_hcd_unlink_urb+0x5f/0x170 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1607 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888065379610 by task kworker/u4:1/27 CPU: 1 PID: 27 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Not tainted 5.5.11 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: scsi_tmf_2 scmd_eh_abort_handler Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0xce/0x128 lib/dump_stack.c:118 print_address_description.constprop.4+0x21/0x3c0 mm/kasan/report.c:374 __kasan_report+0x153/0x1cb mm/kasan/report.c:506 kasan_report+0x12/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:639 check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:185 [inline] check_memory_region+0x152/0x1b0 mm/kasan/generic.c:192 __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:95 atomic_read include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:26 [inline] usb_hcd_unlink_urb+0x5f/0x170 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1607 usb_unlink_urb+0x72/0xb0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:657 usb_sg_cancel+0x14e/0x290 drivers/usb/core/message.c:602 usb_stor_stop_transport+0x5e/0xa0 drivers/usb/storage/transport.c:937 This bug occurs when cancellation of the S-G transfer races with transfer completion. When that happens, usb_sg_cancel() may continue to access the transfer's URBs after usb_sg_wait() has freed them. The bug is caused by the fact that usb_sg_cancel() does not take any sort of reference to the transfer, and so there is nothing to prevent the URBs from being deallocated while the routine is trying to use them. The fix is to take such a reference by incrementing the transfer's io->count field while the cancellation is in progres and decrementing it afterward. The transfer's URBs are not deallocated until io->complete is triggered, which happens when io->count reaches zero. Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Reported-and-tested-by: Kyungtae Kim <kt0755@gmail.com> CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Pine.LNX.4.44L0.2003281615140.14837-100000@netrider.rowland.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
…f fs_info::journal_info commit fcc9973 upstream. [BUG] One run of btrfs/063 triggered the following lockdep warning: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 5.6.0-rc7-custom+ #48 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- kworker/u24:0/7 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] but task is already holding lock: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(sb_internal#2); lock(sb_internal#2); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by kworker/u24:0/7: #0: ffff88817b495948 ((wq_completion)btrfs-endio-write){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80 #1: ffff888189ea7db8 ((work_completion)(&work->normal_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x557/0xb80 #2: ffff88817d3a46e0 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}, at: start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] #3: ffff888174ca4da8 (&fs_info->reloc_mutex){+.+.}, at: btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x83/0xd0 [btrfs] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 7 Comm: kworker/u24:0 Not tainted 5.6.0-rc7-custom+ #48 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] Call Trace: dump_stack+0xc2/0x11a __lock_acquire.cold+0xce/0x214 lock_acquire+0xe6/0x210 __sb_start_write+0x14e/0x290 start_transaction+0x66c/0x890 [btrfs] btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs] find_free_extent+0x1504/0x1a50 [btrfs] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xd5/0x1f0 [btrfs] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x1ac/0x570 [btrfs] btrfs_copy_root+0x213/0x580 [btrfs] create_reloc_root+0x3bd/0x470 [btrfs] btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2d2/0x310 [btrfs] record_root_in_trans+0x191/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x90/0xd0 [btrfs] start_transaction+0x16e/0x890 [btrfs] btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x55d/0xcd0 [btrfs] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0x116/0x9a0 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x632/0xb80 worker_thread+0x80/0x690 kthread+0x1a3/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 It's pretty hard to reproduce, only one hit so far. [CAUSE] This is because we're calling btrfs_join_transaction() without re-using the current running one: btrfs_finish_ordered_io() |- btrfs_join_transaction() <<< Call #1 |- btrfs_record_root_in_trans() |- btrfs_reserve_extent() |- btrfs_join_transaction() <<< Call #2 Normally such btrfs_join_transaction() call should re-use the existing one, without trying to re-start a transaction. But the problem is, in btrfs_join_transaction() call #1, we call btrfs_record_root_in_trans() before initializing current::journal_info. And in btrfs_join_transaction() call #2, we're relying on current::journal_info to avoid such deadlock. [FIX] Call btrfs_record_root_in_trans() after we have initialized current::journal_info. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
…dency [ Upstream commit 7809f70 ] On a very heavily loaded D05 with GICv4, I managed to trigger the following lockdep splat: [ 6022.598864] ====================================================== [ 6022.605031] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 6022.611200] 5.6.0-rc4-00026-geee7c7b0f498 #680 Tainted: G E [ 6022.618061] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 6022.624227] qemu-system-aar/7569 is trying to acquire lock: [ 6022.629789] ffff042f97606808 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}, at: try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0 [ 6022.637102] [ 6022.637102] but task is already holding lock: [ 6022.642921] ffff002fae424cf0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98 [ 6022.651350] [ 6022.651350] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 6022.651350] [ 6022.659512] [ 6022.659512] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 6022.666980] [ 6022.666980] -> #2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}: [ 6022.672983] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78 [ 6022.677848] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98 [ 6022.682453] irq_set_vcpu_affinity+0x40/0xc0 [ 6022.687236] its_make_vpe_non_resident+0x6c/0xb8 [ 6022.692364] vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70 [ 6022.696273] vgic_v3_put+0x20/0xd8 [ 6022.700183] kvm_vgic_put+0x30/0x48 [ 6022.704182] kvm_arch_vcpu_put+0x34/0x50 [ 6022.708614] kvm_sched_out+0x34/0x50 [ 6022.712700] __schedule+0x4bc/0x7f8 [ 6022.716697] schedule+0x50/0xd8 [ 6022.720347] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x5f0/0x978 [ 6022.725473] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8 [ 6022.729820] ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0 [ 6022.733642] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.738074] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8 [ 6022.743373] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6022.747198] el0_svc+0x14/0x40 [ 6022.750761] el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8 [ 6022.755278] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6022.759100] [ 6022.759100] -> #1 (&rq->lock){-.-.}: [ 6022.764143] _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50 [ 6022.768314] task_fork_fair+0x40/0x128 [ 6022.772572] sched_fork+0xe0/0x210 [ 6022.776484] copy_process+0x8c4/0x18d8 [ 6022.780742] _do_fork+0x88/0x6d8 [ 6022.784478] kernel_thread+0x64/0x88 [ 6022.788563] rest_init+0x30/0x270 [ 6022.792390] arch_call_rest_init+0x14/0x1c [ 6022.796995] start_kernel+0x498/0x4c4 [ 6022.801164] [ 6022.801164] -> #0 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}: [ 6022.806382] __lock_acquire+0xdd8/0x15c8 [ 6022.810813] lock_acquire+0xd0/0x218 [ 6022.814896] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78 [ 6022.819761] try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0 [ 6022.824018] wake_up_process+0x1c/0x28 [ 6022.828276] wakeup_softirqd+0x38/0x40 [ 6022.832533] __tasklet_schedule_common+0xc4/0xf0 [ 6022.837658] __tasklet_schedule+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.842176] check_irq_resend+0xc8/0x158 [ 6022.846609] irq_startup+0x74/0x128 [ 6022.850606] __enable_irq+0x6c/0x78 [ 6022.854602] enable_irq+0x54/0xa0 [ 6022.858431] its_make_vpe_non_resident+0xa4/0xb8 [ 6022.863557] vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70 [ 6022.867469] kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking+0x28/0x38 [ 6022.872336] kvm_vcpu_block+0x48/0x490 [ 6022.876594] kvm_handle_wfx+0x18c/0x310 [ 6022.880938] handle_exit+0x138/0x198 [ 6022.885022] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x4d4/0x978 [ 6022.890148] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8 [ 6022.894494] ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0 [ 6022.898317] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.902748] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8 [ 6022.908046] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6022.911871] el0_svc+0x14/0x40 [ 6022.915434] el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8 [ 6022.919951] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6022.923773] [ 6022.923773] other info that might help us debug this: [ 6022.923773] [ 6022.931762] Chain exists of: [ 6022.931762] &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock --> &irq_desc_lock_class [ 6022.931762] [ 6022.942101] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 6022.942101] [ 6022.948007] CPU0 CPU1 [ 6022.952523] ---- ---- [ 6022.957039] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); [ 6022.961036] lock(&rq->lock); [ 6022.966595] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); [ 6022.973109] lock(&p->pi_lock); [ 6022.976324] [ 6022.976324] *** DEADLOCK *** This is happening because we have a pending doorbell that requires retrigger. As SW retriggering is done in a tasklet, we trigger the circular dependency above. The easy cop-out is to provide a retrigger callback that doesn't require acquiring any extra lock. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200310184921.23552-5-maz@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
commit 28936b6 upstream. inode->i_blocks could be accessed concurrently as noticed by KCSAN, BUG: KCSAN: data-race in ext4_do_update_inode [ext4] / inode_add_bytes write to 0xffff9a00d4b982d0 of 8 bytes by task 22100 on cpu 118: inode_add_bytes+0x65/0xf0 __inode_add_bytes at fs/stat.c:689 (inlined by) inode_add_bytes at fs/stat.c:702 ext4_mb_new_blocks+0x418/0xca0 [ext4] ext4_ext_map_blocks+0x1a6b/0x27b0 [ext4] ext4_map_blocks+0x1a9/0x950 [ext4] _ext4_get_block+0xfc/0x270 [ext4] ext4_get_block_unwritten+0x33/0x50 [ext4] __block_write_begin_int+0x22e/0xae0 __block_write_begin+0x39/0x50 ext4_write_begin+0x388/0xb50 [ext4] ext4_da_write_begin+0x35f/0x8f0 [ext4] generic_perform_write+0x15d/0x290 ext4_buffered_write_iter+0x11f/0x210 [ext4] ext4_file_write_iter+0xce/0x9e0 [ext4] new_sync_write+0x29c/0x3b0 __vfs_write+0x92/0xa0 vfs_write+0x103/0x260 ksys_write+0x9d/0x130 __x64_sys_write+0x4c/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x91/0xb05 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe read to 0xffff9a00d4b982d0 of 8 bytes by task 8 on cpu 65: ext4_do_update_inode+0x4a0/0xf60 [ext4] ext4_inode_blocks_set at fs/ext4/inode.c:4815 ext4_mark_iloc_dirty+0xaf/0x160 [ext4] ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x129/0x3e0 [ext4] ext4_convert_unwritten_extents+0x253/0x2d0 [ext4] ext4_convert_unwritten_io_end_vec+0xc5/0x150 [ext4] ext4_end_io_rsv_work+0x22c/0x350 [ext4] process_one_work+0x54f/0xb90 worker_thread+0x80/0x5f0 kthread+0x1cd/0x1f0 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 4 locks held by kworker/u256:0/8: #0: ffff9a025abc4328 ((wq_completion)ext4-rsv-conversion){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0xb90 #1: ffffab5a862dbe20 ((work_completion)(&ei->i_rsv_conversion_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x443/0xb90 #2: ffff9a025a9d0f58 (jbd2_handle){++++}, at: start_this_handle+0x1c1/0x9d0 [jbd2] #3: ffff9a00d4b985d8 (&(&ei->i_raw_lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: ext4_do_update_inode+0xaa/0xf60 [ext4] irq event stamp: 3009267 hardirqs last enabled at (3009267): [<ffffffff980da9b7>] __find_get_block+0x107/0x790 hardirqs last disabled at (3009266): [<ffffffff980da8f9>] __find_get_block+0x49/0x790 softirqs last enabled at (3009230): [<ffffffff98a0034c>] __do_softirq+0x34c/0x57c softirqs last disabled at (3009223): [<ffffffff97cc67a2>] irq_exit+0xa2/0xc0 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 65 PID: 8 Comm: kworker/u256:0 Tainted: G L 5.6.0-rc2-next-20200221+ #7 Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL385 Gen10/ProLiant DL385 Gen10, BIOS A40 07/10/2019 Workqueue: ext4-rsv-conversion ext4_end_io_rsv_work [ext4] The plain read is outside of inode->i_lock critical section which results in a data race. Fix it by adding READ_ONCE() there. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200222043258.2279-1-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
[ Upstream commit f0cc2cd ] During unmount we can have a job from the delayed inode items work queue still running, that can lead to at least two bad things: 1) A crash, because the worker can try to create a transaction just after the fs roots were freed; 2) A transaction leak, because the worker can create a transaction before the fs roots are freed and just after we committed the last transaction and after we stopped the transaction kthread. A stack trace example of the crash: [79011.691214] kernel BUG at lib/radix-tree.c:982! [79011.692056] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI [79011.693180] CPU: 3 PID: 1394 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Tainted: G W 5.6.0-rc2-btrfs-next-54 #2 (...) [79011.696789] Workqueue: btrfs-delayed-meta btrfs_work_helper [btrfs] [79011.697904] RIP: 0010:radix_tree_tag_set+0xe7/0x170 (...) [79011.702014] RSP: 0018:ffffb3c84a317ca0 EFLAGS: 00010293 [79011.702949] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [79011.704202] RDX: ffffb3c84a317cb0 RSI: ffffb3c84a317ca8 RDI: ffff8db3931340a0 [79011.705463] RBP: 0000000000000005 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: ffffffff974629d0 [79011.706756] R10: ffffb3c84a317bc0 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8db393134000 [79011.708010] R13: ffff8db3931340a0 R14: ffff8db393134068 R15: 0000000000000001 [79011.709270] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8db3b6a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [79011.710699] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [79011.711710] CR2: 00007f22c2a0a000 CR3: 0000000232ad4005 CR4: 00000000003606e0 [79011.712958] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [79011.714205] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [79011.715448] Call Trace: [79011.715925] record_root_in_trans+0x72/0xf0 [btrfs] [79011.716819] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x4b/0x70 [btrfs] [79011.717925] start_transaction+0xdd/0x5c0 [btrfs] [79011.718829] btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x17e/0x2b0 [btrfs] [79011.719915] btrfs_work_helper+0xaa/0x720 [btrfs] [79011.720773] process_one_work+0x26d/0x6a0 [79011.721497] worker_thread+0x4f/0x3e0 [79011.722153] ? process_one_work+0x6a0/0x6a0 [79011.722901] kthread+0x103/0x140 [79011.723481] ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 [79011.724379] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 (...) The following diagram shows a sequence of steps that lead to the crash during ummount of the filesystem: CPU 1 CPU 2 CPU 3 btrfs_punch_hole() btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() btrfs_balance_delayed_items() --> sees fs_info->delayed_root->items with value 200, which is greater than BTRFS_DELAYED_BACKGROUND (128) and smaller than BTRFS_DELAYED_WRITEBACK (512) btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node() --> queues a job for fs_info->delayed_workers to run btrfs_async_run_delayed_root() btrfs_async_run_delayed_root() --> job queued by CPU 1 --> starts picking and running delayed nodes from the prepare_list list close_ctree() btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() btrfs_commit_super() btrfs_join_transaction() --> gets transaction N btrfs_commit_transaction(N) --> set transaction state to TRANTS_STATE_COMMIT_START btrfs_first_prepared_delayed_node() --> picks delayed node X through the prepared_list list btrfs_run_delayed_items() btrfs_first_delayed_node() --> also picks delayed node X but through the node_list list __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items() --> runs all delayed items from this node and drops the node's item count to 0 through call to btrfs_release_delayed_inode() --> finishes running any remaining delayed nodes --> finishes transaction commit --> stops cleaner and transaction threads btrfs_free_fs_roots() --> frees all roots and removes them from the radix tree fs_info->fs_roots_radix btrfs_join_transaction() start_transaction() btrfs_record_root_in_trans() record_root_in_trans() radix_tree_tag_set() --> crashes because the root is not in the radix tree anymore If the worker is able to call btrfs_join_transaction() before the unmount task frees the fs roots, we end up leaking a transaction and all its resources, since after the call to btrfs_commit_super() and stopping the transaction kthread, we don't expect to have any transaction open anymore. When this situation happens the worker has a delayed node that has no more items to run, since the task calling btrfs_run_delayed_items(), which is doing a transaction commit, picks the same node and runs all its items first. We can not wait for the worker to complete when running delayed items through btrfs_run_delayed_items(), because we call that function in several phases of a transaction commit, and that could cause a deadlock because the worker calls btrfs_join_transaction() and the task doing the transaction commit may have already set the transaction state to TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_DOING. Also it's not possible to get into a situation where only some of the items of a delayed node are added to the fs/subvolume tree in the current transaction and the remaining ones in the next transaction, because when running the items of a delayed inode we lock its mutex, effectively waiting for the worker if the worker is running the items of the delayed node already. Since this can only cause issues when unmounting a filesystem, fix it in a simple way by waiting for any jobs on the delayed workers queue before calling btrfs_commit_supper() at close_ctree(). This works because at this point no one can call btrfs_btree_balance_dirty() or btrfs_balance_delayed_items(), and if we end up waiting for any worker to complete, btrfs_commit_super() will commit the transaction created by the worker. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
[ Upstream commit 351cbf6 ] Zygo reported the following lockdep splat while testing the balance patches ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.6.0-c6f0579d496a+ #53 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/1133 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888092f622c0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8fc5f860 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}: fs_reclaim_acquire.part.91+0x29/0x30 fs_reclaim_acquire+0x19/0x20 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x32/0x740 add_block_entry+0x45/0x260 btrfs_ref_tree_mod+0x6e2/0x8b0 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x789/0x880 alloc_tree_block_no_bg_flush+0xc6/0xf0 __btrfs_cow_block+0x270/0x940 btrfs_cow_block+0x1ba/0x3a0 btrfs_search_slot+0x999/0x1030 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x81/0xe0 btrfs_insert_delayed_items+0x128/0x7d0 __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0xf4/0x2a0 btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13/0x20 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x5cc/0x1390 insert_balance_item.isra.39+0x6b2/0x6e0 btrfs_balance+0x72d/0x18d0 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x3de/0x4c0 btrfs_ioctl+0x30ab/0x44a0 ksys_ioctl+0xa1/0xe0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x77/0x2c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}: __lock_acquire+0x197e/0x2550 lock_acquire+0x103/0x220 __mutex_lock+0x13d/0xce0 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x49/0x50 btrfs_evict_inode+0x6fc/0x900 evict+0x19a/0x2c0 dispose_list+0xa0/0xe0 prune_icache_sb+0xbd/0xf0 super_cache_scan+0x1b5/0x250 do_shrink_slab+0x1f6/0x530 shrink_slab+0x32e/0x410 shrink_node+0x2a5/0xba0 balance_pgdat+0x4bd/0x8a0 kswapd+0x35a/0x800 kthread+0x1e9/0x210 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by kswapd0/1133: #0: ffffffff8fc5f860 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}, at: __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x5/0x30 #1: ffffffff8fc380d8 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}, at: shrink_slab+0x1e8/0x410 #2: ffff8881e0e6c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#42){++++}, at: trylock_super+0x1b/0x70 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 1133 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.6.0-c6f0579d496a+ #53 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.12.0-1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xc1/0x11a print_circular_bug.isra.38.cold.57+0x145/0x14a check_noncircular+0x2a9/0x2f0 ? print_circular_bug.isra.38+0x130/0x130 ? stack_trace_consume_entry+0x90/0x90 ? save_trace+0x3cc/0x420 __lock_acquire+0x197e/0x2550 ? btrfs_inode_clear_file_extent_range+0x9b/0xb0 ? register_lock_class+0x960/0x960 lock_acquire+0x103/0x220 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 __mutex_lock+0x13d/0xce0 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 ? __asan_loadN+0xf/0x20 ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0xeb/0x190 ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 ? mutex_lock_io_nested+0xc20/0xc20 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? check_chain_key+0x1e6/0x2e0 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x7c/0x5b0 btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x49/0x50 btrfs_evict_inode+0x6fc/0x900 ? btrfs_setattr+0x840/0x840 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0xa8/0x140 evict+0x19a/0x2c0 dispose_list+0xa0/0xe0 prune_icache_sb+0xbd/0xf0 ? invalidate_inodes+0x310/0x310 super_cache_scan+0x1b5/0x250 do_shrink_slab+0x1f6/0x530 shrink_slab+0x32e/0x410 ? do_shrink_slab+0x530/0x530 ? do_shrink_slab+0x530/0x530 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? mem_cgroup_protected+0x13d/0x260 shrink_node+0x2a5/0xba0 balance_pgdat+0x4bd/0x8a0 ? mem_cgroup_shrink_node+0x490/0x490 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x40 ? finish_task_switch+0xce/0x390 ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0 kswapd+0x35a/0x800 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4c/0x60 ? balance_pgdat+0x8a0/0x8a0 ? finish_wait+0x110/0x110 ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 ? __kthread_parkme+0xc6/0xe0 ? balance_pgdat+0x8a0/0x8a0 kthread+0x1e9/0x210 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0xc0/0xc0 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 This is because we hold that delayed node's mutex while doing tree operations. Fix this by just wrapping the searches in nofs. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
[ Upstream commit 696ac2e ] Similar to commit 0266d81 ("acpi/processor: Prevent cpu hotplug deadlock") except this is for acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe(): "The problem is that the work is scheduled on the current CPU from the hotplug thread associated with that CPU. It's not required to invoke these functions via the workqueue because the hotplug thread runs on the target CPU already. Check whether current is a per cpu thread pinned on the target CPU and invoke the function directly to avoid the workqueue." WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected ------------------------------------------------------ cpuhp/1/15 is trying to acquire lock: ffffc90003447a28 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x4c6/0x630 but task is already holding lock: ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: cpus_read_lock+0x3e/0xc0 irq_calc_affinity_vectors+0x5f/0x91 __pci_enable_msix_range+0x10f/0x9a0 pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity+0x13e/0x1f0 pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity at drivers/pci/msi.c:1208 pqi_ctrl_init+0x72f/0x1618 [smartpqi] pqi_pci_probe.cold.63+0x882/0x892 [smartpqi] local_pci_probe+0x7a/0xc0 work_for_cpu_fn+0x2e/0x50 process_one_work+0x57e/0xb90 worker_thread+0x363/0x5b0 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0 lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680 __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630 work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160 acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250 acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580 acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740 acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140 acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0 smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&wfc.work) --> cpuhp_state-up --> cpuidle_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(cpuidle_lock); lock(cpuhp_state-up); lock(cpuidle_lock); lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work)); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by cpuhp/1/15: #0: ffffffffaf51ab10 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0 #1: ffffffffaf51ad40 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: cpuhp_thread_fun+0x69/0x2f0 #2: ffffffffafa1c0e8 (cpuidle_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: cpuidle_pause_and_lock+0x17/0x20 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xa0/0xea print_circular_bug.cold.52+0x147/0x14c check_noncircular+0x295/0x2d0 __lock_acquire+0x2244/0x32a0 lock_acquire+0x1a2/0x680 __flush_work+0x4e6/0x630 work_on_cpu+0x114/0x160 acpi_processor_ffh_cstate_probe+0x129/0x250 acpi_processor_evaluate_cst+0x4c8/0x580 acpi_processor_get_power_info+0x86/0x740 acpi_processor_hotplug+0xc3/0x140 acpi_soft_cpu_online+0x102/0x1d0 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x197/0x1120 cpuhp_thread_fun+0x252/0x2f0 smpboot_thread_fn+0x255/0x440 kthread+0x1f4/0x220 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x50 Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Tested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> [ rjw: Subject ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
commit d3ec10a upstream. A lockdep circular locking dependency report was seen when running a keyutils test: [12537.027242] ====================================================== [12537.059309] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [12537.088148] 4.18.0-147.7.1.el8_1.x86_64+debug #1 Tainted: G OE --------- - - [12537.125253] ------------------------------------------------------ [12537.153189] keyctl/25598 is trying to acquire lock: [12537.175087] 000000007c39f96c (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12537.208365] [12537.208365] but task is already holding lock: [12537.234507] 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220 [12537.270476] [12537.270476] which lock already depends on the new lock. [12537.270476] [12537.307209] [12537.307209] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [12537.340754] [12537.340754] -> #3 (&type->lock_class){++++}: [12537.367434] down_write+0x4d/0x110 [12537.385202] __key_link_begin+0x87/0x280 [12537.405232] request_key_and_link+0x483/0xf70 [12537.427221] request_key+0x3c/0x80 [12537.444839] dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver] [12537.468445] dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs] [12537.496731] cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs] [12537.519418] cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs] [12537.546263] cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs] [12537.573551] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs] [12537.601045] kthread+0x30c/0x3d0 [12537.617906] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [12537.636225] [12537.636225] -> #2 (root_key_user.cons_lock){+.+.}: [12537.664525] __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0 [12537.683734] request_key_and_link+0x35a/0xf70 [12537.705640] request_key+0x3c/0x80 [12537.723304] dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver] [12537.746773] dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs] [12537.775607] cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs] [12537.798322] cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs] [12537.823369] cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs] [12537.847262] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs] [12537.873477] kthread+0x30c/0x3d0 [12537.890281] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [12537.908649] [12537.908649] -> #1 (&tcp_ses->srv_mutex){+.+.}: [12537.935225] __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0 [12537.954450] cifs_call_async+0x102/0x7f0 [cifs] [12537.977250] smb2_async_readv+0x6c3/0xc90 [cifs] [12538.000659] cifs_readpages+0x120a/0x1e50 [cifs] [12538.023920] read_pages+0xf5/0x560 [12538.041583] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x41d/0x4b0 [12538.067047] ondemand_readahead+0x44c/0xc10 [12538.092069] filemap_fault+0xec1/0x1830 [12538.111637] __do_fault+0x82/0x260 [12538.129216] do_fault+0x419/0xfb0 [12538.146390] __handle_mm_fault+0x862/0xdf0 [12538.167408] handle_mm_fault+0x154/0x550 [12538.187401] __do_page_fault+0x42f/0xa60 [12538.207395] do_page_fault+0x38/0x5e0 [12538.225777] page_fault+0x1e/0x30 [12538.243010] [12538.243010] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: [12538.267875] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420 [12538.286848] __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0 [12538.306006] keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170 [12538.327936] assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280 [12538.352154] keyring_read+0xe9/0x110 [12538.370558] keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220 [12538.391470] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0 [12538.410511] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf [12538.435535] [12538.435535] other info that might help us debug this: [12538.435535] [12538.472829] Chain exists of: [12538.472829] &mm->mmap_sem --> root_key_user.cons_lock --> &type->lock_class [12538.472829] [12538.524820] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [12538.524820] [12538.551431] CPU0 CPU1 [12538.572654] ---- ---- [12538.595865] lock(&type->lock_class); [12538.613737] lock(root_key_user.cons_lock); [12538.644234] lock(&type->lock_class); [12538.672410] lock(&mm->mmap_sem); [12538.687758] [12538.687758] *** DEADLOCK *** [12538.687758] [12538.714455] 1 lock held by keyctl/25598: [12538.732097] #0: 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220 [12538.770573] [12538.770573] stack backtrace: [12538.790136] CPU: 2 PID: 25598 Comm: keyctl Kdump: loaded Tainted: G [12538.844855] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9/ProLiant DL360 Gen9, BIOS P89 12/27/2015 [12538.881963] Call Trace: [12538.892897] dump_stack+0x9a/0xf0 [12538.907908] print_circular_bug.isra.25.cold.50+0x1bc/0x279 [12538.932891] ? save_trace+0xd6/0x250 [12538.948979] check_prev_add.constprop.32+0xc36/0x14f0 [12538.971643] ? keyring_compare_object+0x104/0x190 [12538.992738] ? check_usage+0x550/0x550 [12539.009845] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 [12539.025484] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x1e0 [12539.043555] __lock_acquire+0x1f12/0x38d0 [12539.061551] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x10/0x10 [12539.080554] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420 [12539.100330] ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12539.119079] __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0 [12539.135869] ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12539.153234] keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170 [12539.172787] ? keyring_read+0x110/0x110 [12539.190059] assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280 [12539.211526] keyring_read+0xe9/0x110 [12539.227561] ? keyring_gc_check_iterator+0xc0/0xc0 [12539.249076] keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220 [12539.266660] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0 [12539.283091] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf One way to prevent this deadlock scenario from happening is to not allow writing to userspace while holding the key semaphore. Instead, an internal buffer is allocated for getting the keys out from the read method first before copying them out to userspace without holding the lock. That requires taking out the __user modifier from all the relevant read methods as well as additional changes to not use any userspace write helpers. That is, 1) The put_user() call is replaced by a direct copy. 2) The copy_to_user() call is replaced by memcpy(). 3) All the fault handling code is removed. Compiling on a x86-64 system, the size of the rxrpc_read() function is reduced from 3795 bytes to 2384 bytes with this patch. Fixes: ^1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
rn
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 8, 2020
commit 056ad39 upstream. FuzzUSB (a variant of syzkaller) found a free-while-still-in-use bug in the USB scatter-gather library: BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in atomic_read include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:26 [inline] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in usb_hcd_unlink_urb+0x5f/0x170 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1607 Read of size 4 at addr ffff888065379610 by task kworker/u4:1/27 CPU: 1 PID: 27 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Not tainted 5.5.11 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 Workqueue: scsi_tmf_2 scmd_eh_abort_handler Call Trace: __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline] dump_stack+0xce/0x128 lib/dump_stack.c:118 print_address_description.constprop.4+0x21/0x3c0 mm/kasan/report.c:374 __kasan_report+0x153/0x1cb mm/kasan/report.c:506 kasan_report+0x12/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:639 check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:185 [inline] check_memory_region+0x152/0x1b0 mm/kasan/generic.c:192 __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 mm/kasan/common.c:95 atomic_read include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:26 [inline] usb_hcd_unlink_urb+0x5f/0x170 drivers/usb/core/hcd.c:1607 usb_unlink_urb+0x72/0xb0 drivers/usb/core/urb.c:657 usb_sg_cancel+0x14e/0x290 drivers/usb/core/message.c:602 usb_stor_stop_transport+0x5e/0xa0 drivers/usb/storage/transport.c:937 This bug occurs when cancellation of the S-G transfer races with transfer completion. When that happens, usb_sg_cancel() may continue to access the transfer's URBs after usb_sg_wait() has freed them. The bug is caused by the fact that usb_sg_cancel() does not take any sort of reference to the transfer, and so there is nothing to prevent the URBs from being deallocated while the routine is trying to use them. The fix is to take such a reference by incrementing the transfer's io->count field while the cancellation is in progres and decrementing it afterward. The transfer's URBs are not deallocated until io->complete is triggered, which happens when io->count reaches zero. Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Reported-and-tested-by: Kyungtae Kim <kt0755@gmail.com> CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/Pine.LNX.4.44L0.2003281615140.14837-100000@netrider.rowland.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: