Tech Debt : Display proper error message when update pin map step is… #719
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
prat-mahendran
requested review from
samchris007,
jayaseelan-james and
SowmyaRavee
prat-mahendran
requested review from
csjall,
dixonjoel,
bkeryan,
mshafer-NI and
nstokes-nati
as code owners
prat-mahendran
changed the title
jayaseelan-james
approved these changes
May 9, 2024
SowmyaRavee
reviewed
May 9, 2024
prat-mahendran
changed the title
dixonjoel
approved these changes
May 9, 2024
SowmyaRavee
approved these changes
May 10, 2024
bkeryan
requested changes
May 10, 2024
bkeryan
approved these changes
May 13, 2024
dixonjoel
deleted the
users/Prathana/Add_error_message_update_pinMap_missing
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this Pull Request accomplish?
self._sequence_context.Execution.RunTimeVariables.Existsmethod call to determine if the fieldPinMapIdexists in TestStand. It returns a Boolean value. If the field is not available, we throw a runtime error; if it is available, we proceed and return its value.Why should this Pull Request be merged?
Before
After
What testing has been done?
Manually verified the example execution.