Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rpcsrv: properly close RPC clients in tests #3355

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2024
Merged

Conversation

AnnaShaleva
Copy link
Member

This commit doesn't fix anything, but clients should be closed, it's just a good practice.

Ref. #3350 (comment).

This commit doesn't fix anything, but clients should be closed, it's
just a good practice.

Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
@AnnaShaleva AnnaShaleva added the rpc RPC server and client label Mar 14, 2024
@AnnaShaleva AnnaShaleva added this to the v0.106.0 milestone Mar 14, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.68%. Comparing base (67d3917) to head (37d4012).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3355      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.73%   84.68%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         331      331              
  Lines       44932    44932              
==========================================
- Hits        38073    38049      -24     
- Misses       5342     5372      +30     
+ Partials     1517     1511       -6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@roman-khimov roman-khimov merged commit 9c83bef into master Mar 14, 2024
17 of 20 checks passed
@roman-khimov roman-khimov deleted the close-rpc-clietn branch March 14, 2024 08:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rpc RPC server and client
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants