Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: mark multiple long-time experimental APIs as stable #57510

Closed

Conversation

jasnell
Copy link
Member

@jasnell jasnell commented Mar 16, 2025

These have been stable for a while now

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. label Mar 16, 2025
@jasnell jasnell requested a review from mcollina March 17, 2025 00:07
@jasnell jasnell requested a review from anonrig March 17, 2025 00:07
Co-authored-by: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@aduh95 aduh95 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can't vouch for each API here, but given the length of the experimental period, LGTM

Copy link
Member

@mcollina mcollina left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@marco-ippolito
Copy link
Member

Instead of removing the stability index change it to

> Stability: 2 - Stable

@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented Mar 17, 2025

Instead of removing the stability index change it to

> Stability: 2 - Stable

Only for tracing.md, the others inherit the stable status already

Copy link
Member

@legendecas legendecas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM to mark most of the APIs in this PR as stable, except for the trace event module.

Additionally, the trace event module documents that it does not work for worker threads. This is not a good state to mark it as stable.

@jasnell jasnell requested a review from legendecas March 18, 2025 13:58
@legendecas
Copy link
Member

Thanks!

jasnell added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2025
* AsyncLocalStorage snapshot and bind APIs
* multiple web streams apis
* MIMEType API
* Transferable AbortSignal/Controller

PR-URL: #57510
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
@jasnell
Copy link
Member Author

jasnell commented Mar 20, 2025

Landed in 9640379

@jasnell jasnell closed this Mar 20, 2025
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2025
* AsyncLocalStorage snapshot and bind APIs
* multiple web streams apis
* MIMEType API
* Transferable AbortSignal/Controller

PR-URL: #57510
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2025
* AsyncLocalStorage snapshot and bind APIs
* multiple web streams apis
* MIMEType API
* Transferable AbortSignal/Controller

PR-URL: #57510
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2025
* AsyncLocalStorage snapshot and bind APIs
* multiple web streams apis
* MIMEType API
* Transferable AbortSignal/Controller

PR-URL: #57510
Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com>
Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants