Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

shared-libuv is ignored by uvwasi.gyp #39248

Closed
kapouer opened this issue Jul 3, 2021 · 0 comments
Closed

shared-libuv is ignored by uvwasi.gyp #39248

kapouer opened this issue Jul 3, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@kapouer
Copy link
Contributor

kapouer commented Jul 3, 2021

  • Version: all versions since deps/uvwasi
  • Platform: all i guess
  • Subsystem: config/build

What steps will reproduce the bug?

./configure --shared-libuv

What is the expected behavior?

Do not build deps/uv, use system shared library.

What do you see instead?

uv.gyp is pulled by uvwasi and deps/uv is built

kapouer added a commit to kapouer/node that referenced this issue Jul 4, 2021

Verified

This commit was created on github.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature. The key has expired.
targos pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 11, 2021

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature.
targos Michaël Zasso
Fix #39248.

PR-URL: #39260
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 4, 2021

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature.
targos Michaël Zasso
Fix #39248.

PR-URL: #39260
Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant