Mutate regexps in form /\Astatic/ to String#start_with? #169
Labels
Comments
dgollahon
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 3, 2021
- Adds the following mutations:
* `a.match(/\Atext/)` -> `b.start_with?('text')`
* `a.match?(/\Atext/)` -> `b.start_with?('text')`
* `a =~ /\Atext/` -> `b.start_with?('text')`
- NOTE: Adds a `Mutant::AST::Regexp.expand_regexp_ast` to avoid repeating AST expansion logic in the `send` mutator. At that level, the node appears as a simple `parser` `s(:regexp ...)` node so I chose to fully parse the regexp rather than try to do a string pattern.
- Closes #169
dgollahon
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 3, 2021
- Adds the following mutations:
* `a.match(/\Atext/)` -> `b.start_with?('text')`
* `a.match?(/\Atext/)` -> `b.start_with?('text')`
* `a =~ /\Atext/` -> `b.start_with?('text')`
- NOTE: Adds a `Mutant::AST::Regexp.expand_regexp_ast` to avoid repeating AST expansion logic in the `send` mutator. At that level, the node appears as a simple `parser` `s(:regexp ...)` node so I chose to fully parse the regexp rather than try to do a string pattern.
- Closes #169
dgollahon
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 7, 2021
- Adds the following mutations:
* `a.match(/\Atext/)` -> `b.start_with?('text')`
* `a.match?(/\Atext/)` -> `b.start_with?('text')`
* `a =~ /\Atext/` -> `b.start_with?('text')`
- NOTE: Adds a `Mutant::AST::Regexp.expand_regexp_ast` to avoid repeating AST expansion logic in the `send` mutator. At that level, the node appears as a simple `parser` `s(:regexp ...)` node so I chose to fully parse the regexp rather than try to do a string pattern.
- Closes #169
dgollahon
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jan 7, 2021
- Adds the following mutations:
* `a.match(/\Atext/)` -> `b.start_with?('text')`
* `a.match?(/\Atext/)` -> `b.start_with?('text')`
* `a =~ /\Atext/` -> `b.start_with?('text')`
- NOTE: Adds a `Mutant::AST::Regexp.expand_regexp_ast` to avoid repeating AST expansion logic in the `send` mutator. At that level, the node appears as a simple `parser` `s(:regexp ...)` node so I chose to fully parse the regexp rather than try to do a string pattern.
- Closes #169
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: