Lint: Fix violations of S1009: should omit nil check; len() for nil slices is defined as zero #14973
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
terencechain
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2025
rkapka
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 19, 2025
…lices is defined as zero (#14973) * Fix violations of S1009: should omit nil check; len() for nil slices is defined as zero * Changelog fragment
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this?
Bug fix
What does this PR do? Why is it needed?
Which issues(s) does this PR fix?
Requirement for updates to go1.24.0 #14969
These issues will fail CI with the updates to go1.24.0
Other notes for review
Acknowledgements