Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on May 1, 2024. It is now read-only.

require even more uniq package names #491

Closed Answered by MylesBorins
jimmywarting asked this question in Registry
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

@jimmywarting this is a great idea, such a great idea that our team is already working on it! I hope you understand that I can't share too many details as we don't want people gaming the system.

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by MylesBorins
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants