cli: tunnels can sporadically become unresponsive #181285
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Last iteration I moved some RPC logic to use Tokios "codecs" to give them cancellation safety. These operate on streams of input data. While this worked at first, I failed to take into account that the byte buffer we read from the stream could have _more_ data than just the current message under load scenarios. We were discarding any extra data from the subsequent message. In most cases caused the next message "length" to be read from the middle of the next message, which usually (when parsed as a u32) was some number of gigabytes, then causing the connection to stall forever. Fixes #181284
TylerLeonhardt
approved these changes
May 2, 2023
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Last iteration I moved some RPC logic to use Tokios "codecs" to give
them cancellation safety. These operate on streams of input data.
While this worked at first, I failed to take into account that the byte
buffer we read from the stream could have more data than just the
current message under load scenarios. We were discarding any extra data
from the subsequent message. In most cases caused the next message
"length" to be read from the middle of the next message, which usually
(when parsed as a u32) was some number of gigabytes, then causing the
connection to stall forever.
For #181284